Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Dear all, we are generating EclipseHelp and OmniHelp for our documentation and chose Mif2Go. Everything runs perfect except on one point: after conversion, graphics are there, well layed out but of terrible quality. I attach an original picture and its generated counterpart. We've played with GraphicExportDPI and GraphicExportFormat but to no avail so far. Do you have any strategy for obtaining graphics of a decent quality in our HTML output? I guess it is something to be thought about from scratch, when importing them in Frame. Is there any rule to respect (for instance, import in xx DPI in Frame, then set GraphicExportDPI to xx DPI)? Thank you very much in anticipation, Mathieu. P.S.: work environment is FM9 on Vista 64. _ Hotmail et MSN dans la poche? HOTMAIL et MSN sont dispo gratuitement sur votre téléphone! http://www.messengersurvotremobile.com/?d=Hotmail___ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
RE: Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Hi Mathieu, As far as I know, attachments are not allowed in this mailing list. However, your attachment could not answer questions like these: o Which graphic format do you use in FrameMaker? o Are the graphics referenced? o What is the content of the anchored frames with the graphics? Only a single graphics files or several graphics files or also any FrameMaker graphics object? o Do all converted graphics files have a bad quality or only specific ones? If not all, what are the differences? o Which graphics settings in the ini file did you test with which result? o Do you use the latest Mif2Go update? I do not know, whether I can help you. However, these answers will help to find an answer. Best regards Winfried -Original Message- From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of mathieu jacquet Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:50 AM To: framers@lists.frameusers.com Subject: Graphics quality - Mif2Go Dear all, we are generating EclipseHelp and OmniHelp for our documentation and chose Mif2Go. Everything runs perfect except on one point: after conversion, graphics are there, well layed out but of terrible quality. I attach an original picture and its generated counterpart. We've played with GraphicExportDPI and GraphicExportFormat but to no avail so far. Do you have any strategy for obtaining graphics of a decent quality in our HTML output? I guess it is something to be thought about from scratch, when importing them in Frame. Is there any rule to respect (for instance, import in xx DPI in Frame, then set GraphicExportDPI to xx DPI)? Thank you very much in anticipation, Mathieu. P.S.: work environment is FM9 on Vista 64. _ Hotmail et MSN dans la poche? HOTMAIL et MSN sont dispo gratuitement sur votre téléphone! http://www.messengersurvotremobile.com/?d=Hotmail ___ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
Re: Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Mathieu While I've got the latest version of Mif2Go, I've not used it in quite awhile since I no longer have the requirement to produce HTML docs. So, I'm in a memory fog here. Back when I first started to use Mif2Go to product HTML docs, I was not happy with the quality of the graphics in my HTML output from FrameMaker. If I remember correctly, using the FrameMaker export filters resulted in the poor graphics quality. What you need to do is use a third party tool to create the graphics, then tell Mif2Go to use the third-party graphics directly. In your Mif2Go manual, check out 4.8.2.3 Using Third Party Graphics Converters (this from my 2007 May 01 Mif2Go manual). Best bet is to contact Omni Systems with your question, or maybe Jeremy will read your posting and will point you in the right direction. As I remember, Mif2Go support (Jeremy) was very helpful. Good luck, Richard ___ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
Re: Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Although I use MIF2GO for conversion, I usually use PNG format graphics in my Frame files so no conversion is necessary. If something needs to change, I usually do a batch resize or conversion of graphics myself, using Photoshop, although any suitable program should work. Art Art Campbell art.campb...@gmail.com ... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent and a redheaded girl. -- Richard Thompson No disclaimers apply. DoD 358 On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:28 AM, ri...@inficon.com wrote: Mathieu While I've got the latest version of Mif2Go, I've not used it in quite awhile since I no longer have the requirement to produce HTML docs. So, I'm in a memory fog here. Back when I first started to use Mif2Go to product HTML docs, I was not happy with the quality of the graphics in my HTML output from FrameMaker. If I remember correctly, using the FrameMaker export filters resulted in the poor graphics quality. What you need to do is use a third party tool to create the graphics, then tell Mif2Go to use the third-party graphics directly. In your Mif2Go manual, check out 4.8.2.3 Using Third Party Graphics Converters (this from my 2007 May 01 Mif2Go manual). Best bet is to contact Omni Systems with your question, or maybe Jeremy will read your posting and will point you in the right direction. As I remember, Mif2Go support (Jeremy) was very helpful. Good luck, Richard ___ You are currently subscribed to framers as art.campb...@gmail.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/art.campbell%40gmail.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info. ___ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
Re: Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Hi Mathieu I just use the graphics as is, so I don't convert them. From the MIF2Go Help: 22.4.1 Using referenced graphics without converting ***22.4.1 Using referenced graphics without converting* If some referenced graphics are already in a format appropriate for Web use, such as JPEG, GIF, or PNG (see §29.1.4 *Graphics formats for HTML*z129x1162767.htm#Rz129x19891); and if they are alone in their anchored frames (no callouts or in-frametitles, for example); you do not have to convert them. Either check *Use original graphic names* in the *Mif2Go* *Export* dialog, or set the following option in the configuration file: [Graphics] UseOriginalGraphicNames=Yes For details, see §29.3.1.4 *Using original files and image sizes forreferenced graphics * z129x1194622.htm#Rz129x42868. The naming is preserved like any other in the img src=.../ tags. Unless you explicitly remap a name in the [GraphFiles] section (see §22.4.2 *Specifying formats of replacement graphics* z122x1249169.htm#Rz122x32239), or specify a GraphSuffix in the [Graphics] section, the graphic name is always passed through unchanged. If the original graphics are not in the same folder as the FrameMaker files, set the following option also (see §22.3 *Locating graphics files for HTML*z122x1326720.htm#Rz122x81089 ): [Graphics] StripGraphPath=Yes If you have supplied replacements for referenced graphics that are in a different format, and if the replacements have the same base names as the originals, you can specify just the new file extension (see §29.3.1.2 *Substituting graphics files for HTML* z129x1112424.htm#Rz129x40236): [Graphics] GraphSuffix=jpg Use this setting when you convert referenced graphics with a third-party program; see §4.10.2.3 *Using third-party graphics converters*z104x1000863.htm#Rz104x80713 . A problem arises if you add any FrameMaker elements, such as arrows or callouts, to a referenced graphic. You can direct *Mif2Go* to use the FrameMaker export filters to convert the whole graphic to JPEG or GIF; see §4.10.2.2 *Using FrameMaker graphic export filters* z104x1085973.htm#Rz104x19843. Or you can reproduce the elements in the external graphic with a third-party program. Cheers -- Yves Barbion www.scripto.nu ___ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
RE: Graphics quality - Mif2Go
I use FrameMaker 9 in TCS2 patched to p250 on Win32 XP Pro SP3 box. I use PNG format exclusively, SnagIt 8 to take screenshots and edit, and set to 96 DPI on all graphics in a FrameMaker frame-shrink. Recently, after p250 upgrade, I have experienced spontaneous reformatting of random graphics. The only evident pattern is that the graphics appear to be reformatted to a lower DPI setting than 96 DPI, although FM still displays Object Properties as 96 DPI, and that the issue continues to plague me. I review my work in FM, build a PostScript file, and distill the PS into a PDF. The gnarly graphics are usually noticed in a 3rd party review of the PDF. When I check my FM source, the graphic I had previously confirmed as good is now gnarly. The fix is to locate the offending graphic, double-click it to open in my default tool, SnagIt 8, then save it. That's all. When I return to FM, the graphic is as coded. Due to the state of Adobe Support, I have not reported this issue. (I trust that R. J. and Jeremy are lurking.) In conclusion, my belief is that Mif2Go grabs the graphic from FrameMaker and uses it the way it finds it. You may very well have the same/related issue as I have experienced...regards, Kelly. -Original Message- From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of mathieu jacquet Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 3:50 AM To: framers@lists.frameusers.com Subject: Graphics quality - Mif2Go Dear all, we are generating EclipseHelp and OmniHelp for our documentation and chose Mif2Go. Everything runs perfect except on one point: after conversion, graphics are there, well layed out but of terrible quality. I attach an original picture and its generated counterpart. We've played with GraphicExportDPI and GraphicExportFormat but to no avail so far. Do you have any strategy for obtaining graphics of a decent quality in our HTML output? I guess it is something to be thought about from scratch, when importing them in Frame. Is there any rule to respect (for instance, import in xx DPI in Frame, then set GraphicExportDPI to xx DPI)? Thank you very much in anticipation, Mathieu. P.S.: work environment is FM9 on Vista 64. _ Hotmail et MSN dans la poche? HOTMAIL et MSN sont dispo gratuitement sur votre téléphone! http://www.messengersurvotremobile.com/?d=Hotmail ___ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
Re: Graphics quality - Mif2Go
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Kelly McDaniel kmcdan...@pavtech.comwrote: (...) In conclusion, my belief is that Mif2Go grabs the graphic from FrameMaker and uses it the way it finds it. You may very well have the same/related issue as I have experienced...regards, Kelly. You can make MIF2Go do that by selecting the option Do not write graphics files. See also: *3.7.4.1 Omitting and restoring graphics production in the MIF2Go Help* Cheers -- Yves Barbion www.scripto.nu ___ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
RE: Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Thanks for the info, however, I’m not currently using Mif2Go in production…that may change very soon, tho’…regards, Kelly. From: Yves Barbion [mailto:yves.barb...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:33 AM To: Kelly McDaniel Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com Subject: Re: Graphics quality - Mif2Go On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Kelly McDaniel kmcdan...@pavtech.com wrote: (...) In conclusion, my belief is that Mif2Go grabs the graphic from FrameMaker and uses it the way it finds it. You may very well have the same/related issue as I have experienced...regards, Kelly. You can make MIF2Go do that by selecting the option Do not write graphics files. See also: 3.7.4.1 Omitting and restoring graphics production in the MIF2Go Help Cheers -- Yves Barbion www.scripto.nu ___ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
RE: Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Thank you all for your pieces of advice! I'll have a look at your options and try to apply them to my workflow. Thank you again, Mathieu. _ Consultez vos emails Orange, Gmail, Yahoo!, Free ... directement depuis HOTMAIL ! http://www.windowslive.fr/hotmail/agregation/ ___ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Dear all, we are generating EclipseHelp and OmniHelp for our documentation and chose Mif2Go. Everything runs perfect except on one point: after conversion, graphics are there, well layed out but of terrible quality. I attach an original picture and its generated counterpart. We've played with GraphicExportDPI and GraphicExportFormat but to no avail so far. Do you have any strategy for obtaining graphics of a decent quality in our HTML output? I guess it is something to be thought about from scratch, when importing them in Frame. Is there any rule to respect (for instance, import in xx DPI in Frame, then set GraphicExportDPI to xx DPI)? Thank you very much in anticipation, Mathieu. P.S.: work environment is FM9 on Vista 64. _ Hotmail et MSN dans la poche? HOTMAIL et MSN sont dispo gratuitement sur votre t?l?phone! http://www.messengersurvotremobile.com/?d=Hotmail
Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Hi Mathieu, As far as I know, attachments are not allowed in this mailing list. However, your attachment could not answer questions like these: o Which graphic format do you use in FrameMaker? o Are the graphics referenced? o What is the content of the anchored frames with the graphics? Only a single graphics files or several graphics files or also any FrameMaker graphics object? o Do all converted graphics files have a bad quality or only specific ones? If not all, what are the differences? o Which graphics settings in the ini file did you test with which result? o Do you use the latest Mif2Go update? I do not know, whether I can help you. However, these answers will help to find an answer. Best regards Winfried > -Original Message- > From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com > [mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of > mathieu jacquet > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:50 AM > To: framers at lists.frameusers.com > Subject: Graphics quality - Mif2Go > > > Dear all, > > we are generating EclipseHelp and OmniHelp for our > documentation and chose Mif2Go. Everything runs perfect > except on one point: after conversion, graphics are there, > well layed out but of terrible quality. I attach an original > picture and its generated counterpart. We've played with > GraphicExportDPI and GraphicExportFormat but to no avail so far. > > Do you have any strategy for obtaining graphics of a decent > quality in our HTML output? I guess it is something to be > thought about from scratch, when importing them in Frame. Is > there any rule to respect (for instance, import in xx DPI in > Frame, then set GraphicExportDPI to xx DPI)? > > Thank you very much in anticipation, > Mathieu. > > P.S.: work environment is FM9 on Vista 64. > > _ > Hotmail et MSN dans la poche? HOTMAIL et MSN sont dispo > gratuitement sur votre t?l?phone! > http://www.messengersurvotremobile.com/?d=Hotmail
Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Mathieu While I've got the latest version of Mif2Go, I've not used it in quite awhile since I no longer have the requirement to produce HTML docs. So, I'm in a memory fog here. Back when I first started to use Mif2Go to product HTML docs, I was not happy with the quality of the graphics in my HTML output from FrameMaker. If I remember correctly, using the FrameMaker export filters resulted in the poor graphics quality. What you need to do is use a third party tool to create the graphics, then tell Mif2Go to use the third-party graphics directly. In your Mif2Go manual, check out 4.8.2.3 Using Third Party Graphics Converters (this from my 2007 May 01 Mif2Go manual). Best bet is to contact Omni Systems with your question, or maybe Jeremy will read your posting and will point you in the right direction. As I remember, Mif2Go support (Jeremy) was very helpful. Good luck, Richard
Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Although I use MIF2GO for conversion, I usually use PNG format graphics in my Frame files so no conversion is necessary. If something needs to change, I usually do a batch resize or conversion of graphics myself, using Photoshop, although any suitable program should work. Art Art Campbell art.campbell at gmail.com "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson No disclaimers apply. DoD 358 On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:28 AM, wrote: > Mathieu > > While I've got the latest version of Mif2Go, I've not used it in quite > awhile since I no longer have the requirement to produce HTML docs. So, > I'm in a memory fog here. Back when I first started to use Mif2Go to > product HTML docs, I was not happy with the quality of the graphics in my > HTML output from FrameMaker. If I remember correctly, using the FrameMaker > export filters resulted in the poor graphics quality. What you need to do > is use a third party tool to create the graphics, then tell Mif2Go to use > the third-party graphics directly. In your Mif2Go manual, check out > 4.8.2.3 Using Third Party Graphics Converters (this from my 2007 May 01 > Mif2Go manual). > > Best bet is to contact Omni Systems with your question, or maybe Jeremy > will read your posting and will point you in the right direction. As I > remember, Mif2Go support (Jeremy) was very helpful. > > Good luck, > Richard > > ___ > > > You are currently subscribed to framers as art.campbell at gmail.com. > > Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com. > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com > or visit > http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/art.campbell%40gmail.com > > Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit > http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info. >
Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Hi Mathieu I just use the graphics "as is", so I don't convert them. >From the MIF2Go Help: 22.4.1 Using referenced graphics without converting ***22.4.1 Using referenced graphics without converting* If some referenced graphics are already in a format appropriate for Web use, such as JPEG, GIF, or PNG (see ?29.1.4 *Graphics formats for HTML*); and if they are alone in their anchored frames (no callouts or in-frametitles, for example); you do not have to convert them. Either check *Use original graphic names* in the *Mif2Go* *Export* dialog, or set the following option in the configuration file: [Graphics] UseOriginalGraphicNames=Yes For details, see ?29.3.1.4 *Using original files and image sizes forreferenced graphics * . The naming is preserved like any other in the tags. Unless you explicitly remap a name in the [GraphFiles] section (see ?22.4.2 *Specifying formats of replacement graphics* ), or specify a GraphSuffix in the [Graphics] section, the graphic name is always passed through unchanged. If the original graphics are not in the same folder as the FrameMaker files, set the following option also (see ?22.3 *Locating graphics files for HTML* ): [Graphics] StripGraphPath=Yes If you have supplied replacements for referenced graphics that are in a different format, and if the replacements have the same base names as the originals, you can specify just the new file extension (see ?29.3.1.2 *Substituting graphics files for HTML* ): [Graphics] GraphSuffix=jpg Use this setting when you convert referenced graphics with a third-party program; see ?4.10.2.3 *Using third-party graphics converters* . A problem arises if you add any FrameMaker elements, such as arrows or callouts, to a referenced graphic. You can direct *Mif2Go* to use the FrameMaker export filters to convert the whole graphic to JPEG or GIF; see ?4.10.2.2 *Using FrameMaker graphic export filters* . Or you can reproduce the elements in the external graphic with a third-party program. Cheers -- Yves Barbion www.scripto.nu
Graphics quality - Mif2Go
I use FrameMaker 9 in TCS2 patched to p250 on Win32 XP Pro SP3 box. I use PNG format exclusively, SnagIt 8 to take screenshots and edit, and set to 96 DPI on all graphics in a FrameMaker frame-shrink. Recently, after p250 upgrade, I have experienced spontaneous "reformatting" of random graphics. The only evident pattern is that the graphics appear to be reformatted to a lower DPI setting than 96 DPI, although FM still displays Object Properties as 96 DPI, and that the issue continues to plague me. I review my work in FM, build a PostScript file, and distill the PS into a PDF. The gnarly graphics are usually noticed in a 3rd party review of the PDF. When I check my FM source, the graphic I had previously confirmed as "good" is now gnarly. The fix is to locate the offending graphic, double-click it to open in my default tool, SnagIt 8, then save it. That's all. When I return to FM, the graphic is "as coded." Due to the state of Adobe Support, I have not reported this issue. (I trust that R. J. and Jeremy are lurking.) In conclusion, my belief is that Mif2Go grabs the graphic from FrameMaker and uses it the way it finds it. You may very well have the same/related issue as I have experienced...regards, Kelly. -Original Message- From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of mathieu jacquet Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 3:50 AM To: framers at lists.frameusers.com Subject: Graphics quality - Mif2Go Dear all, we are generating EclipseHelp and OmniHelp for our documentation and chose Mif2Go. Everything runs perfect except on one point: after conversion, graphics are there, well layed out but of terrible quality. I attach an original picture and its generated counterpart. We've played with GraphicExportDPI and GraphicExportFormat but to no avail so far. Do you have any strategy for obtaining graphics of a decent quality in our HTML output? I guess it is something to be thought about from scratch, when importing them in Frame. Is there any rule to respect (for instance, import in xx DPI in Frame, then set GraphicExportDPI to xx DPI)? Thank you very much in anticipation, Mathieu. P.S.: work environment is FM9 on Vista 64. _ Hotmail et MSN dans la poche? HOTMAIL et MSN sont dispo gratuitement sur votre t?l?phone! http://www.messengersurvotremobile.com/?d=Hotmail
Graphics quality - Mif2Go
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Kelly McDaniel wrote: > (...) > > In conclusion, my belief is that Mif2Go grabs the graphic from FrameMaker > and uses it the way it finds it. You may very well have the same/related > issue as I have experienced...regards, Kelly. > You can make MIF2Go do that by selecting the option "Do not write graphics files". See also: *3.7.4.1 Omitting and restoring graphics production in the MIF2Go Help* Cheers -- Yves Barbion www.scripto.nu
Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Thanks for the info, however, I?m not currently using Mif2Go in production?that may change very soon, tho??regards, Kelly. From: Yves Barbion [mailto:yves.barb...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:33 AM To: Kelly McDaniel Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com Subject: Re: Graphics quality - Mif2Go On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Kelly McDaniel wrote: (...) In conclusion, my belief is that Mif2Go grabs the graphic from FrameMaker and uses it the way it finds it. You may very well have the same/related issue as I have experienced...regards, Kelly. You can make MIF2Go do that by selecting the option "Do not write graphics files". See also: 3.7.4.1 Omitting and restoring graphics production in the MIF2Go Help Cheers -- Yves Barbion www.scripto.nu
Graphics quality - Mif2Go
Thank you all for your pieces of advice! I'll have a look at your options and try to apply them to my workflow. Thank you again, Mathieu. _ Consultez vos emails Orange, Gmail, Yahoo!, Free ... directement depuis HOTMAIL ! http://www.windowslive.fr/hotmail/agregation/