[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #9300: Well formed, valid XHTML
#9300: Well formed, valid XHTML --+- Reporter: benglynn |Owner: benglynn Type: PLIP | Status: assigned Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.0 Component: Unknown | Resolution: Keywords:| --+- Comment(by limi): Any updates on this? Was there ever a test suite set up to keep our XHTML from regressing? (Hanno said that there was work done on this during the Bristol sprint) -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9300#comment:19 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #9300: Well formed, valid XHTML
#9300: Well formed, valid XHTML --+- Reporter: benglynn |Owner: benglynn Type: PLIP | Status: assigned Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.0 Component: Unknown | Resolution: Keywords:| --+- Changes (by keul): * cc: keul (added) Comment: Replying to [comment:16 limi]: Just a note to preempt any upcoming confusion here: The new theme for Plone 4 will use HTML5. We're still using the XML variant (also called XHTML5 informally), so it doesn't really affect this PLIP outside of the fact that the DOCTYPE will be different. We should still be well-formed and go by the same rules as XHTML 1.0 does. Can this be the right moment for thinking about move Plone to be also XHTML Strict? http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/4379 This issue is very old, I'm quite interested in helping for reach this! -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9300#comment:18 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #9300: Well formed, valid XHTML
#9300: Well formed, valid XHTML --+- Reporter: benglynn |Owner: benglynn Type: PLIP | Status: assigned Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.0 Component: Unknown | Resolution: Keywords:| --+- Changes (by grahamperrin): * cc: grahamper...@gmail.com (added) -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9300#comment:17 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #9300: Well formed, valid XHTML
#9300: Well formed, valid XHTML --+- Reporter: benglynn |Owner: benglynn Type: PLIP | Status: assigned Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.0 Component: Unknown | Resolution: Keywords:| --+- Comment(by limi): Just a note to preempt any upcoming confusion here: The new theme for Plone 4 will use HTML5. We're still using the XML variant (also called XHTML5 informally), so it doesn't really affect this PLIP outside of the fact that the DOCTYPE will be different. We should still be well-formed and go by the same rules as XHTML 1.0 does. -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9300#comment:16 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
[PLIP-Advisories] Re: [Plone] #9300: Well formed, valid XHTML
#9300: Well formed, valid XHTML --+- Reporter: benglynn |Owner: benglynn Type: PLIP | Status: new Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.0 Component: Unknown | Resolution: Keywords:| --+- Comment(by esteele): Approved by FWT vote. -- Ticket URL: https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9300#comment:14 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
