Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections

2012-02-15 Thread nicky . hamlyn
I'm pretty sure Sixty films refers to 36 exposure 35mm slide films, not Super 
8 films. One 35mm slide film is about 1.3meters long, which roughly equates to 
five meters of Super 8, whereas a roll of Super 8 is 15 metres long. That means 
a 5 litre kit would process about twenty rolls of Super 8 and a one litre kit 
only about four. (Correct me if I've blundered with the sums!)

Nicky.


 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Timmins on-on...@hotmail.com
To: FrameWorks frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Sent: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:47
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections


Oh right, thanks Nicky


On the box it says that the 5 liter kit can process 60 films. I did the simple 
math and figured that 1ltr should process 12 films with good results. 
Apparently not! Seems a little cunning to state it can do twice the amount the 
chemicals are capable of! 


Best
Kevin  




To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:31:07 -0500
From: nicky.ham...@talktalk.net
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections

I think you may be over-using the chemicals, assuming it's the Tetenal three 
bath kit. If you do the calculations you can do up to six rolls safely, but 
strictly five rolls, if I'm not mistaken, so the sixth is a bonus. After that 
you're gambling with exhausted chemicals,

Nicky Hamlyn.

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Timmins on-on...@hotmail.com
To: FrameWorks frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Sent: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:17
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections


Hi Erin,


Indeed I am using a Lomo developing tank. I did checked the spacing of the film 
on the reels whilst hanging it to dry and all the film looked perfectly 
mounted. However I suppose it could have shifted and re-shifted in the tank 
during the reversal process? I don't know if this will help but the brown bits 
aren't as visible on the lighter (outdoor images) but are worse on the indoor 
images. For example one roll of film (100D) was used indoors and it was 
inevitably very dark anyway. The brown transparent layer seemed much more 
prominent on these darker images and was much more noticeable.


Can that tell me anything?


Kevin  




Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:59:00 -0500
From: eri...@gmail.com
To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections

Hi Kevin,

Are you using a lomo tank?

Your problem sounds like the same one I have had with both E6 and BW reversal 
in lomo tanks.
I think those brown bits are occurring anywhere that the film slips out of 
alignment and touches an adjacent piece of film for too long. 
Neither bit of film is then making proper contact with the processing 
chemicals. 
Further, this seems to be happening somewhere in the reversal stage. 
In one case I actually had this layer going on for a while with bits of 
negative and positive imagery appearing throughout it. I inferred that that the 
film was making proper chemical contact at various stages of the process, but 
not all. That was a particularly poorly loaded tank.

In the case I have described above, the brown stuff is opaque and seems almost 
thicker than the rest of the film. On other film stocks it appears as different 
colours.

Strange that you only had this problem on your 7th and 8th rolls, but less 
strange if you processed them together. Maybe you are encountering something 
totally different.

Hope this helps,

Erin



On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Kevin Timmins on-on...@hotmail.com wrote:


Hi all,


I've been doing a lot of Super 8 developing for people over the last few weeks. 
The last two film I developed last night had an interesting imperfection and I 
wondered if anyone on frameworks could shed some light on what's happening.


The chemicals were mixed on the 1st and as far as I'm aware the chemicals are 
viable for up to 2 weeks. I've actually developed film with chemicals 3 weeks 
old and got fantastic results. However I'm developing other peoples films so 
I'm not developing past today/tomorrow at the very latest. I've got 4 more 
films I need to develop tonight and tomorrow night.


Last night I developed my 7th and 8th super 8 film in the tank (apparently you 
can do up to 12 with one liter), but anyway I wondered if this could contribute 
to the problem.


So the problem... Ok now the films have come out great overall but in parts 
there seems to be this light browny kind of layer that fluidly move across the 
image, in parts it's centralized and in others it's on the edges. Like I say 
overall the images are clearly visible and sharp without much grain but there 
just seems to me this brown mask that intermittently comes and goes. It's 
present on both films I developed. Any ideas? 


Could light be getting in the tank somehow? If anyone has come along this 
effect in the past please let me know.


Thanks
Kevin
  

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks

Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections

2012-02-15 Thread Kevin Timmins

It's amazing how far the chemicals will go if you push it (not figuratively). 
The results are still very good, only with that transparent brown stuff coming 
and going intermittently. I'm going to develop some more of my own films with 
it tonight and see what happens! 
Thanks Nicky for the help! Kevin 

To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:08:03 -0500
From: nicky.ham...@talktalk.net
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections

I'm pretty sure Sixty films refers to 36 exposure 35mm slide films, not Super 
8 films. One 35mm slide film is about 1.3meters long, which roughly equates to 
five meters of Super 8, whereas a roll of Super 8 is 15 metres long. That means 
a 5 litre kit would process about twenty rolls of Super 8 and a one litre kit 
only about four. (Correct me if I've blundered with the sums!)



Nicky.




 






 






 






-Original Message-


From: Kevin Timmins on-on...@hotmail.com


To: FrameWorks frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com


Sent: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:47


Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections





















Oh right, thanks Nicky








On the box it says that the 5 liter kit can process 60 films. I did the simple 
math and figured that 1ltr should process 12 films with good results. 
Apparently not! Seems a little cunning to state it can do twice the amount the 
chemicals are capable of! 










Best



Kevin  












To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com


Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:31:07 -0500


From: nicky.ham...@talktalk.net


Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections





I think you may be over-using the chemicals, assuming it's the Tetenal three 
bath kit. If you do the calculations you can do up to six rolls safely, but 
strictly five rolls, if I'm not mistaken, so the sixth is a bonus. After that 
you're gambling with exhausted chemicals,







Nicky Hamlyn.







 












 












 












-Original Message-




From: Kevin Timmins on-on...@hotmail.com




To: FrameWorks frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com




Sent: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:17




Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections





























Hi Erin,
















Indeed I am using a Lomo developing tank. I did checked the spacing of the film 
on the reels whilst hanging it to dry and all the film looked perfectly 
mounted. However I suppose it could have shifted and re-shifted in the tank 
during the reversal process? I don't know if this will help but the brown bits 
aren't as visible on the lighter (outdoor images) but are worse on the indoor 
images. For example one roll of film (100D) was used indoors and it was 
inevitably very dark anyway. The brown transparent layer seemed much more 
prominent on these darker images and was much more noticeable.




















Can that tell me anything?




















Kevin  





















Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:59:00 -0500




From: eri...@gmail.com




To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com




Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections









Hi Kevin,









Are you using a lomo tank?









Your problem sounds like the same one I have had with both E6 and BW reversal 
in lomo tanks.




I think those brown bits are occurring anywhere that the film slips out of 
alignment and touches an adjacent piece of film for too long. 





Neither bit of film is then making proper contact with the processing 
chemicals. 




Further, this seems to be happening somewhere in the reversal stage. 




In one case I actually had this layer going on for a while with bits of 
negative and positive imagery appearing throughout it. I inferred that that the 
film was making proper chemical contact at various stages of the process, but 
not all. That was a particularly poorly loaded tank.










In the case I have described above, the brown stuff is opaque and seems almost 
thicker than the rest of the film. On other film stocks it appears as different 
colours.









Strange that you only had this problem on your 7th and 8th rolls, but less 
strange if you processed them together. Maybe you are encountering something 
totally different.










Hope this helps,









Erin


















On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Kevin Timmins on-on...@hotmail.com wrote:

















Hi all,
















I've been doing a lot of Super 8 developing for people over the last few weeks. 
The last two film I developed last night had an interesting imperfection and I 
wondered if anyone on frameworks could shed some light on what's happening.





















The chemicals were mixed on the 1st and as far as I'm aware the chemicals are 
viable for up to 2 weeks. I've actually developed film with chemicals 3 weeks 
old and got fantastic results. However I'm developing other peoples films so 
I'm not developing past today/tomorrow at the very latest. I've got 4 more 
films I need to develop tonight and tomorrow night.





















Last night I developed my 7th

Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections

2012-02-15 Thread John Woods
According to Martin Baumgarten (and other sources you should be adding 
developer time as you exhaust the chemicals:

http://lavender.fortunecity.com/lavender/569/spiralreel.html

~~~ BLACK  WHITE Film Processing Control ~~~

(1).   The best way to maintain control of your processing for any 
process type, is to keep track of how many films you have processed in 
a given solution and either replenish the solutions so they maintain 
full-strength and/or adjust your processing time.  A Liter of chemistry 
will process about 6 to 8 rolls of Super 8mm film.  After each roll of 
film if processing separately, add approximately 15 seconds to each 
Developer time only.   Or after processing two rolls of Super 8mm film, 
add 30 seconds to the next film batch.  These are approximations 
intended to quide you to correct final film density. 



He also recommends creating your own control strips so you can keep track of 
the density. He describes that process on that link. I've never done that but 
if you have a large amount of film to process its probably worth the effort.




 From: nicky.ham...@talktalk.net nicky.ham...@talktalk.net
To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com 
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:08:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections
 

I'm pretty sure Sixty films refers to 36 exposure 35mm slide films, not Super 
8 films. One 35mm slide film is about 1.3meters long, which roughly equates to 
five meters of Super 8, whereas a roll of Super 8 is 15 metres long. That means 
a 5 litre kit would process about twenty rolls of Super 8 and a one litre kit 
only about four. (Correct me if I've blundered with the sums!)

Nicky.





-Original Message-
From: Kevin Timmins on-on...@hotmail.com
To: FrameWorks frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Sent: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:47
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections


 
Oh right, thanks Nicky 

On the box it says that the 5 liter kit can process 60 films. I did the simple 
math and figured that 1ltr should process 12 films with good results. 
Apparently not! Seems a little cunning to state it can do twice the amount the 
chemicals are capable of! 

Best
Kevin  




To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:31:07 -0500
From: nicky.ham...@talktalk.net
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections

I think you may be over-using the chemicals, assuming it's the Tetenal three 
bath kit. If you do the calculations you can do up to six rolls safely, but 
strictly five rolls, if I'm not mistaken, so the sixth is a bonus. After that 
you're gambling with exhausted chemicals,

Nicky Hamlyn.




-Original Message-
From: Kevin Timmins on-on...@hotmail.com
To: FrameWorks frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Sent: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:17
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections


 
Hi Erin, 

Indeed I am using a Lomo developing tank. I did checked the spacing of the film 
on the reels whilst hanging it to dry and all the film looked perfectly 
mounted. However I suppose it could have shifted and re-shifted in the tank 
during the reversal process? I don't know if this will help but the brown bits 
aren't as visible on the lighter (outdoor images) but are worse on the indoor 
images. For example one roll of film (100D) was used indoors and it was 
inevitably very dark anyway. The brown transparent layer seemed much more 
prominent on these darker images and was much more noticeable.

Can that tell me anything?

Kevin  




Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:59:00 -0500
From: eri...@gmail.com
To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections

Hi Kevin,

Are you using a lomo tank?

Your problem sounds like the same one I have had with both E6 and BW reversal 
in lomo tanks.
I think those brown bits are occurring anywhere that the film slips out of 
alignment and touches an adjacent piece of film for too long. 
Neither bit of film is then making proper contact with the processing 
chemicals. 
Further, this seems to be happening somewhere in the reversal stage. 
In one case I actually had this layer going on for a while with bits of 
negative and positive imagery appearing throughout it. I inferred that that the 
film was making proper chemical contact at various stages of the process, but 
not all. That was a particularly poorly loaded tank.

In the case I have described above, the brown stuff is opaque and seems almost 
thicker than the rest of the film. On other film stocks it appears as different 
colours.

Strange that you only had this problem on your 7th and 8th rolls, but less 
strange if you processed them together. Maybe you are encountering something 
totally different.

Hope this helps,

Erin



On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Kevin Timmins on-on...@hotmail.com wrote:

Hi all, 


I've been doing a lot of Super 8 developing for people over the last few 
weeks. The last two film I developed last night had an interesting

Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections

2012-02-14 Thread Kevin Timmins

Hi Erin,
Indeed I am using a Lomo developing tank. I did checked the spacing of the film 
on the reels whilst hanging it to dry and all the film looked perfectly 
mounted. However I suppose it could have shifted and re-shifted in the tank 
during the reversal process? I don't know if this will help but the brown bits 
aren't as visible on the lighter (outdoor images) but are worse on the indoor 
images. For example one roll of film (100D) was used indoors and it was 
inevitably very dark anyway. The brown transparent layer seemed much more 
prominent on these darker images and was much more noticeable.
Can that tell me anything?
Kevin  

Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:59:00 -0500
From: eri...@gmail.com
To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections

Hi Kevin,

Are you using a lomo tank?

Your problem sounds like the same one I have had with both E6 and BW reversal 
in lomo tanks.
I think those brown bits are occurring anywhere that the film slips out of 
alignment and touches an adjacent piece of film for too long. 

Neither bit of film is then making proper contact with the processing 
chemicals. 
Further, this seems to be happening somewhere in the reversal stage. 
In one case I actually had this layer going on for a while with bits of 
negative and positive imagery appearing throughout it. I inferred that that the 
film was making proper chemical contact at various stages of the process, but 
not all. That was a particularly poorly loaded tank.


In the case I have described above, the brown stuff is opaque and seems almost 
thicker than the rest of the film. On other film stocks it appears as different 
colours.

Strange that you only had this problem on your 7th and 8th rolls, but less 
strange if you processed them together. Maybe you are encountering something 
totally different.


Hope this helps,

Erin


On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Kevin Timmins on-on...@hotmail.com wrote:





Hi all,
I've been doing a lot of Super 8 developing for people over the last few weeks. 
The last two film I developed last night had an interesting imperfection and I 
wondered if anyone on frameworks could shed some light on what's happening.

The chemicals were mixed on the 1st and as far as I'm aware the chemicals are 
viable for up to 2 weeks. I've actually developed film with chemicals 3 weeks 
old and got fantastic results. However I'm developing other peoples films so 
I'm not developing past today/tomorrow at the very latest. I've got 4 more 
films I need to develop tonight and tomorrow night.

Last night I developed my 7th and 8th super 8 film in the tank (apparently you 
can do up to 12 with one liter), but anyway I wondered if this could contribute 
to the problem.
So the problem... Ok now the films have come out great overall but in parts 
there seems to be this light browny kind of layer that fluidly move across the 
image, in parts it's centralized and in others it's on the edges. Like I say 
overall the images are clearly visible and sharp without much grain but there 
just seems to me this brown mask that intermittently comes and goes. It's 
present on both films I developed. Any ideas? 

Could light be getting in the tank somehow? If anyone has come along this 
effect in the past please let me know.
ThanksKevin
  

___

FrameWorks mailing list

FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com

https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks





___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
  ___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections

2012-02-14 Thread Kevin Timmins

Hi Pip,
I'm always very carful with the first developer and colour developer but yes it 
could well be possible contamination. I was told however that if the first 
developer got mixed somehow with the colour developer that you would not get 
images at all? Is this not the case? What other effects are possible with cross 
contamination of the first and colour developer as thats quite interesting. 
Kind RegardsKevin

Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:21:21 +0100
To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
From: framewo...@re-voir.com
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] E-6 Imperfections




Re: [Frameworks] E-6
Imperfections
If the brown is transparent, it is not the opaque brown you get
when the film touches itself.
Is there any chance the color developer was contaminated by the
first developer? This can ruin the process. The best remedy would be
to mix all fresh chemistry.
-Pip






At 17:17 + 14/02/12, Kevin Timmins wrote:

So the problem... Ok now the films have come out great
overall but in parts there seems to be this light browny kind of layer
that fluidly move across the image, in parts it's centralized and in
others it's on the edges. Like I say overall the images are
clearly visible and sharp without much grain but there just seems to
me this brown mask that intermittently comes and goes. It's present on
both films I developed. Any ideas?



___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
  ___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks