Re: WARNING: su(1) broken in head

2012-05-27 Thread Doug Barton
On 05/26/2012 16:36, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
 Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
 probably due to an issue in the latest openpam; sudo is not affected
 
 should be fixed now.

Confirmed, thanks. :)


-- 

This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: [CFT][CFR] Resurrect handling of VersionAddendum in OpenSSH

2012-05-27 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Sat, May 26, 2012 at 02:34:20PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
 Can anyone who uses SSH test this patch and report their findings
 to the respective PR.  Also, code reviews are welcome too.

I head been blessed by des@ to commit the code into -CURRENT
and I did so,
  http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=236139
so people who run HEAD will automatically receive this fix
starting from now.
-- 
Eygene Ryabinkin,,,^..^,,,
[ Life's unfair - but root password helps!   | codelabs.ru ]
[ 82FE 06BC D497 C0DE 49EC  4FF0 16AF 9EAE 8152 ECFB | freebsd.org ]


pgp7UPlMJwV5C.pgp
Description: PGP signature


OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc completeness

2012-05-27 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
Hi!

I'm running a little pet project of improving completeness of
tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc file and thus delete-old*
targets with regard to all possible WITHOUT_* knobs.

E.g. when WITHOUT_foo is defined in src.conf, make delete-old should
remove related files completely, to make a system look exactly like
it's world was installed with that knob set.

First of all, an automatic script to check for leftovers after
delete-old for all possible knobs is available from [2]. Feel free
to run in on different architectures and FreeBSD branches; I'm
currently running it on amd64. I also think that it should be run
during preparation of each FreeBSD release.

There are some questions I'd like to discuss.

1) named config file var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf was intentionally
left out from OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc, so I did the same for other
configs which may be changed by users. Since this approach requires
maintaining a whitelist of such files to ignore them in checking
leftovers, I think it'd be better to introduce special variable for
config files, e.g. OLD_CONFIGS and corresponding target,
delete-old-configs, which will by default remove configs interactively,
with an option to remove them in batch mode.

2) Is this ok to backport the list from current to stable branches? Pro
- it's really simple, con - it will contain files never installed with
this (old) branch.

I also plan to make similar script for checking completeness of
delete-old* targets for the case of system update.

[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/168341
[2] https://github.com/AMDmi3/obsolete-files-checker

-- 
Dmitry Marakasov   .   55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56  9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amd...@amdmi3.ru  ..:  jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: WARNING - DO NOT test: IPv6 offload support in HEAD + patch for stable/9

2012-05-27 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 26. May 2012, at 14:01 , Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:

Hey.

 WARNING - please refrain from testing IPv6 or updating your HEAD if you do
 not have any of the above two NICs and rely on IPv6, or if you have updated 
 and
 are experiencing problems.  Disabling -txcsum -tso for the moment should be an
 often unhelpful workaround.  It seems I was just lucky with my choice of other

It was not, as there was a further bug, which was fixed last night with

http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/236130


To fix the full problem, here's a proposed patch for testing on the latest
HEAD or review:

http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20120527-02-fix-v6-csum-offload.diff


I'd be happy to hear back from anyone on short notice that it works for him,
and I'll get it in for (possible) further refinements.

/bz

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
   It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Repeated build failures in expr due to yyparse

2012-05-27 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
Running a make -s -j5 buildworld;  cleaned the entire obj tree meanwhile.
Builds are running on a slightly older HEAD thought with an updated libc
and some headers.

I can reproduce this all the time.  Buildworld at this stage should be
self-contained, right?  So why is it failing?

=== bin/expr (all)
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/zoo/bz/HEAD.svn/bin/expr/expr.y: In function 'main':
/zoo/bz/HEAD.svn/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: implicit declaration of function 
'yyparse'
/zoo/bz/HEAD.svn/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: nested extern declaration of 
'yyparse'
expr.c: At top level:
expr.c:813: warning: no previous prototype for 'yyparse'
*** Error code 1


-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
   It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148

2012-05-27 Thread Rainer Hurling
Yesterday r236148 (Allow inclusion of libc++ cmath to work after 
including math.h) was comitted to head, many thanks.


Does this mean, that extra long double functions like acoshl, expm1l or 
log1pl are now really implemented? As far as I understand, they had 
only been declared before?


If this is right, are they usable on a recent CURRENT, built with gcc42 
(system compiler), by ports which use gcc46 (not clang)? If not, are 
there any plans to implement these functions in the near future?


The use of C99 extra long double functions would be of interest for 
example for programs like math/R, especially its upcoming releases.


Many thanks for any clarification.

Regards,
Rainer Hurling
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org