Status of SCHED_ULE?

2003-09-27 Thread Roderick van Domburg
Hello everyone,

I was wondering about the status of the ULE scheduler. Is it very
experimental still or is it reasonably suitable for everyday (i.e.
non-mission-critical) use?

Regards,

Roderick

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Benchmarking KSE and SMPng

2003-09-08 Thread Roderick van Domburg
Hello everyone,

I've got a big bad quad Pentium III Xeon sitting here that needs
reinstalling, and I would like to take the time to do some KSE and SMPng
benchmarking. Question is how to go about doing it.

I reckon I should basically go for four test setups:
1. FreeBSD 4-STABLE
2. FreeBSD 5-STABLE, libc_r
3. FreeBSD 5-STABLE, all libkse enabled
4. FreeBSD 5-STABLE, all libthr enabled

Question is then which {application,theoretical} benchmarks to run under
which circumstances. Although I've heard of bonnie et al, I'm new to the
benchmarking business and welcome any suggestions.

TIA,

Roderick

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Benchmarking KSE and SMPng

2003-09-08 Thread Roderick van Domburg
 Just in case you don't know, there is no 5-STABLE yet. All the 5.x
Releases have
 been based on -CURRENT.

Indeed, I stand corrected.

  Question is then which {application,theoretical} benchmarks to run under
  which circumstances. Although I've heard of bonnie et al, I'm new to the
  benchmarking business and welcome any suggestions.
 
 Something that might be interesting to try is running mysql with libc_r,
 linuxthreads, libkse, and libthr, using the included mysql benchmarks that
come
 with mysql. I used those benchmarks to test mysql on a few of the machines
I
 needed to install it on at one point, and I know mysql utilizes threads.
Off
 the top of my head I can't think of anything other than databases that
 performed badly on FreeBSD before due to threading issues.

How about Apache2 or locked subsystems (I/O and networking spring to mind)?

Regards,

Roderick

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP! ATAng committed

2003-08-24 Thread Roderick van Domburg
 ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this
 update as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
Coolness. Judging from the CVS log, it also gets ATA out under Giant? 
That should make ATA-run SMP boxes eligible for an impressive increase 
in I/O performance... has anyone noticed?

Regards,

Roderick

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


DEVICE_POLLING not in NOTES?

2003-07-15 Thread Roderick van Domburg
Is there any particular reason DEVICE_POLLING is no longer available in NOTES? 
(Or should I say isn't linted any more? :-) It still appears to be available in 
fxp et al.

Regards,

Roderick

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Support DHCP in rc.firewall by default?

2003-06-13 Thread Roderick van Domburg
Right now, rc.firewall isn't set up to support DHCP configurations although
it could easily be done so. Googling comes up with many references, for
example http://www.freebsddiary.org/firewall.php (section ipfw with DHCP
etc at the bottom of the page).

Are there any reasons against having rc.firewall contain such lines? I
reckon it would even come in handy for statically configured users: they'd
only need to specify their network interface(s) once.

Roderick

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 5.0 RC3 now available

2003-01-13 Thread Roderick van Domburg
I would like to point to a currently unresolved issue that Thomas Moestl is
helping me solve on freebsd-sparc@. It isn't listed on the Open Issues page,
but I'd say it's something that needs to be resolved before the release is
rolled.

The thread is titled panic: trap: fast data access mmu miss and is about
an error causing the sym SCSI controller to fail to mount root at best, and
panic at worst.

The sym controller is listed as supported hardware, and used in several Sun
boxes, so IMHO I'd say it warrants the attention.

Regards,

Roderick



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



panic: trap: fast data access mmu miss

2003-01-11 Thread Roderick van Domburg
Running on a Sun Enterprise 250 with a single UltraSparc-II CPU, 512 MB RAM
and three Fujitsu SCSI-II hard disks. I've had this same problem with
sources over the past few (three?) days. I had to copy this dmesg by hand,
so please bear with any possible typos.

--8--

picb1: PCI-PCI bridge at device 2.0 on pci0
pci1: PCI bus on pcib1
isp0: Qlogic ISP 1020/1040 PCI SCSI Adapter port 0x1000-0x10ff mem
0x4008000-0x4008fff irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci1
isp0: invalid NVRAM header
sym0: 875 port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0x410a000-0x410afff,0x4108000-0x41080ff
irq 32 at device 3.0 on pci0
sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking
sym1: 875 port 0x2400-0x24ff mem 0x410e000-0x410efff,0x410c000-0x410c0ff
irq 38 at device 3.1 on pci0
panic: trap: fast data access mmu miss
cpuid = 0;
Debugger(panic)
Stopped at  Debugger+0x1c:  ta  %xcc, 1
db trace
panic() at panic+0x134
trap() at trap+0x414
-- fast data access mmu miss tar=0 %o7=0xc0248c00 --
getbaddrcb() at getbaddrcb
psycho_dmamap_load() at psycho_dmamap_load+0x30
___dma_getp() at ___dma_getp+0xb8
___sym_malloc() at ___sym_malloc+0x70
__sym_calloc2() at __sym_calloc2+0xc
__sym_calloc_dma() at __sym_calloc_dma+0x64
sym_pci_attach() at sym_pci_attach+0x38
device_probe_and_attach at device_probe_and_attach+0xb8
bus_generic_attach() at bus_generic_attach+0x10
pci_attach() at pci_attach+0x9c
device_probe_and_attach at device_probe_and_attach+0xb8
bus_generic_attach() at bus_generic_attach+0x10
psycho_attach() at psycho_attach+0x9d8
device_probe_and_attach at device_probe_and_attach+0xb8
bus_generic_attach() at bus_generic_attach+0x10
device_probe_and_attach at device_probe_and_attach+0xb8
root_bus_configure() at root_bus_configure+0x18
configure() at configure+0x20
mi_startup() at mi_startup+0x12c
btext() at btext+0x30
db



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



buildworld failure

2002-12-31 Thread Roderick van Domburg
Sources updated Dec 31 from anoncvs.freebsd.org on a sparc64. Didn't matter
whether I used cvs update with -P or without -P. Got the following error
during cleaning:

=== usr.sbin/fwcontrol
cd: can't cd to /usr/src/usr.sbin/fwcontrol
*** Error code 2

Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
#



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



RE: buildworld failure

2002-12-31 Thread Roderick van Domburg
   Sources updated Dec 31 from anoncvs.freebsd.org on a sparc64.
   Didn't matter whether I used cvs update with -P or without -P.
 
  Try cvs co -P.

 No, -Pd.

A simple -P seemed to work, thanks! I'm kind of new to this CVS stuff. Hope
you will succeed in Modula-3 ported to sparc64 soon.

Perhaps it would be a good idea to add a how to fetch or update the source
over anoncvs section to the handbook.

The one that there's now doesn't mention the commands necessary to do so
successfully, and for me this has been the second time I've run into such
pruning problems.

Roderick



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



ep0 hard lockup during install

2002-12-30 Thread Roderick van Domburg
Hello,

For three days in a row now I have tried installing the most recent 5.0 
snapshots on my Armada V300 from floppies. I have also tried the RC2 floppies. 

Unfortunately, the system freezes up solid when it configures ep0. I have a 
DHCP server here but manually entering the IP configuration results in the same 
hard lockup. No error messages of any kind are given, I can't switch to pty2 
and the kernel doesn't panic. It just locks up completely and indefinitely.

ep0 is a PCMCIA card. I have two of such cards, one being a 3C589, the other a 
3CXE589DC. Both cards produce the same result but worked fine on 4-STABLE.

I have tried reinserting the cards both before and during the network 
configuration and have also fiddled with the USB legacy support setting in the 
system BIOS (not too much options to fiddle with unfortunately), but to no 
avail. The kernel messages on pty1 and debug messages on pty2 show no deviating 
messages.

Hope you can help!

Roderick

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message