Re: [new DESTDIR, DESTDIR/boot/modules]: kldxref: /diskless/boot/modules: Not a directory

2013-06-07 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 06/06/2013 22:03 Boris Samorodov said the following:
 I try to use (a new and empty) DESTDIR and get this error at
 installkernel:

I think that 'make hierarchy' is expected in this case before any installation
actions.

-- 
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: [new DESTDIR, DESTDIR/boot/modules]: kldxref: /diskless/boot/modules: Not a directory

2013-06-07 Thread Boris Samorodov
07.06.2013 10:24, Andriy Gapon пишет:
 on 06/06/2013 22:03 Boris Samorodov said the following:
 I try to use (a new and empty) DESTDIR and get this error at
 installkernel:
 
 I think that 'make hierarchy' is expected in this case before any installation
 actions.

Thanks, that was helpful. I've found the culprit. That was me. :-)
I used to use installkernel installworld. But for a new
installation that should be the other way round.

-- 
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: Can't compile lxpanel

2013-06-07 Thread Jakub Lach
Sorry for being so sparse, but I was just talking about
general impression from few tries I gave it. 

/proc wasn't main problem, usually I didn;t have any use 
for it.

Basically it wasn't for me what it aimed to be- a frugal 
replacement for DE. Half of things didn't work, other half 
worked erratically. Starting from bare panel/openbox looked 
more viable.



--
View this message in context: 
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Can-t-compile-lxpanel-tp5817985p5818453.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


10-CURRENT i386 memstick snapshots broken?

2013-06-07 Thread Jimmy
Greetings -

I had originally started playing with the 10-CURRENT amd64 release
a couple of months ago (no complaints here - keep up the good work!)
and had used the memstick snapshot to set things up back then with
no problems.

Now I'd like to wipe everything and switch to the i386 version, but
the memstick images (all of the last 4 or 5) seem to be broken.
My machine sees that the USB stick is there, but won't boot off of
it at all.  When I do 'fdisk' on /dev/da0 with the i386 stuff loaded,
I get a invalid partition error, so on a hunch I decided to take a
closer look at the memstick images using
 dd if=xxx-memstick bs=512 count=1 | hd
The amd64 images look like what I would expect: some bootblock code
with a partition table at the end and the a5 type marker.  The i386
image, however, is ALL '00'.  It would appear the whatever puts those
memstick images together (src/release/i386/make-memstick.sh, perhaps?)
is failing for some reason.

Has anyone else tried the i386 memstick and having the same problem?

Jimmy
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 10-CURRENT i386 memstick snapshots broken?

2013-06-07 Thread Glen Barber
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:51:29PM -0500, Jimmy wrote:
 Greetings -
 
 I had originally started playing with the 10-CURRENT amd64 release
 a couple of months ago (no complaints here - keep up the good work!)
 and had used the memstick snapshot to set things up back then with
 no problems.
 
 Now I'd like to wipe everything and switch to the i386 version, but
 the memstick images (all of the last 4 or 5) seem to be broken.
 My machine sees that the USB stick is there, but won't boot off of
 it at all.  When I do 'fdisk' on /dev/da0 with the i386 stuff loaded,
 I get a invalid partition error, so on a hunch I decided to take a
 closer look at the memstick images using
  dd if=xxx-memstick bs=512 count=1 | hd
 The amd64 images look like what I would expect: some bootblock code
 with a partition table at the end and the a5 type marker.  The i386
 image, however, is ALL '00'.  It would appear the whatever puts those
 memstick images together (src/release/i386/make-memstick.sh, perhaps?)
 is failing for some reason.
 
 Has anyone else tried the i386 memstick and having the same problem?
 

Hmm.  Thanks for the report.  I'll take a look at the logs for i386, but
they are generated the same way as the amd64, so in theory should not
have any noticable difference.

Glen



pgpXEttKEd1kP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: 10-CURRENT i386 memstick snapshots broken?

2013-06-07 Thread Hans Petter Selasky

On 06/07/13 22:51, Jimmy wrote:

Greetings -

I had originally started playing with the 10-CURRENT amd64 release
a couple of months ago (no complaints here - keep up the good work!)
and had used the memstick snapshot to set things up back then with
no problems.

Now I'd like to wipe everything and switch to the i386 version, but
the memstick images (all of the last 4 or 5) seem to be broken.
My machine sees that the USB stick is there, but won't boot off of
it at all.  When I do 'fdisk' on /dev/da0 with the i386 stuff loaded,
I get a invalid partition error, so on a hunch I decided to take a
closer look at the memstick images using
  dd if=xxx-memstick bs=512 count=1 | hd
The amd64 images look like what I would expect: some bootblock code
with a partition table at the end and the a5 type marker.  The i386
image, however, is ALL '00'.  It would appear the whatever puts those
memstick images together (src/release/i386/make-memstick.sh, perhaps?)
is failing for some reason.

Has anyone else tried the i386 memstick and having the same problem?

Jimmy


Hi,

The memstick images does not contain an MBR. That's why some bioses 
won't boot them.


You can fix this by using:

fdisk -BI /dev/daX

dd if=xxx.img of=/dev/daXs1 count=65536

--HPS

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Can't compile lxpanel

2013-06-07 Thread Walter Hurry
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:58:50 -0700, Jakub Lach wrote:

 Sorry for being so sparse, but I was just talking about general
 impression from few tries I gave it.
 
 /proc wasn't main problem, usually I didn;t have any use for it.
 
 Basically it wasn't for me what it aimed to be- a frugal replacement for
 DE. Half of things didn't work, other half worked erratically. Starting
 from bare panel/openbox looked more viable.
 
OK, fair enough. All I can say is that LXDE works perfectly for me in 9.1-
RELEASE. I just had the problem of compiling lxpanel in 10-CURRENT, which 
was worked around using asomers' suggestion to try gcc instead of clang 
for that port.

Thanks for the reply.

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2013-06-07 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:17 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE 
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:17 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:17 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:17 - /usr/local/bin/svn stat /src
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:21 - At svn revision 251515
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:22 - building world
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:22 - CROSS_BUILD_TESTING=YES
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:22 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:22 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:22 - SRCCONF=/dev/null
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:22 - TARGET=arm
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:22 - TARGET_ARCH=arm
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:22 - TZ=UTC
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:22 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:22 - cd /src
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:22 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld
 Building an up-to-date make(1)
 World build started on Sat Jun  8 00:40:29 UTC 2013
 Rebuilding the temporary build tree
 stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims
 stage 1.2: bootstrap tools
 stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree
 stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree
 stage 2.3: build tools
 stage 3: cross tools
 stage 4.1: building includes
 stage 4.2: building libraries
[...]
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make: stopped in /src
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make: stopped in /src
*** Error code 1

Stop in /src.
TB --- 2013-06-08 01:49:19 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code  1 
TB --- 2013-06-08 01:49:19 - ERROR: failed to build world
TB --- 2013-06-08 01:49:19 - 3623.03 user 389.12 system 4141.62 real


http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/tinderbox-head-build-HEAD-arm-arm.full
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


[head tinderbox] failure on armv6/arm

2013-06-07 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:17 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE 
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:17 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for armv6/arm
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:17 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:17 - /usr/local/bin/svn stat /src
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:22 - At svn revision 251515
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:23 - building world
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:23 - CROSS_BUILD_TESTING=YES
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:23 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:23 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:23 - SRCCONF=/dev/null
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:23 - TARGET=arm
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:23 - TARGET_ARCH=armv6
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:23 - TZ=UTC
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:23 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:23 - cd /src
TB --- 2013-06-08 00:40:23 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld
 Building an up-to-date make(1)
 World build started on Sat Jun  8 00:40:29 UTC 2013
 Rebuilding the temporary build tree
 stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims
 stage 1.2: bootstrap tools
 stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree
 stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree
 stage 2.3: build tools
 stage 3: cross tools
 stage 4.1: building includes
 stage 4.2: building libraries
[...]
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make: stopped in /src
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make: stopped in /src
*** Error code 1

Stop in /src.
TB --- 2013-06-08 01:49:17 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code  1 
TB --- 2013-06-08 01:49:17 - ERROR: failed to build world
TB --- 2013-06-08 01:49:17 - 3626.02 user 386.34 system 4140.15 real


http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/tinderbox-head-build-HEAD-armv6-arm.full
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org