[Bug 279122] /boot/kernel/kernel: "not stripped"

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279122

--- Comment #2 from Vinícius Zavam  ---
(In reply to Warner Losh from comment #1)

thank you for the feedback about it, much appreciated.

now, quick question: would it make sense to have an 'opt-in' flag added into
the installer (with proper warnings related to it)?

I assume certain conditions would also make sense to offer that additional flag
- e.g.: should the 'kernel-dbg.txz' be chosen as one of the DISTFILES, simply
do not offer to strip anything.

of course: I'm considering that when I want to get something tested or
debugged/troubleshooted myself, I just spin up a machine with as many default
settings as possible (that includes the non-stripped kernel as we offer today)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279398] Environment variable pointing to cross-compiler is not properly set in tools/build/make.py

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279398

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Spam|misc
   Assignee|bugmeis...@freebsd.org  |b...@freebsd.org
Product|Other   |Base System
Version|unspecified |Unspecified

--- Comment #1 from Mark Linimon  ---
^Triage: attempt to rescue this PR from the junkpile.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279403] typedef redeclaration in base include becoming an issue for DTrace

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279403

Bug ID: 279403
   Summary: typedef redeclaration in base include becoming an
issue for DTrace
   Product: Base System
   Version: 14.0-RELEASE
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: antran...@freebsd.am

root@srv0:~ # cat test.d

#include 

tcp:::accept-established
{
}

root@srv0:~ # dtrace -C -s test.d
dtrace: failed to compile script test.d: line 1: typedef redeclared: __uint8_t
root@srv0:~ # dtrace -H -C -s test.d
 /usr/include/sys/socket.h
. /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h
. /usr/include/sys/_types.h
.. /usr/include/machine/_types.h
... /usr/include/x86/_types.h
 /usr/include/machine/_limits.h
. /usr/include/x86/_limits.h
. /usr/include/sys/_iovec.h
. /usr/include/machine/_align.h
.. /usr/include/x86/_align.h
. /usr/include/sys/_sockaddr_storage.h
dtrace: failed to compile script test.d: line 1: typedef redeclared: __uint8_t
root@srv0:~ #

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 271826] FreeBSD is disastrously slow on a PowerMac G5, freezing at every command

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271826

--- Comment #26 from Denis Ahrens  ---
I tested the kernel from Mitch and sad news is that the problem is still there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 259833] Typo in rcorder(8)

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259833

Benedict Reuschling  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||b...@freebsd.org
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|New |Closed

--- Comment #1 from Benedict Reuschling  ---
This has been fixed in 47972d6dc4cb18cf2faf15181b9bdf482b92400d, but I forgot
to close this PR.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 271826] FreeBSD is disastrously slow on a PowerMac G5, freezing at every command

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271826

--- Comment #27 from Justin Hibbits  ---
(In reply to Denis Ahrens from comment #26)
Other big changes that are PPC970 relevant are in the pmap logic.  If you take
a look at the git log of sys/powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c and
sys/powerpc/aim/moea64_native.c, you can try to revert (git revert, or a
spiritual revert if there are conflicts) some of them and see what impacts.

Some options:

e2d6c417 (superpages)
a79540111 (micro-optimizations of PVO-PTE logic)
bc94b7009 (re-merge ISA3 HPT with moea64 native HPT) -- this one *will* have
conflicts.

Another shot in the dark is e44ed9d34 (atomics)

This is all just a guess based on trimming through `git diff
origin/releng/12.4..origin/releng/13.1 sys/powerpc`.  There may be other
issues, but these are the first I see as possibilities.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 271826] FreeBSD is disastrously slow on a PowerMac G5, freezing at every command

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271826

b...@desync.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||b...@desync.com

--- Comment #28 from b...@desync.com ---
Created attachment 251098
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=251098&action=edit
timebase sync hack

I'm not sure my symptoms exactly match what's described here, but it seems like
timebase sync may be broken on G5.  ofwcons freezes for about a minute every so
often, the fans go full blast at the same time because powermac_thermal is
hung.  The system is usually (always?) responsive over ssh while this is
happening.

Anyway, the attached hack seems to help in my case, as least.  Only tested on
the later PCIe dual and quad G5s.  I'm not sure timebase sync is even supported
on PCI-X powermacs (definitely not on my Xserve G5 with weird sync via I2C).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279403] typedef redeclaration in base include becoming an issue for DTrace

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279403

Mark Johnston  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ma...@freebsd.org
 Status|New |Open

--- Comment #1 from Mark Johnston  ---
Has this example ever worked on FreeBSD?

The problem isn't with duplicate typedefs; those are errors in C as well.

In dt_parser.c we have:

1451 /* 
1452  * If we are nested inside of a C include file, add the
declaration to  
1453  * the C definition module; otherwise use the D definition module. 
1454  */
1455 if (yypcb->pcb_idepth != 0)
1456 dmp = dtp->dt_cdefs;   
1457 else   
1458 dmp = dtp->dt_ddefs;

When we hit the error, we're actually using ddefs instead of cdefs, which is
incorrect according to the comment.  How is pcb_idepth set?  It's adjusted when
we see line control directives emitted by the processor, but it looks like our
version of the D lexer isn't handling this properly somehow.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279413] NTPD: Leap-Seconds.list IPv6 alone cannot be obtained and error occurs.

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279413

Bug ID: 279413
   Summary: NTPD: Leap-Seconds.list IPv6 alone cannot be obtained
and error occurs.
   Product: Base System
   Version: Unspecified
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: conf
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: tak...@airport.fm

bug #275419 Errors occur only in IPv6 after updating.

"HPiers.obspm.fr" Error that occurs because this host does not communicate with
IPv6.
No errors occur under dual stack with IPv4.

adhoc
# sysrc
ntp_leapfile_sources=https://data.iana.org/time-zones/tzdb/leap-seconds.list

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279415] requesting git tags for patch releases in (kernel) source repository

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279415

Bug ID: 279415
   Summary: requesting git tags for patch releases in (kernel)
source repository
   Product: Base System
   Version: 14.0-RELEASE
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Some People
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: nicholas.h.bri...@gmail.com

There are times it would be pretty handy to be able to "git diff" (or "git
shortlog") between patch releases in, for example, the releng/14.0 branch.

It seems as though it wouldn't be hard for the release engineering team to
apply a tag to the git repository after they have committed sources for a new
patch release.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279416] requesting git tags for patch releases in (kernel) source repository

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279416

Bug ID: 279416
   Summary: requesting git tags for patch releases in (kernel)
source repository
   Product: Base System
   Version: 14.0-RELEASE
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Some People
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: nicholas.h.bri...@gmail.com

There are times it would be pretty handy to be able to "git diff" (or "git
shortlog") between patch releases in, for example, the releng/14.0 branch.

It seems as though it wouldn't be hard for the release engineering team to
apply a tag to the git repository after they have committed sources for a new
patch release.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279416] requesting git tags for patch releases in (kernel) source repository

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279416

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|r...@freebsd.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279415] requesting git tags for patch releases in (kernel) source repository

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279415

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|New |Closed
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Mark Linimon  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 279416 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279415] requesting git tags for patch releases in (kernel) source repository

2024-05-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279415

--- Comment #2 from Nick Briggs  ---
Sorry - browser/bugzilla reported an error submitting the bug report when I
guess it did in fact submit it.  Thanks for cleaning up.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.