Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone 4] Final Voting for Plone 4.0
On Oct 3, 2009, at 1:21 AM, Eric Steele wrote: On Oct 2, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Andreas Zeidler a...@zitc.de wrote: i think #9316 is missing from the list. i was running a bit late, but granted an extra day (hope you remember :)), and david has already updated his review, too. afaik there hasn't been a second review, though. not sure if this is a problem... We'll add that to the list. Not a problem, I just didn't realize it'd been finished. yes, my bad. i was mostly communicating with david directly and didn't clearly state in the ticket that it was ready again. sorry. and thanks! :) andi -- zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - i...@zitc.de friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779 pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/ plone 3.3.1 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone/ ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP9311, postpone final implementation deadline
Okay PLIP9311 'Clean up user related actions' is ready for final review. - Kim Chee On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Kim Chee leong le...@goldmund-wyldebeast-wunderliebe.com wrote: Hello framework team, Today is the final implementation deadline for the PLIPs. I'm working on PLIP 9311 'Clean up user related actions'. I would like to request a postpone for the deadline. I can deliver a final version next week (wednesday 7 October). I'm requesting the delay because I forgot the deadline date and I expected that the deadline date would be moved because of the delayed reviews. I already started working on the review comments from Rob but stopped because I was waiting on the second PLIP review. I know it's my error that I didn't noticed the deadline of the PLIP implementations and I hope it's possible to extend the deadline so I can deliver a proper PLIP. Ofcourse I'm willing to buy you a few beers when we're in Budapest :-). With kind regards, Kim Chee Leong ps. this is the second time I'm sending this mail, my excuses if you got it twice.. -- Goldmund, Wyldebeast Wunderliebe tel : +31 (0)50 5891 631 www : http://www.gw20e.com/ mail: i...@gw20e.com ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #9309: Better search for East Asian (multi-byte) languages.
#9309: Better search for East Asian (multi-byte) languages. -+-- Reporter: terapyon |Owner: terapyon Type: PLIP | Status: assigned Priority: minor|Milestone: 4.0 Component: Unknown | Resolution: Keywords: search splitter CJK | -+-- Comment(by davisagli): Vincent's latest review says there are 8 failures when running the CMFPlone tests. I'm only seeing 3, and one of them is due to the mail host changes in Zope 2.12.0. The other two failures are in tests introduced by this PLIP, and while they should certainly be fixed, that's less worrisome than if this PLIP's changes were causing failures in existing tests. -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9309#comment:37 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #9309: Better search for East Asian (multi-byte) languages.
#9309: Better search for East Asian (multi-byte) languages. -+-- Reporter: terapyon |Owner: terapyon Type: PLIP | Status: assigned Priority: minor|Milestone: 4.0 Component: Unknown | Resolution: Keywords: search splitter CJK | -+-- Comment(by davisagli): Never mind that last message; my buildout wasn't entirely up to date. Now it is, and I'm only seeing the mailhost-related test failure. -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9309#comment:38 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #9321: Reimplement the search form with an eye on usability
#9321: Reimplement the search form with an eye on usability -+-- Reporter: csenger |Owner: csenger Type: PLIP | Status: assigned Priority: minor|Milestone: 4.0 Component: Unknown | Resolution: Keywords: | -+-- Comment(by csenger): (In [30169]) ready for merge I added comments to the review in plip9321-searchform.txt refs #9321 -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9321#comment:29 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
