[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #9272: Exposing and editing Dublin Core properties
#9272: Exposing and editing Dublin Core properties ---+ Reporter: jaroel |Owner: jaroel Type: PLIP | Status: assigned Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.0 Component: Templates/CSS | Resolution: Keywords: | ---+ Comment(by jaroel): Ready for merge -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9272#comment:33 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #9285: Show blocked portlets in management interface
#9285: Show blocked portlets in management interface ---+ Reporter: igbun |Owner: igbun Type: PLIP | Status: assigned Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.0 Component: Templates/CSS | Resolution: Keywords: portlets | ---+ Comment(by igbun): (In [29863]) Added docstrings to the affected and new methods, according to review. Refs #9285. -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9285#comment:19 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
Re: [Framework-Team] Re: [Plone 4] Framework Team Minutes – Sept 16, 2009
Alec Mitchell wrote: Owner was there in Plone 3.0. IIRC, it was removed because the name is confusing, particularly since it is redundant with the object ownership. Granting the Manager role means giving local ZMI rights and even the ability to e.g. add a local acl_users and create a little fiefdom, which may not be wise to allow through the sharing tab. In any case only Managers would be able to grant Manager, whereas Owner could be granted more easily. However, I'd suggest we add it back only if we can find a suitable synonym for it. Being able to say grant this person the same rights that I (the creator of this content) have is a very useful thing, even if the default nomenclature is confusing. Alternatively, we could adjust the workflows to make e.g. 'Contributor' more powerful. We can certainly add these roles back, though again I think it's outside the scope of the PLIP (which merely makes it easier for people to add them themselves using GenericSetup). I'm -1 on adding Owner: I think it causes a lot of confusion. That said, we could maybe have it managed in another way, whereby you get a different form for change ownership that lets you assign multiple owners (maybe with one designed as primary). This would set the Contributors metadata and assign the Owner role to multiple people. I'm +0 on adding Manager. It's certainly useful in a lot of situations. In theory, yes, they could go add a bunch of stuff to the ZMI, but for most sites that's not an issue, and sometimes you *do* want to delegate the role. Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[Framework-Team] [Plone 4] Final PLIP reviewing and voting
FWT!, It's final review time for 4.0. We currently have 6 PLIPs awaiting final review and merge vote: 9186Set Image IDs from Title field 9259Group dashboards 9285Show blocked portlets in management interface 9263GenericSetup syntax for importing Sharing page roles 9272Exposing and editing Dublin Core properties 9305Use real names instead of usernames I'll be rearranging the spreadsheet (http://bit.ly/plips) as new ready- for-merge PLIPs come in. Please update your reviews and give us your recommendation. Everyone should be recording their final votes in the PLIP ticket (for posterity) and adding it to our tally in the spreadsheet (for easy tracking). Guest reviewers, we'd appreciate updates to your reviews as well. During yesterday's meeting, we decided that a minimum of 5 votes was needed to make a call on a particular PLIP, with at least half of those votes being positive to merge. If you're unable to review and/or vote, please, let me know. Seriously. I'd much rather know you're not going to do anything than hope you'll do something. Eric ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #9315: New theme for Plone 4
#9315: New theme for Plone 4 ---+ Reporter: limi |Owner: limi Type: PLIP | Status: assigned Priority: n/a|Milestone: 4.0 Component: Templates/CSS | Resolution: Keywords: | ---+ Comment(by limi): (In [29871]) Branching for Plone 4 theme changes. This refs #9315. -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9315#comment:33 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
[Framework-Team] Re: [Plone 4] Final PLIP reviewing and voting
Eric Steele wrote: FWT!, It's final review time for 4.0. We currently have 6 PLIPs awaiting final review and merge vote: 9186Set Image IDs from Title field 9259Group dashboards 9285Show blocked portlets in management interface 9263GenericSetup syntax for importing Sharing page roles 9272Exposing and editing Dublin Core properties 9305Use real names instead of usernames What does this mean for the other PLIPs? - the author hasn't completed required showstopper changes in time? - the reviewer hasn't reviewed their changes? I think the CMF add-views PLIP should be ready as well, as mentioned on the ticket and this list. Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Re: [Framework-Team] Re: [Plone 4] Final PLIP reviewing and voting
On Sep 24, 2009, at 9:03 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Eric Steele wrote: FWT!, It's final review time for 4.0. We currently have 6 PLIPs awaiting final review and merge vote: 9186Set Image IDs from Title field 9259Group dashboards 9285Show blocked portlets in management interface 9263GenericSetup syntax for importing Sharing page roles 9272Exposing and editing Dublin Core properties 9305Use real names instead of usernames What does this mean for the other PLIPs? - the author hasn't completed required showstopper changes in time? - the reviewer hasn't reviewed their changes? I think the CMF add-views PLIP should be ready as well, as mentioned on the ticket and this list. Martin It means the author hasn't indicated that the PLIP is ready for review/ merging or I've managed to completely missed that indication. #9264 added. Eric ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #7822: Make standard file content types use ZODB BLOB support
#7822: Make standard file content types use ZODB BLOB support +--- Reporter: limi|Owner: witsch Type: PLIP| Status: assigned Priority: major |Milestone: 4.0 Component: Infrastructure | Resolution: Keywords: focusarea | +--- Comment(by witsch): (In [29875]) use the right permissions when registering the replacement types for File and Image content, i.e. the original ones from `ATContentTypes` (refs #7822) -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/7822#comment:49 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #9305: Use real names instead of usernames
#9305: Use real names instead of usernames --+- Reporter: laurenskling |Owner: ralphjacobs Type: PLIP | Status: assigned Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.0 Component: Unknown | Resolution: Keywords:| --+- Comment(by davisagli): FWIW, most of the test failures that Ross noted look to me to be due to the fact that the Plone branch for this PLIP was created prior to some refactoring in CMFCore which required me to make an accompanying change in Plone...so probably aren't worth worrying about. Of course, we expect you'll make sure that merging this will not introduce new test failures on the main Plone 4 branch. -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9305#comment:26 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
