Re: **HEADS UP** if you used to cvsup the crypto repo from internat !

2000-07-13 Thread Martin Hopkins

 "Warner" == Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Warner In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Polstra writes:
Warner :  This is probably a candidate for UPDATING.
Warner : 
Warner : That wouldn't hurt.  But it actually affects _all_ branches, I
Warner : believe.  So in a way, UPDATING doesn't cover enough ground.

Warner Does anybody have any text that is better than the following?
Warner 2711:
Warner If you used to get your crypto files from internat, AND you
Warner used cvsup to get cvs' ,v files, then the latest changes
Warner to the source collections will impact you.  You will need to
Warner remove all the crypto files and start over.

My understanding was that the problem was cvsuping the crypto ,v
files from internat and then using cvs to get a source tree, i.e I was
under the impression that cvsup in checkout mode was ok.

Martin



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: **HEADS UP** if you used to cvsup the crypto repo from internat !

2000-07-13 Thread Martin Hopkins


Warner In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Martin 
Hopkins writes:
Warner :  "Warner" == Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Warner : 
Warner : Warner In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John 
Polstra writes:
Warner : Warner :  This is probably a candidate for UPDATING.
Warner : Warner : 
Warner : Warner : That wouldn't hurt.  But it actually affects _all_ 
branches, I
Warner : Warner : believe.  So in a way, UPDATING doesn't cover enough 
ground.
Warner : 
Warner : Warner Does anybody have any text that is better than the following?
Warner : Warner 2711:
Warner : Warner   If you used to get your crypto files from internat, 
AND you
Warner : Warner   used cvsup to get cvs' ,v files, then the latest 
changes
Warner : Warner   to the source collections will impact you.  You will 
need to
Warner : Warner   remove all the crypto files and start over.
Warner : 
Warner : My understanding was that the problem was cvsuping the crypto ,v
Warner : files from internat and then using cvs to get a source tree, i.e I was
Warner : under the impression that cvsup in checkout mode was ok.

Warner Do you have a suggested better text?  I thought I said that.

How about...

If you used to mirror the crypto portion of the repository from
internat AND used cvs to check out crypto sources from your local
repository then the recent changes to the source collections will
impact you.  You will need to remove all your crypto sources (e.g
cvs release -d crypto) and start over.

Comments Brian?

Martin



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: **HEADS UP** if you used to cvsup the crypto repo from internat !

2000-07-13 Thread Martin Hopkins

 "Mark" == Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Polstra writes:
 :  This is probably a candidate for UPDATING.
 : 
 : That wouldn't hurt.  But it actually affects _all_ branches, I
 : believe.  So in a way, UPDATING doesn't cover enough ground.
 
 Does anybody have any text that is better than the following?
 2711:
 If you used to get your crypto files from internat, AND you
 used cvsup to get cvs' ,v files, then the latest changes
 to the source collections will impact you.  You will need to
 remove all the crypto files and start over.

Mark Maybe add the directories it will impact; crc/crypto, src/sys/crypto, 
src/eBones, src/secure.

Agreed.  Reading this I just realised I missed the src-sys-crypto
collection in my proposed text.

Martin



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: trigraph in IPV6?

1999-11-30 Thread Martin Hopkins

 "David" == David Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 23:02:21 +0900

 ../../netinet6/in6.c: warning: 1 trigraph(s) encountered
 haven't seen one of  THOSE for a while

 Could you tell me which line was that?  I don't see any...

David Indeed.  The only line I see (as of the 1.1 version of the file, dated
David 1999/11/22 02:44:59) that has 2 consecutive '?' characters at all (which
David sequence introduces all trigraphs) is line 892, which reads

David  *   SIOCGLIFADDR: get first address. (???)

David And my copy of the May 13, 1988 DpANS C states (section 2.2.1.1):

David  2.2.1.1 Trigraph sequences

David  All occurrences in a source file of the following sequences of
David  three characters (called trigraph sequences(5)) are replaced
David  with the corresponding single charcacter.

David  ??= #
David  ??( [
David  ??/ \
David  ??) ]
David  ??' ^
David  ?? {
David  ??! |
David  ?? }
David  ??- ~

David  No other trigraph sequences exist.  Each ? that does not begin
David  one of the trigraphs listed above is not changed.  [Example
David   footnote elided -- dhw]


David KR, 2nd ed., p. 229 appears to agree with the above.

David I suspect a bogus warning from gcc's lexical analyzer.

Why is the ??) not a trigraph? ie. (???) = (?]

Martin

-- 
Martin Hopkins  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Insignia Solutions Plc, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Mercury Centre, Wycombe Lane| Tel: (+44) 1628 539537
Wooburn Green, Bucks, HP10 0HH, UK. | Fax: (+44) 1628 539501


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message