Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #10961 File uploads to folder_contents
On 23. aug. 2010, at 16:09, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote: I've added downloading multiple files as a zip archive to the proposal. Laurence Isn't that really something completely different than mass uploading? Separate plip? -- Geir Bækholt www.jarn.com/baekholt From phone. Please excuse brevity ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Re: [Framework-Team] Re: [Plone 4] PLIP #9249 Add TinyMCE as the default visual editor
On 27. juli. 2009, at 22.12, Jon Stahl wrote: Absolutely. Getting the code into the Foundation's long-term conservancy is very much worth doing if it's not too terribly hard. I've not been through the process before of moving Collective code to the Foundation, but I know Jarn has done this, so perhaps Geir can enlighten us there on whether any additional steps are required other than making sure all contributors have signed the Contributor Agreement. I don't know of any special considerations beyond the normal ones. - Code must meet Plone's quality assurance level. (i.e pass PLIP review) - All contributors must have signed the agreement. - Some sort of consensus that the code is of general use to Plone and the community, and that the community is the best entity to manage maintenance long term. - Licensing Makes sense to me to move it to the Plone repository in preparation of PLIP review — as long as licenses match and all contributors are clear. :-) -- ___ Geir Bækholt · Managing Director, Jarn · www.jarn.com Plone Solutions, Development, Hosting and Support __ ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[Framework-Team] Re: Combining Search Results PLIPs
I am on my way to vacation with my family, and cannot do anything until Monday at the earliest. I have discussed the search results improvements with Laurens before he submitted his, and the two plips are accidental. They are 95% the same plip. I'll coordinate and make sure there will not be 2 implementations. - but if the plips have to be merged before Monday, someone else needs to do it. (feel free). Sorry abut the delay. -- Geir Bækholt (iPhone) On 2. juli 2009, at 18.52, Alec Mitchell ap...@columbia.edu wrote: Hello Geir and Laurens: Both of your search results PLIPs (9271, 9282) were approved by the Framework Team for inclusion in Plone 4.0. However, all voters expressed a strong preference that the two PLIPs and the effort to implement them be merged. It would not be acceptable to have two competing implementations of the same feature(s) submitted for code review. It is essential that you open a discussion and work together to merge your efforts. Please keep the Framework Team apprised of the results of your discussion by re-submitting a single combined PLIP ASAP. Thank you, Alec Mitchell ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP184 - additional portlets
On Dec 23, 2007, at 01:31 , Martin Aspeli wrote: The PLIP also mentions a better RSS portlet. I won't be able to do that, but rumour is that Wichert has done it in the feedmixer portlet already. Is that correct? If not, do we have any other volunteers? Feedmixer is a better RSS portlet, and should cover most usecases. It aggregates multiple feeds to one (and includes a more… listing.) , but you can easily cover the simple usecase of a single feed as well. - but i also think Wichert has fixed the default RSS portlet so it actually works now. I don't have much of an opinion on which is better for default Plone. I guess this may come down to dependency on third party libraries? -- ___ Geir Bækholt · Managing Director, Jarn · www.jarn.com Plone Solutions, Development, Hosting and Support __ Plone Solutions is now known as Jarn www.jarn.com/name-change ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
