RE: [Framework-Team] random thought: identify the components that lack owners
> -Original Message- > From: Wichert Akkerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Wichert Akkerman > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 12:03 AM > To: Jon Stahl > Cc: framework-team@lists.plone.org > Subject: Re: [Framework-Team] random thought: identify the components that > lack owners > > Previously Jon Stahl wrote: > > We were just chatting a bit here at ONE/Northwest global HQ and the > following idea came up... > > > > Hanno pointed out to me a short while ago that a number of key core Plone > components don't really have strong, active owners. e.g. Wicked, Users + > Groups UI, etc. > > > > However, there's really no definitive list of these that we can use to > recruit more talent. > > > > Could y'all put your heads together via email and draft up such a list, > which we could then use to do some targeted recruiting? > > I'm wondering why this would be a task for the framework team? I'm open for suggestions about who else might take it on. I think we have a bit of a problem in that we have no formally-designated leadership team for the codebase of this project. The FWT seems like the closest thing we have in general, and on this topic, they (including you, Wichert) seem like the folks with the most relevant knowledge. :jon ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Re: [Framework-Team] random thought: identify the components that lack owners
Previously Jon Stahl wrote: > We were just chatting a bit here at ONE/Northwest global HQ and the following > idea came up... > > Hanno pointed out to me a short while ago that a number of key core Plone > components don't really have strong, active owners. e.g. Wicked, Users + > Groups UI, etc. > > However, there's really no definitive list of these that we can use to > recruit more talent. > > Could y'all put your heads together via email and draft up such a list, which > we could then use to do some targeted recruiting? I'm wondering why this would be a task for the framework team? Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[Framework-Team] random thought: identify the components that lack owners
We were just chatting a bit here at ONE/Northwest global HQ and the following idea came up... Hanno pointed out to me a short while ago that a number of key core Plone components don't really have strong, active owners. e.g. Wicked, Users + Groups UI, etc. However, there's really no definitive list of these that we can use to recruit more talent. Could y'all put your heads together via email and draft up such a list, which we could then use to do some targeted recruiting? I have a feeling there is quite a bit of latent talent out there we could tap, if we could write down what needs to be pitched. I'd be willing to help, but lack the tech expertise to totally drive it. :jon -- Jon Stahl | Program Manager ONE/Northwest New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the environment www.onenw.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] 206-286-1235x15 http://blogs.onenw.org/jon Subscribe to ONEList, our email newsletter! Practical advice for effective online engagement http://www.onenw.org/full_signup ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
