13.0-RELEASE bsdinstall failure : looked for MANIFEST in wrong place (not with *.txz files)

2021-04-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
Booted RPi4 via micrsd card dd'd from:

FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-RPI.img

I attempted a bsdinstall onto a USB3 SSD. The following
reports what happened.

# bsdinstall

default keymap Select
Hostname OK
ftp mirror OK
Auto (ZFS) OK
Install Select
stripe OK
[*] da0 OK
Last Chance! da0 YES

Error while fetching
file:///usr/freebsd-dist/MANIFEST │
: No such file or directory

OK
Exit

NOTE: the path is /usr/freebsd-dist/MANIFEST instead
of /mnt/usr/freebsd-dist/MANIFEST but . . .

# df -m
Filesystem 1M-blocks Used  Avail Capacity  Mounted on
/dev/ufs/rootfs28862 3217  2333612%/
devfs  00  0   100%/dev
/dev/msdosfs/MSDOSBOOT49   24 2549%/boot/msdos
tmpfs 500 49 1%/tmp
zroot/ROOT/default197406  183 197222 0%/mnt
zroot/tmp 1972220 197222 0%/mnt/tmp
zroot/usr/home1972220 197222 0%/mnt/usr/home
zroot/usr/ports   1972220 197222 0%/mnt/usr/ports
zroot/usr/src 1972220 197222 0%/mnt/usr/src
zroot/var/audit   1972220 197222 0%/mnt/var/audit
zroot/var/crash   1972220 197222 0%/mnt/var/crash
zroot/var/log 1972220 197222 0%/mnt/var/log
zroot/var/mail1972220 197222 0%/mnt/var/mail
zroot/var/tmp 1972220 197222 0%/mnt/var/tmp
zroot 1972220 197222 0%/mnt/zroot

# ls -Tla /mnt/usr/freebsd-dist/
total 187454
drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel  4 Apr  9 07:39:20 2021 .
drwxr-xr-x  6 root  wheel  6 Apr  9 07:39:20 2021 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  165248188 Apr  9 07:39:20 2021 base.txz
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   26552108 Apr  9 07:39:21 2021 kernel.txz

# ls -Tla /usr/freebsd-dist/
ls: /usr/freebsd-dist/: No such file or directory


NOTE: creating /usr/freebsd-dist/ with a copy of the MANIFEST
file in it was enough to get past this issue: it is doing
Archive Extraction now.

===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: NFS issues since upgrading to 13-RELEASE

2021-04-16 Thread Rick Macklem
Just fyi, I just got a "recursed on non-recursed mutex" panic in
socantrcvmore() with the D29690 patch, so you might not
want to test with that one yet.

rick


From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org  on 
behalf of Olav Gjerde 
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 3:21 PM
To: Allan Jude
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NFS issues since upgrading to 13-RELEASE

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to ith...@uoguelph.ca


Well something do happen if I restart NFS Service on FreeBSD , it works for
like 10 seconds then it gets unresponsive again.

This is my output from `nfsstat -d 1`

0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
8.00  10258.00  8.02 17170  134.54  2.01 72716  142.54  0.07  51  34
8.00  2273   17.76  7.99 31273  244.07  2.01 133267  261.83  0.14  20  82
8.03  4889   38.33  7.99 25885  202.07  2.06 119340  240.40  0.13  21  81
[= Read =]  [= Write ]  [=== Total ]
KB/t   tpsMB/s  KB/t   tpsMB/s  KB/t   tpsMB/sms  ql  %b
7.98  8811   68.64  8.00 12997  101.54  2.22 78396  170.18  0.15   1  80
7.99   9227.20  8.00  3798   29.68  2.10 17965   36.87  0.09   0  11
8.07  2959   23.31  0.00 00.00  2.67  8938   23.31  0.86  32  72
7.97  7088   55.18  0.00 00.00  2.66 21233   55.18  1.05  16  98
7.98  4666   36.38  0.00 00.00  2.66 13986   36.38  0.36   9  29
8.00  4513   35.24  8.00  7662   59.86  2.20 44188   95.10  0.27  10  49
7.98  4799   37.40  8.00 11422   89.23  2.16 60076  126.63  0.19   0  51
8.00  4322   33.76  0.00 00.00  2.67 12967   33.76  0.89   0  42
8.02  4839   37.91  0.00 00.00  2.67 14550   37.91  0.54  17  41
8.01  4516   35.32  0.00 00.00  2.67 13569   35.32  0.57  27  38
7.95  4459   34.62  8.00  11959.34  2.49 18109   43.96  0.55   0  45
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0
0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00 00.00  0.00   0   0



On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 9:07 PM Olav Gjerde  wrote:

> I have the same issue, using Ubuntu 20.10 with Linux 5.8 kernel. The Linux
> NFS client will get unresponsive and it does not recover in my case, even
> if I restart NFS on FreeBSD. I upgraded from FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE though.
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 8:36 PM Allan Jude  wrote:
>
>> On 4/15/2021 9:22 AM, Chris Roose wrote:
>> > I posted this in -questions and someone suggested I post here as well.
>> >
>> > I'm having NFS availability issues between my Proxmox client and
>> FreeBSD server (10G link) since upgrading to 13-RELEASE. And unfortunately
>> I upgraded my ZFS pool to v2.0.0 before I noticed the issue, so I'm kind of
>> stuck.
>> >
>> > Periodically, the NFS server (I've tried both v3 and v4.2 clients) will
>> go unresponsive for several minutes. I never had this problem on 12.2, and
>> as far as I can tell it's not a disk or network I/O issue. I'll get several
>> "nfs: server not responding, still trying" messages on the client and a few
>> minutes later it usually recovers. It's not clear to me yet what's causing
>> the block. Restarting nfsd on the server will resolve the issue if it
>> doesn't clear itself.
>> >
>> > Any pointers for troubleshooting this? I've been lookin

Re: sys/sys/param.h: 'main' instead of 'Master'?

2021-04-16 Thread Warner Losh
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:20 PM Michael Gmelin  wrote:

>
>
> > On 16. Apr 2021, at 19:29, Rodney W. Grimes <
> freebsd-...@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> >
> > 
> >>
> >> n Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:36 AM Rainer Hurling  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> While viewing sys/sys/param.h I noticed that the comment of the
> >>> definition of __FreeBSD_version is probably out of date.
> >>>
> >>> Since the switch to Git, doesn't it have to be 'main' instead of
> 'master'?
> >>>
> >>
> >> This isn't based on a branch name, though I guess if one were going to
> >> touch it anyways then "Authoritative" would be a better descriptor.
> >
> > As well as "Origin".
>
> (Single) Source of Truth, maybe?
>

s/Master, p/P/ also makes sense.

Warner


> -m
>
> >
> >>
> >>> #cd /usr/src
> >>> #diff -urN sys/sys/param.h.orig sys/sys/param.h | colordiff
> >>> --- sys/sys/param.h.orig2021-04-09 12:59:25.363286000 +0200
> >>> +++ sys/sys/param.h 2021-04-16 18:28:46.621429000 +0200
> >>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
> >>>  * in the range 5 to 9.
> >>>  */
> >>> #undef __FreeBSD_version
> >>> -#define __FreeBSD_version 147  /* Master, propagated to
> newvers */
> >>> +#define __FreeBSD_version 147  /* main, propagated to newvers
> */
> >>>
> >>> /*
> >>>  * __FreeBSD_kernel__ indicates that this system uses the kernel of
> >>> FreeBSD,
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> >> ___
> >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Rod Grimes
> rgri...@freebsd.org
> > ___
> > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
> ___
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: sys/sys/param.h: 'main' instead of 'Master'?

2021-04-16 Thread Michael Gmelin


> On 16. Apr 2021, at 19:29, Rodney W. Grimes  
> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> n Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:36 AM Rainer Hurling  wrote:
>>> 
>>> While viewing sys/sys/param.h I noticed that the comment of the
>>> definition of __FreeBSD_version is probably out of date.
>>> 
>>> Since the switch to Git, doesn't it have to be 'main' instead of 'master'?
>>> 
>> 
>> This isn't based on a branch name, though I guess if one were going to
>> touch it anyways then "Authoritative" would be a better descriptor.
> 
> As well as "Origin".

(Single) Source of Truth, maybe?

-m

> 
>> 
>>> #cd /usr/src
>>> #diff -urN sys/sys/param.h.orig sys/sys/param.h | colordiff
>>> --- sys/sys/param.h.orig2021-04-09 12:59:25.363286000 +0200
>>> +++ sys/sys/param.h 2021-04-16 18:28:46.621429000 +0200
>>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
>>>  * in the range 5 to 9.
>>>  */
>>> #undef __FreeBSD_version
>>> -#define __FreeBSD_version 147  /* Master, propagated to newvers */
>>> +#define __FreeBSD_version 147  /* main, propagated to newvers */
>>> 
>>> /*
>>>  * __FreeBSD_kernel__ indicates that this system uses the kernel of
>>> FreeBSD,
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>> ___
>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org
> ___
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: sys/sys/param.h: 'main' instead of 'Master'?

2021-04-16 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> n Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:36 AM Rainer Hurling  wrote:
> >
> > While viewing sys/sys/param.h I noticed that the comment of the
> > definition of __FreeBSD_version is probably out of date.
> >
> > Since the switch to Git, doesn't it have to be 'main' instead of 'master'?
> >
> 
> This isn't based on a branch name, though I guess if one were going to
> touch it anyways then "Authoritative" would be a better descriptor.

As well as "Origin".

> 
> > #cd /usr/src
> > #diff -urN sys/sys/param.h.orig sys/sys/param.h | colordiff
> > --- sys/sys/param.h.orig2021-04-09 12:59:25.363286000 +0200
> > +++ sys/sys/param.h 2021-04-16 18:28:46.621429000 +0200
> > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
> >   * in the range 5 to 9.
> >   */
> >  #undef __FreeBSD_version
> > -#define __FreeBSD_version 147  /* Master, propagated to newvers */
> > +#define __FreeBSD_version 147  /* main, propagated to newvers */
> >
> >  /*
> >   * __FreeBSD_kernel__ indicates that this system uses the kernel of
> > FreeBSD,
> >
> > ___
> > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> ___
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> 

-- 
Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: sys/sys/param.h: 'main' instead of 'Master'?

2021-04-16 Thread Rainer Hurling
Am 16.04.21 um 18:38 schrieb Kyle Evans:
> n Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:36 AM Rainer Hurling  wrote:
>>
>> While viewing sys/sys/param.h I noticed that the comment of the
>> definition of __FreeBSD_version is probably out of date.
>>
>> Since the switch to Git, doesn't it have to be 'main' instead of 'master'?
>>
> 
> This isn't based on a branch name, though I guess if one were going to
> touch it anyways then "Authoritative" would be a better descriptor.

Sounds reasonable. Thanks for the explanation.

> 
>> #cd /usr/src
>> #diff -urN sys/sys/param.h.orig sys/sys/param.h | colordiff
>> --- sys/sys/param.h.orig2021-04-09 12:59:25.363286000 +0200
>> +++ sys/sys/param.h 2021-04-16 18:28:46.621429000 +0200
>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
>>   * in the range 5 to 9.
>>   */
>>  #undef __FreeBSD_version
>> -#define __FreeBSD_version 147  /* Master, propagated to newvers */
>> +#define __FreeBSD_version 147  /* main, propagated to newvers */
>>
>>  /*
>>   * __FreeBSD_kernel__ indicates that this system uses the kernel of
>> FreeBSD,
>>
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: sys/sys/param.h: 'main' instead of 'Master'?

2021-04-16 Thread Kyle Evans
n Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:36 AM Rainer Hurling  wrote:
>
> While viewing sys/sys/param.h I noticed that the comment of the
> definition of __FreeBSD_version is probably out of date.
>
> Since the switch to Git, doesn't it have to be 'main' instead of 'master'?
>

This isn't based on a branch name, though I guess if one were going to
touch it anyways then "Authoritative" would be a better descriptor.

> #cd /usr/src
> #diff -urN sys/sys/param.h.orig sys/sys/param.h | colordiff
> --- sys/sys/param.h.orig2021-04-09 12:59:25.363286000 +0200
> +++ sys/sys/param.h 2021-04-16 18:28:46.621429000 +0200
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
>   * in the range 5 to 9.
>   */
>  #undef __FreeBSD_version
> -#define __FreeBSD_version 147  /* Master, propagated to newvers */
> +#define __FreeBSD_version 147  /* main, propagated to newvers */
>
>  /*
>   * __FreeBSD_kernel__ indicates that this system uses the kernel of
> FreeBSD,
>
> ___
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


sys/sys/param.h: 'main' instead of 'Master'?

2021-04-16 Thread Rainer Hurling
While viewing sys/sys/param.h I noticed that the comment of the
definition of __FreeBSD_version is probably out of date.

Since the switch to Git, doesn't it have to be 'main' instead of 'master'?

#cd /usr/src
#diff -urN sys/sys/param.h.orig sys/sys/param.h | colordiff
--- sys/sys/param.h.orig2021-04-09 12:59:25.363286000 +0200
+++ sys/sys/param.h 2021-04-16 18:28:46.621429000 +0200
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
  * in the range 5 to 9.
  */
 #undef __FreeBSD_version
-#define __FreeBSD_version 147  /* Master, propagated to newvers */
+#define __FreeBSD_version 147  /* main, propagated to newvers */

 /*
  * __FreeBSD_kernel__ indicates that this system uses the kernel of
FreeBSD,

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


AW: NFS issues since upgrading to 13-RELEASE

2021-04-16 Thread Scheffenegger, Richard
FWIW:

r367492 fixes an issue around "premature" transmission of an ACK due to the 
incoming segment only been partially processed at the time - related to 
in-kernel TCP consumers which use socket upcalls.

Rick mentioned, that the NFS server (one in-kernel TCP user) has stringent 
requirements on the state of the socket during the upcall, thus D29690 is 
retaining the lock on the socket buffer until TCP processing is finalized and 
the upcall can be done without running any risk for transmitting outdated 
information back to the other end.

However, I have no proper way to verify/validate this interaction.

My ask would be to test the behavior with D29690 first - but if similar hangs 
keep reoccurring, then revert r367492 (which will also mean more severe surgery 
on the TCP processing flow).

Thanks.

Richard Scheffenegger

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Rick Macklem  
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. April 2021 23:05
An: Allan Jude ; freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc: Richard Scheffenegger ; Juraj Lutter 
Betreff: Re: NFS issues since upgrading to 13-RELEASE

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




I wrote:
[stuff snipped]
>- Alternately you can try rscheff@'s alternate proposed patch that is 
>at
>  https://reviews.freebsd.og/D29690.
Oops, that's
https:/reviews.freebsd.org/D29690

rick

  I have not yet had time to test this one, but since I cannot reproduce the 
hang, I can
  only do testing of it to see that it is "no worse" than reverting r367492 for 
my
  setup.

Please let us know which you choose and whether or not it fixes your problem.

>> Any pointers for troubleshooting this? I've been looking through vmstat, 
>> gstat, top, etc. when the problem occurs, but I haven't been able to 
>> pinpoint the issue. I can get pcap, but it would be from the hosts, because 
>> I don't have a 10G tap or managed switch.
>>
>
>run `nfsstat -d 1` and try to capture a few lines from before, during, 
>and after the stall, and that may provide some insight.
>
>Specifically, does the queue length grow, suggesting it is waiting on 
>the I/O subsystem, or does it just stop getting traffic all together.

If the revert of r367492 does not fix the problem, monitor the TCP 
connection(s) via "netstat -a" and, if possible, capture packets via tcpdump -s 
0 -w hang.pcap host  or similar, run on the server.

Ideally the tcpdump would  be started before the "hang" occurs, but running one 
while the hang is occurring (until after it recovers) could also be useful.

Thanks for reporting this, rick

--
Allan Jude
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list 
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Cross-compiling CURRENT to Raspberry 4

2021-04-16 Thread Alexis Praga
Hi,

I've been running 14.0-CURRENT with the default raspberry image
(main-n245255-483c6da3a20) on my Raspberry 4.

I would like to follow CURRENT but there is not enough space with just
the SD card to compile on the pi.

I tried to compile the kernel, using the same git version but without
debug on my other computer (amd64, running 13.0-RELEASE) and install it
with SSHFS. But the new kernel failed to boot with an error 19. Here is how I
compiled the kernel  :

> git clone -o freebsd -b main https://git.freebsd.org/src.git src
> git checkout -b 483c6da3a20
> mkdir obj
> setenv MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX ~/softwares/raspberry-update/obj/
> time make -j 4 TARGET=arm64 TARGET_ARCH=aarch64 buildkernel 
> KERNCONF=GENERIC-NODEBUG

> sshfs -o idmap=user root@raspberry:/ /raspberry
> make TARGET_ARCH=aarch64 DESTDIR=/raspberry/ KERNCONF=GENERIC-NODEBUG  
> installkernel

Any ideas ?
Thanks !
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Trying to build Current

2021-04-16 Thread Willem Jan Withagen via freebsd-current

On 15-4-2021 14:20, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:51:39 +0200
Willem Jan Withagen via freebsd-current 
wrote:


Hi,

I actually went completely back to the basic setup with directories
/usr/src and /usr/obj
But even then I do not manage to buildworld.
The process keeps bumping into missing bsm/audit.

First case was when it tried to build the 64bit libc.
I copied the bsm directory into
      /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/include/sys/

Which allowed it to continue.
But then a bit further on it halts again in 32bit libc.
Whcih I could fix the same way.

--- fts.o ---
In file included from /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/fts.c:40:
In file included from
/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/obj-lib32/tmp/usr/include/sys/mount.h:38:
/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/obj-lib32/tmp/usr/include/sys/ucred.h:42:10:
fatal error: 'bsm/audit.h' file not found
#include 
   ^

Even defining HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD did not help, but then I'm not doing
'make world'

So why is this include file missing?



  Try with
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=f41efc453ab5563cde214cb19273d87e6e4aa2d4
applied.
  You probably have WITHOUT_AUDIT=yes in src.conf


That seems to do the trick.

Thanx,
--WjW


___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"