FreeBSD 10-BETA3 - zfs clone of zvol snapshot is not created
Hi, am I doing something wrong, ZFS does not support that or there is a bug that zvol clone does not show up under /dev/zvol after creating it from other zvol snapshot? # zfs list -t all | grep local local 136G 76.8G 144K none local/home117G 76.8G 117G /home local/vm 18.4G 76.8G 144K none local/vm/vbox_pcbsd_10 5.35G 76.8G 5.35G - local/vm/vbox_windows_7 10.8G 76.8G 9.86G - local/vm/vbox_windows_7@clean 940M - 8.12G - local/vm/vbox_windows_xp 2.27G 76.8G 2.16G - local/vm/vbox_windows_xp@clean109M - 1.07G - # zfs clone local/vm/vbox_windows_7@clean local/vm/vbox_windows_7_personal # zfs list -t all | grep local local 136G 76.8G 144K none local/home117G 76.8G 117G /home local/vm 18.4G 76.8G 144K none local/vm/vbox_pcbsd_10 5.35G 76.8G 5.35G - local/vm/vbox_windows_7 10.8G 76.8G 9.86G - local/vm/vbox_windows_7@clean 940M - 8.12G - local/vm/vbox_windows_7_personal8K 76.8G 8.12G - local/vm/vbox_windows_xp 2.27G 76.8G 2.16G - local/vm/vbox_windows_xp@clean109M - 1.07G - # find /dev/zvol /dev/zvol /dev/zvol/local /dev/zvol/local/vm /dev/zvol/local/vm/vbox_pcbsd_10 /dev/zvol/local/vm/vbox_windows_7 /dev/zvol/local/vm/vbox_windows_7@clean /dev/zvol/local/vm/vbox_windows_xp /dev/zvol/local/vm/vbox_windows_xp@clean /dev/zvol/local/vm/vbox_pcbsd_10p1 /dev/zvol/local/vm/vbox_pcbsd_10p2 /dev/zvol/local/vm/vbox_windows_7@cleans1 /dev/zvol/local/vm/vbox_windows_xps1 /dev/zvol/local/vm/vbox_windows_xp@cleans1 ... the missing clone: /dev/zvol/local/vm/vbox_windows_7_personal Regards, vermaden ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD PVH guest support
Hello, I've updated the branch one more time in order to cope with the recent HEAD changes regarding SMAP parsing, as usual the branch can be found at: http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/royger/freebsd.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pvh_v5 Also, I've created a wiki page that describes how to set up a FreeBSD PVH guest: http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/FreeBSD_PVH In case anyone wants to give it a try :) Thanks. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: i386 update to latest -HEAD broke things
On 22 Nov 2013, at 04:23, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I just updated a laptop from a month old -HEAD to the latest -HEAD. > Things .. didn't work. > > * No processes ran - they'd complain about being out of anonymous memory > * /rescue/sh works fine, but /rescue/dhclient seems to be doing the > wrong thing with regards to which dhclient-script it calls > * .. and /rescue/dhclient-script also references things in /, which > doesn't work. Grr. > > Anyway: > > * copying over a replacement ld.so from an i386 image from the 11th > restored basic binaries, but things like fsck would randomly crap out > * copying over the conents of /lib let things get further, but ssh > died (jemalloc arena complaints, so I'm guessing maybe there's > something odd going on here..) > * copying over the contents of /usr/lib didn't improve things; > * copying over the contents of /usr/lib/private fixed things enough to > get ssh up so I can svn update to an earlier version. > > I'm currently rebuilding r258446 (one before the first weak reference > change) to make sure that this userland is stable. If it works out, > I'll try subsequent versions. I think the fix for llvm PR 15086 (done in r258455) is causing these problems, since upstream apparently reported miscompilations with it (which I haven't seen, but maybe I was just lucky). I will revert that tonight after $WORK, but if you can test reverting it locally, please do. -Dimitry signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: bind9 remnants
Hello,
2013/11/14 Herbert J. Skuhra
>
> to. 14. nov. 2013 kl. 11.02 +0100 skrev Olivier Smedts:
>
>
> Hello,
>>
>> cc'ing glebius since he committed r257694 ("Remove remnants of BIND from
>> /etc, since there is no BIND in base now.") which removed remnants of BIND
>> from /etc but not from /usr/src/etc.
>>
>> Can we please remove bind9 references from etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist ?
>> /usr/share/doc/bind9, /usr/share/doc/bind9/arm and
>> /usr/share/doc/bind9/misc are constantly re-created during a "make
>> installworld" or "make hierarchy" and are then removed by "make
>> delete-old". I'm using stable/10 right now, where r257694 has been MFCed
>> as
>> r258121.
>>
>
> It's already in HEAD:
>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=256769
>
Is there a reason (other than ENOTIME) why it has not been MFCed to
stable/10 yet ? It's not critical but would make a cleaner 10.0-RELEASE.
Thanks
--
Olivier Smedts _
ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org- against HTML email & vCards X
www: http://www.gid0.org- against proprietary attachments / \
"Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde :
ceux qui comprennent le binaire,
et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas."
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: VIA Sprinboard: Alternative to Raspberry Pi - working with FBSD CURRENT?
from O. Hartmann: > Recently, > I stumbled into this board, which looks promising: > http://www.viaspringboard.com/products.html > Does anybody know whether the offered hardware (chipse, CPU, WiFi > chipset) is supported by FreeBSD? I went to that URL and noticed that the WiFi chip was Atheros AR9271, same as one I have and not currently supported by FreeBSD but maybe supported in NetBSD-current and Linux. I couldn't tell on my own whether the rest of the system could run FreeBSD or NetBSD, but from Ian Lepore's response, it doesn't look good. Better off with Raspberry Pi? Tom ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: i386 update to latest -HEAD broke things
On 22 November 2013 01:11, Andreas Tobler wrote: > - Original Message > From: Adrian Chadd > To: freebsd-current > Subject: Re: i386 update to latest -HEAD broke things > Date: 22/11/13 10:05 > >> r258446 built, installed and booted fine. I'll try a more recent i386 >> in a chroot soon. >> >> Would someone please double-check -HEAD on i386 and see if it's ok? > > Rebuild on i386 is in progress. Native, will take some time. I suggest installing it in a chroot rather than over the live system. :) -adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: i386 update to latest -HEAD broke things
- Original Message From: Adrian Chadd To: freebsd-current Subject: Re: i386 update to latest -HEAD broke things Date: 22/11/13 10:05 > r258446 built, installed and booted fine. I'll try a more recent i386 > in a chroot soon. > > Would someone please double-check -HEAD on i386 and see if it's ok? Rebuild on i386 is in progress. Native, will take some time. Andreas ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: i386 update to latest -HEAD broke things
r258446 built, installed and booted fine. I'll try a more recent i386 in a chroot soon. Would someone please double-check -HEAD on i386 and see if it's ok? Thanks, -adrian On 21 November 2013 19:23, Adrian Chadd wrote: > hi, > > I just updated a laptop from a month old -HEAD to the latest -HEAD. > Things .. didn't work. > > * No processes ran - they'd complain about being out of anonymous memory > * /rescue/sh works fine, but /rescue/dhclient seems to be doing the > wrong thing with regards to which dhclient-script it calls > * .. and /rescue/dhclient-script also references things in /, which > doesn't work. Grr. > > Anyway: > > * copying over a replacement ld.so from an i386 image from the 11th > restored basic binaries, but things like fsck would randomly crap out > * copying over the conents of /lib let things get further, but ssh > died (jemalloc arena complaints, so I'm guessing maybe there's > something odd going on here..) > * copying over the contents of /usr/lib didn't improve things; > * copying over the contents of /usr/lib/private fixed things enough to > get ssh up so I can svn update to an earlier version. > > I'm currently rebuilding r258446 (one before the first weak reference > change) to make sure that this userland is stable. If it works out, > I'll try subsequent versions. > > Just be careful. :-0 > > > > -adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
