Re: Don't forget Blaze [was Re: Adobe Unveils Technical Communication Suite]

2007-09-27 Thread Michael Müller-Hillebrand

Hedley,

What percentage of the FrameMaker audience do you think is waiting  
for such a »feature«? What company will care to implement that as a  
standard function of their software?


Sorry, I cannot resist to tell you, that *if* you can come up with an  
algorithm for that »problem« of yours, it can be solved today using  
API programming or scripting. FrameMaker allows overrides to the size  
and position of text frames on every single page and you can  
therefore control how many lines appear.


- Michael Müller-Hillebrand

Am 27.09.2007 um 01:14 schrieb Hedley Finger:


   Here's another feature:
   Another feature that should be implemented is automatic
   adjustment of page depth.  Commercial publishers are always
   keen for every page to be full, that is, full-depth.  So even where
   a diagram or whatever SHOULD be in-line for pedagogical
   reasons, they will place it on another page with a figure title or
   whatever and cross-reference it from its natural in-line home.
   When I used to lay out books with full-depth pages, one way to
   get rid of orphans and widows was to make a double-spread
   a line shorter or a line deeper than normal to push the offending
   line forward or pull it back.
   This could be automated, with the proviso that a shallow page
   should never be immediately followed by a deeper page.  Believe
   me, no reader ever notices!  And you can avoid the problem of the
   last two lines of a para being dragged onto the next page, thus
   leaving a double-spread where one side is normal depth and the
   facing page is (apparently) one line shallower because a line
   has been pushed over.


--
___
Michael Müller-Hillebrand: Dokumentations-Technologien
Adobe Certified Expert, FrameMaker
Lösungen und Training, FrameScript, XML/XSL, Unicode
http://cap-studio.de/ -- Tel. +49 (9131) 28747



___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Don't forget Blaze [was "Re: Adobe Unveils Technical Communication Suite"]

2007-09-27 Thread Hedley Finger

   Eric:
   At Wednesday, 26/09/2007, 11:20 PM;, you wrote:

 On 9/25/07, Hedley Finger <[1] hfinger at handholding.com.au> wrote:

  Well, it will be if we ALL start screaming for
  So, everyone get on it:

 [2]http://www.adobe.com/support/feature.html
 How about someone re-write all those wishes into a format that will
 cut and paste into the Adobe form?

   Geez, I have been harping on about all this stuff for years, on lists,
   to Dov, on Adobe surveys and what all.
   So can I be excused from going to the less than friendly Adobe page to
   type them all in yet AGAIN?
   Now that Madcap is trumpeting Blaze as the (eventual) FrameMaker
   killer, I bet there is someone at
   Adobe paid to monitor these lists full-time.
   Here's another feature:
   Another feature that should be implemented is automatic
   adjustment of page depth.  Commercial publishers are always
   keen for every page to be full, that is, full-depth.  So even where
   a diagram or whatever SHOULD be in-line for pedagogical
   reasons, they will place it on another page with a figure title or
   whatever and cross-reference it from its natural in-line home.
   When I used to lay out books with full-depth pages, one way to
   get rid of orphans and widows was to make a double-spread
   a line shorter or a line deeper than normal to push the offending
   line forward or pull it back.
   This could be automated, with the proviso that a shallow page
   should never be immediately followed by a deeper page.  Believe
   me, no reader ever notices!  And you can avoid the problem of the
   last two lines of a para being dragged onto the next page, thus
   leaving a double-spread where one side is normal depth and the
   facing page is (apparently) one line shallower because a line
   has been pushed over.
   By the way, whenever writing to any Adobe person or submitting
   suggestions to the Adobe page at <[3]
   http://www.adobe.com/support/feature.html>, don't forget to copy
   Sharon Burton
   Product Manager, Blaze
   Madcap Software
sburton at madcapsoftware.com
   Voice: 858-320-0387 x217
   Regards,
   Hedley

   --
   Hedley Stewart Finger
   28 Regent Street   Camberwell VIC 3124   Australia
   Tel. +61 3 9809 1229   Mobile +61 412 461 558,
   E-mail <[4] mailto:hfinger at handholding.com.au>

References

   1. mailto:hfinger at handholding.com.au
   2. http://www.adobe.com/support/feature.html
   3. http://www.adobe.com/support/feature.html
   4. mailto:hfinger at handholding.com.au



Don't forget Blaze [was "Re: Adobe Unveils Technical Communication Suite"]

2007-09-27 Thread Michael Müller-Hillebrand
Hedley,

What percentage of the FrameMaker audience do you think is waiting  
for such a ?feature?? What company will care to implement that as a  
standard function of their software?

Sorry, I cannot resist to tell you, that *if* you can come up with an  
algorithm for that ?problem? of yours, it can be solved today using  
API programming or scripting. FrameMaker allows overrides to the size  
and position of text frames on every single page and you can  
therefore control how many lines appear.

- Michael M?ller-Hillebrand

Am 27.09.2007 um 01:14 schrieb Hedley Finger:

>Here's another feature:
>Another feature that should be implemented is automatic
>adjustment of page depth.  Commercial publishers are always
>keen for every page to be full, that is, full-depth.  So even where
>a diagram or whatever SHOULD be in-line for pedagogical
>reasons, they will place it on another page with a figure title or
>whatever and cross-reference it from its natural in-line home.
>When I used to lay out books with full-depth pages, one way to
>get rid of orphans and widows was to make a double-spread
>a line shorter or a line deeper than normal to push the offending
>line forward or pull it back.
>This could be automated, with the proviso that a shallow page
>should never be immediately followed by a deeper page.  Believe
>me, no reader ever notices!  And you can avoid the problem of the
>last two lines of a para being dragged onto the next page, thus
>leaving a double-spread where one side is normal depth and the
>facing page is (apparently) one line shallower because a line
>has been pushed over.

--
___
Michael M?ller-Hillebrand: Dokumentations-Technologien
Adobe Certified Expert, FrameMaker
L?sungen und Training, FrameScript, XML/XSL, Unicode
http://cap-studio.de/ -- Tel. +49 (9131) 28747






Don't forget Blaze [was Re: Adobe Unveils Technical Communication Suite]

2007-09-26 Thread Hedley Finger

   Eric:
   At Wednesday, 26/09/2007, 11:20 PM;, you wrote:

 On 9/25/07, Hedley Finger [1] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Well, it will be if we ALL start screaming for
  So, everyone get on it:

 [2]http://www.adobe.com/support/feature.html
 How about someone re-write all those wishes into a format that will
 cut and paste into the Adobe form?

   Geez, I have been harping on about all this stuff for years, on lists,
   to Dov, on Adobe surveys and what all.
   So can I be excused from going to the less than friendly Adobe page to
   type them all in yet AGAIN?
   Now that Madcap is trumpeting Blaze as the (eventual) FrameMaker
   killer, I bet there is someone at
   Adobe paid to monitor these lists full-time.
   Here's another feature:
   Another feature that should be implemented is automatic
   adjustment of page depth.  Commercial publishers are always
   keen for every page to be full, that is, full-depth.  So even where
   a diagram or whatever SHOULD be in-line for pedagogical
   reasons, they will place it on another page with a figure title or
   whatever and cross-reference it from its natural in-line home.
   When I used to lay out books with full-depth pages, one way to
   get rid of orphans and widows was to make a double-spread
   a line shorter or a line deeper than normal to push the offending
   line forward or pull it back.
   This could be automated, with the proviso that a shallow page
   should never be immediately followed by a deeper page.  Believe
   me, no reader ever notices!  And you can avoid the problem of the
   last two lines of a para being dragged onto the next page, thus
   leaving a double-spread where one side is normal depth and the
   facing page is (apparently) one line shallower because a line
   has been pushed over.
   By the way, whenever writing to any Adobe person or submitting
   suggestions to the Adobe page at [3]
   http://www.adobe.com/support/feature.html, don't forget to copy
   Sharon Burton
   Product Manager, Blaze
   Madcap Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Voice: 858-320-0387 x217
   Regards,
   Hedley

   --
   Hedley Stewart Finger
   28 Regent Street   Camberwell VIC 3124   Australia
   Tel. +61 3 9809 1229   Mobile +61 412 461 558,
   E-mail [4] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

References

   1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   2. http://www.adobe.com/support/feature.html
   3. http://www.adobe.com/support/feature.html
   4. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.