Re: [Plone-developers] [Framework-Team] Re: Plone 3.2 and 3.3 planning
On 18.09.2008, at 05:04, Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Tom Lazar wrote: if any of my previous conferences and sprints are an indicator, i just *know* that i won't be doing any actual fwt review work while in DC. but that's not important. review work is 'fleissarbeit' to use a nice german term here and can easily be done alone, whenever one can find some time. i'd like to use the time at the conference to discuss actual ideas/plips and to brainstorm the future fwt process, so i have no problem with a post-conference plip deadline (although, it shouldn't be too far after the conference as to not remove momentum from the ideas/plips that have been fleshed out during the conference. so, i guess, i'm +1 on wichert's deadline of one week after the conference. in fact, i think it's pretty much perfect... Keep in mind that at this stage the review will not involve code at all, only ideas/proposals. right, i failed to consider that... Which seems to fit with what you're doing at the conference :) absolutely! bring it on ;-) Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Re: [Plone-developers] [Framework-Team] Re: Plone 3.2 and 3.3 planning
Previously Tom Lazar wrote: > if any of my previous conferences and sprints are an indicator, i just > *know* that i won't be doing any actual fwt review work while in DC. > but that's not important. review work is 'fleissarbeit' to use a nice > german term here and can easily be done alone, whenever one can find > some time. i'd like to use the time at the conference to discuss > actual ideas/plips and to brainstorm the future fwt process, so i have > no problem with a post-conference plip deadline (although, it > shouldn't be too far after the conference as to not remove momentum > from the ideas/plips that have been fleshed out during the conference. > so, i guess, i'm +1 on wichert's deadline of one week after the > conference. in fact, i think it's pretty much perfect... Keep in mind that at this stage the review will not involve code at all, only ideas/proposals. Which seems to fit with what you're doing at the conference :) Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
