Re: hd numbering in 9.0beta1

2011-08-29 Thread Edho P Arief
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Roger Genre genre.ro...@orange.fr wrote:
 But adding a new hard disk will shift one, more, or all the previous
 numbers, (depênding from the channel the new disk is attached to), making
 the /etc/fstab files irrelevant, and leading kernel in panic at boot-up.


there's a good reason we have geom_label now.

My fstab now looks like this:

/dev/ufs/root3 / ufs rw,noatime 1 1
/dev/label/swap3 none swap sw 0 0
proc /proc procfs rw 0 0

-- 
O ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Hardware RAID and FreeBSD.

2011-04-28 Thread Edho P Arief
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Colin Mitchell
c...@colinrmitchell.endoftheinternet.org wrote:
 Anyways, I bought a new lower-end computer that I was hoping to replace
 both with.  It is a dirt-cheap dual-core AMD that I had built for
 $175US.  It came with a 500GB HDD, and I would like to get another one
 to put in it.  Now, I would like to set up as a mirrored RAID setup (I
 think). I don't really know much about RAID, but I want to have the same
 disk image on both hard drives (in case one fails), and possibly three
 if I buy another HDD in the future.  Is RAID 1 what I want?  I also want
 to do SVN on it for my PhD code, as well as back up my Wordpress,
 Coppermine, etc...

 Now, here is where the FreeBSD gurus can chime in.  I would like to get
 a hardware RAID card to tie it all together.  I am also looking for a
 cheap one, maybe $30-$60US, if this is even feasible.  Anyone have any
 suggestions?  Any successes?


As I'm in softraid camp, I suggest saving yourself from buying a raid
card (especially the cheap ones) and use gmirror instead.

 Also, I see a lot of talk on here bout ZFS.  Is this something I should
 try, instead of the standard UFS?


Only if you have lots of ram (4 GiB or more). Possible with less ram
but I believe it's not recommended.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: partition types 'freebsd-boot' and (g/ufs)labels

2010-10-12 Thread Edho P Arief
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:

 as you can see ada0p1 has a proper glabel in place, still in addition to that
 'glabel status' shows its gptid. is this really necessary?


I believe the gptid will only vanish if the partition in question is
being used (mounted, part of geom or part of zpool)

-- 
O ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Apparent regression in extended/logical partition handling

2010-08-26 Thread Edho P Arief
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
 Specifically what I did was to boot Windows XP, delete all the partitions
 other than the XP partition (first primary dos-style partition) and then
 create a dos-style extended partition, and a logical drive inside of it,
 leaving room for linux in that same extended partition. Since I want that
 data volume to be fat32, and it is too large for windows to do it, I next
 installed FreeBSD 9-current, in a dos-style primary partition. I got it
 installed fine, but when I booted into FreeBSD 9 to format the logical
 volume it could not see it. fdisk showed the right information about the
 extended partition, but in /dev instead of seeing no ad0s2 and seeing ad0s5
 like I expected instead there was no ad0s5 and there were ad0s2 entries that
 mirrored the ad0s3 that FreeBSD 9 was installed on. IOW, I had ad0s3 and
 ad0s3[a-f] as expected, but I had the same for ad0s2 even though they were
 obviously not valid.

how does it look like in

# gpart show

?


 One side note, I was taught back in the day that dos-style extended
 partitions always had to be at the end of the disk. Before trying the
 configuration I have I searched quite a few places to find a reference to
 that rule and couldn't find one. Perhaps this is something that's actually
 improved in the PC world in the last 25 years? :)

after 25 years, x86 world finally started adapting GPT :)


-- 
O ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org