[Framework-Team] Re: 3.2 Release Manager
Raphael Ritz wrote: Martijn Pieters wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As far as I know I'm still release manager for 3.x. I've been waiting for the foundation board (in the person of that same limi) to answer some questions I asked about the release manager stipend. Once those have been answered I'll start planning a 3.2 release. The only reason I said anything was due to this sentence: "We need to agree on actually doing that release and find a release manager for it." @Wichert So, no mal-intent :) And I agree that you've done a great job. I'm really glad Spanky's showing so much enthusiasm and willingness to do an important job. That said, I think there is a lot to be said for having the same release manager for the whole 3.x cycle, from a continuity and stability perspective. I must say that I agree with that sentiment, especially in light of what a great job Wichert has done so far. I'm in favour of not changing a winning formula. ;-) I'm probably missing something but I was quite surprised by this discussion coming up now. I would also very much prefer Wichert to continue for the Plone 3.x line if at all possible. Maybe there is a way for Spanky to get "on board" for Plone 4 by helping Wichert and thereby being trained on the job? I would love to shadow Wichert and help him with anything along the way. What I *dont'* want is to slow anybody down. @Spanky: please don't get this wrong. I very much appreciate your willingness to take on such an important task. None taken, I agree with everyone :) Raphael ~Spanky standing by... ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[Framework-Team] Re: 3.2 Release Manager
Martin Aspeli wrote: That said, I think there is a lot to be said for having the same release manager for the whole 3.x cycle, from a continuity and stability perspective. +1 ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Re: [Framework-Team] Re: 3.2 Release Manager
Martijn Pieters wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As far as I know I'm still release manager for 3.x. I've been waiting for the foundation board (in the person of that same limi) to answer some questions I asked about the release manager stipend. Once those have been answered I'll start planning a 3.2 release. I'm really glad Spanky's showing so much enthusiasm and willingness to do an important job. That said, I think there is a lot to be said for having the same release manager for the whole 3.x cycle, from a continuity and stability perspective. I must say that I agree with that sentiment, especially in light of what a great job Wichert has done so far. I'm in favour of not changing a winning formula. ;-) I'm probably missing something but I was quite surprised by this discussion coming up now. I would also very much prefer Wichert to continue for the Plone 3.x line if at all possible. Maybe there is a way for Spanky to get "on board" for Plone 4 by helping Wichert and thereby being trained on the job? @Spanky: please don't get this wrong. I very much appreciate your willingness to take on such an important task. Raphael ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Re: [Framework-Team] Re: 3.2 Release Manager
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> As far as I know I'm still release manager for 3.x. I've been waiting >> for the foundation board (in the person of that same limi) to answer >> some questions I asked about the release manager stipend. Once those >> have been answered I'll start planning a 3.2 release. > > I'm really glad Spanky's showing so much enthusiasm and willingness to do an > important job. That said, I think there is a lot to be said for having the > same release manager for the whole 3.x cycle, from a continuity and > stability perspective. I must say that I agree with that sentiment, especially in light of what a great job Wichert has done so far. I'm in favour of not changing a winning formula. ;-) -- Martijn Pieters ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[Framework-Team] Re: 3.2 Release Manager
Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Spanky wrote: I was following the thread re: Plone 3.2 release, and I volunteered to help manage this release. After getting no replies, I asked in #plone and got the response (from limi) that this team choses the release manager, and that some kind of track record is expected. This is understandable. As far as I know I'm still release manager for 3.x. I've been waiting for the foundation board (in the person of that same limi) to answer some questions I asked about the release manager stipend. Once those have been answered I'll start planning a 3.2 release. I'm really glad Spanky's showing so much enthusiasm and willingness to do an important job. That said, I think there is a lot to be said for having the same release manager for the whole 3.x cycle, from a continuity and stability perspective. Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
