Re: k3b causing system freeze/panic
Szilveszter Adam szi...@bsd.hu writes: Also, if I remember correctly, for people with a bit more recent controllers ATA_CAM offers other advantages, but those do not affect me. So, for me ATA_CAM is just a better version of the ata(4) driver... It's the exact same driver, but plugged into CAM. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Panic booting vmware i386 after SRAT update
On Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:37:42 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have a 2 cpu virtual image of FreeBSD current. It panics during
boot after building in the NUMA support.
I'll transcribe the SRAT bootverbose messages and panic message as best I can.
Table 'SRAT' at 0xfef07f6
SRAT: Found table at 0xfef07f6
SRAT: Found memory domain 0 addr 0 len a: enabled
SRAT: Found memory domain 0 addr 10 len ff0: enabled
then some MADT: messages about finding cpu 0 and 1
cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0
cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1
panic: SRAT: CPU with APIC ID 0 is not known
I'm playing around now with trying to figure out what went missing,
but I thought I'd send this out now.
Hmm, check_domains() in srat.c should reject the SRAT table in this case.
Oh, I see the problem, try this:
Index: srat.c
===
--- srat.c (revision 210552)
+++ srat.c (working copy)
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@
for (i = 0; i num_mem; i++) {
found = 0;
for (j = 0; j = MAX_APIC_ID; j++)
- if (cpus[j].domain == mem_info[i].domain) {
+ if (cpus[j].enabled
+ cpus[j].domain == mem_info[i].domain) {
cpus[j].has_memory = 1;
found++;
}
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
/tmp and swap space
hi all: is it possible to create /tmp directory under swap space? under solaris, it is automatically created under swap unless one specifically instructs the system not to do so.. tia ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: /tmp and swap space
On 29 Jul 2010, at 16:35, gahn wrote: hi all: is it possible to create /tmp directory under swap space? under solaris, it is automatically created under swap unless one specifically instructs the system not to do so.. echo tmpmfs=YES /etc/rc.conf Regards, -- Rui Paulo ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: /tmp and swap space
On 29/07/2010 16:35, gahn wrote: is it possible to create /tmp directory under swap space? under solaris, it is automatically created under swap unless one specifically instructs the system not to do so.. Yes, this is certainly possible. Just add: tmpmfs=YES tmpsize=32m to /etc/rc.conf, and then either reboot, or run: /etc/rc.d/tmp start Note that this will mount a /tmp filesystem on top of anything that's already there, thus making those files inaccessible until you unmount again. (use whatever value of 32m you prefer, of course) Cheers, Matthew signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: /tmp and swap space
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 08:35:30AM -0700, gahn wrote: hi all: is it possible to create /tmp directory under swap space? Certainly; case in point: localhost(9.0-C)[4] uname -v FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #71 r210558M: Wed Jul 28 07:46:04 PDT 2010 r...@localhost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY localhost(9.0-C)[5] df -h /tmp FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on tmpfs 2.0G 12K2.0G 0%/tmp localhost(9.0-C)[6] under solaris, it is automatically created under swap unless one specifically instructs the system not to do so.. Quite so. What I do -- both in CURRENT as well as stable/7 and stable/8 -- is: localhost(9.0-C)[6] grep tmpfs /etc/fstab tmpfs /tmptmpfs rw,size=2g 0 0 localhost(9.0-C)[7] Note: doing this causes a message: WARNING: TMPFS is considered to be a highly experimental feature in FreeBSD. to be issued. That said, I've been using it quite a bit in the last couple of months, and have never had an issue with it of which I'm aware. The way I used to set up swap-backed /tmp was to have the following in /etc/rc.conf: # tmpmfs=YES # tmpsize=2048m # tmpmfs_flags=-i4096 -o async (but since I'm now using tmpfs, I commented the above out in /etc/rc.conf). Peace, david (a fan of swap-backed /tmp) -- David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. pgp9VJ5HTF6LC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Panic booting vmware i386 after SRAT update
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:18 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:37:42 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have a 2 cpu virtual image of FreeBSD current. It panics during
boot after building in the NUMA support.
I'll transcribe the SRAT bootverbose messages and panic message as best I
can.
Table 'SRAT' at 0xfef07f6
SRAT: Found table at 0xfef07f6
SRAT: Found memory domain 0 addr 0 len a: enabled
SRAT: Found memory domain 0 addr 10 len ff0: enabled
then some MADT: messages about finding cpu 0 and 1
cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0
cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1
panic: SRAT: CPU with APIC ID 0 is not known
I'm playing around now with trying to figure out what went missing,
but I thought I'd send this out now.
Hmm, check_domains() in srat.c should reject the SRAT table in this case.
Oh, I see the problem, try this:
Index: srat.c
===
--- srat.c (revision 210552)
+++ srat.c (working copy)
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@
for (i = 0; i num_mem; i++) {
found = 0;
for (j = 0; j = MAX_APIC_ID; j++)
- if (cpus[j].domain == mem_info[i].domain) {
+ if (cpus[j].enabled
+ cpus[j].domain == mem_info[i].domain) {
cpus[j].has_memory = 1;
found++;
}
This appears to fix the issue for me.
Thanks,
matthew
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: /tmp and swap space
On Jul 29, 2010, at 17:35, gahn wrote: hi all: is it possible to create /tmp directory under swap space? under solaris, it is automatically created under swap unless one specifically instructs the system not to do so.. Why not use tmpfs ? echo tmpfs /tmptmpfs rw 0 0 /etc/fstab mount /tmp -- Pawel___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Playing with Vnet in Jail on FreeBSD
I just published in my recent blog (this is the first post) about the use of Vnet Jail in FreeBSD. See and know what you think. http://world-unix.com/blog/2010/07/29/playing-with-vnet-in-jail-on-freebsd/ Thank you. -- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (41) 9844-3701 Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: /tmp and swap space
Hi gahn. 2010/7/29 gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com: hi all: is it possible to create /tmp directory under swap space? under solaris, it is automatically created under swap unless one specifically instructs the system not to do so.. Yes you can, by mounting a tmpfs there. fstab line: tmpfs /tmptmpfs rw 0 0 It uses swap space if neccessary. But beware: TMPFS is considered to be a highly experimental feature in FreeBSD. Well, the word highly is probably exaggerated, but if I remember correctly, there are still some rough edges (sendfile? double copies of its content? I'm not sure). I use it on my machines without problems. Regards Lucius ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Panic booting vmware i386 after SRAT update
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:18 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:37:42 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have a 2 cpu virtual image of FreeBSD current. It panics during
boot after building in the NUMA support.
I'll transcribe the SRAT bootverbose messages and panic message as best I
can.
Table 'SRAT' at 0xfef07f6
SRAT: Found table at 0xfef07f6
SRAT: Found memory domain 0 addr 0 len a: enabled
SRAT: Found memory domain 0 addr 10 len ff0: enabled
then some MADT: messages about finding cpu 0 and 1
cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0
cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1
panic: SRAT: CPU with APIC ID 0 is not known
I'm playing around now with trying to figure out what went missing,
but I thought I'd send this out now.
Hmm, check_domains() in srat.c should reject the SRAT table in this case.
Oh, I see the problem, try this:
Index: srat.c
===
--- srat.c (revision 210552)
+++ srat.c (working copy)
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@
for (i = 0; i num_mem; i++) {
found = 0;
for (j = 0; j = MAX_APIC_ID; j++)
- if (cpus[j].domain == mem_info[i].domain) {
+ if (cpus[j].enabled
+ cpus[j].domain == mem_info[i].domain) {
cpus[j].has_memory = 1;
found++;
}
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Works on amd64 kernel under VMWare, thanks!
dave c
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: firefox is stuck in getbuf()
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 16:29 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:58:00AM +0800, David Xu wrote: With newest -HEAD code, firefox is stuck in getbuf(). top last pid: 1814; load averages: 0.00, 0.05, 0.07 up 0+00:37:11 10:54:01 135 processes: 1 running, 134 sleeping CPU: 3.7% user, 0.0% nice, 0.6% system, 0.0% interrupt, 95.7% idle Mem: 259M Active, 393M Inact, 151M Wired, 1484K Cache, 111M Buf, 186M Free Swap: 2020M Total, 2020M Free PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1427 davidxu 1 450 114M 101M select 0 1:24 0.29% Xorg 1588 davidxu 10 440 279M 145M getbuf 0 2:15 0.00% firefox-bin procstat -k 1588 PIDTID COMM TDNAME KSTACK 1588 100200 firefox-bin initial thread mi_switch sleepq_switch sleepq_wait _sleep getdirtybuf flush_deplist softdep_sync_metadata ffs_syncvnode ffs_fsync VOP_FSYNC_APV fsync syscallenter syscall Xint0x80_syscall 1588 100207 firefox-bin -mi_switch sleepq_switch sleepq_catch_signals sleepq_wait_sig _cv_wait_sig seltdwait poll syscallenter syscall Xint0x80_syscall 1588 100208 firefox-bin -mi_switch sleepq_switch sleepq_catch_signals sleepq_wait_sig _sleep __umtx_op_cv_wait _umtx_op syscallenter syscall Xint0x80_syscall 1588 100209 firefox-bin -mi_switch sleepq_switch sleepq_catch_signals sleepq_timedwait_sig _sleep __umtx_op_cv_wait _umtx_op syscallenter syscall Xint0x80_syscall 1588 100210 firefox-bin -mi_switch sleepq_switch sleepq_catch_signals sleepq_timedwait_sig _sleep __umtx_op_cv_wait _umtx_op syscallenter syscall Xint0x80_syscall 1588 100216 firefox-bin -mi_switch sleepq_switch sleepq_catch_signals sleepq_wait_sig _sleep __umtx_op_cv_wait _umtx_op syscallenter syscall Xint0x80_syscall 1588 100220 firefox-bin -mi_switch sleepq_switch sleepq_wait _sleep getdirtybuf flush_deplist softdep_sync_metadata ffs_syncvnode ffs_fsync VOP_FSYNC_APV fsync syscallenter syscall Xint0x80_syscall 1588 100238 firefox-bin -mi_switch sleepq_switch sleepq_catch_signals sleepq_wait_sig _sleep __umtx_op_cv_wait _umtx_op syscallenter syscall Xint0x80_syscall 1588 100239 firefox-bin -mi_switch sleepq_switch sleepq_catch_signals sleepq_wait_sig _sleep __umtx_op_cv_wait _umtx_op syscallenter syscall Xint0x80_syscall 1588 100240 firefox-bin -mi_switch sleepq_switch sleepq_catch_signals sleepq_wait_sig _sleep __umtx_op_cv_wait _umtx_op syscallenter syscall Xint0x80_syscall Can you, please, do the following: show the backtraces for the system processes, in particular, syncer, bufdaemon, softdepflush daemon, pagedaemon and vm ? for the stuck firefox thread, find the address of the buffer supplied as an argument to getdirtybuf, and print the *(struct buf *)addr ? This can be done on the live/stuck system using kgdb on /dev/mem. I can relatively easily recreate this, see my thread on -current on the 17th July (Filesystem wedge, SUJ-related?), which (and the followup emails) contain additional info. I'm currently trying to find the commit responsible for introducing this, and have established that a OK, sorry for the delay. I have the information requested. Please see http://people.freebsd.org/~gavin/rho-fs-hang.txt I've started to try and narrow down where exactly the hangs started: r208700 - June 1st - seems to work fime r209425 - June 22st - hangs occur If you need any more info, let me know. Thanks, Gavin ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
