Re: Panic: @r323525: iflib

2017-09-14 Thread Stephen Hurd

John Baldwin wrote:

igb0:  port 0xe020-0xe03f mem 
0xfb22-0xfb23,0xfb244000-0xfb247fff irq 43 at device 0.0 on pci6
igb0: attach_pre capping queues at 8
igb0: using 1024 tx descriptors and 1024 rx descriptors
igb0: msix_init qsets capped at 8
igb0: pxm cpus: 4 queue msgs: 9 admincnt: 1
igb0: trying 4 rx queues 4 tx queues
igb0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors
igb0: allocated for 4 tx_queues
igb0: allocated for 4 rx_queues
taskqgroup_attach_cpu: qid not found for cpu=0
igb0: taskqgroup_attach_cpu failed 22
igb0: Failed to allocate que int 0 err: 22
igb0: IFDI_MSIX_INTR_ASSIGN failed 22
device_attach: igb0 attach returned 22

This is on a quad-core CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3.  It fails both
with SMT enabled or disabled in the BIOS.


Do you have EARLY_AP_STARTUP enabled?

Do you have em in the kernel, or do you load the module?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Several minor annoyances on Current

2014-07-25 Thread Stephen Hurd
Beeblebrox wrote:
 Hello. Several questions for 11-Current:

 * I keep getting appname.core (gedit.core, midori.core, etc) files being
 created either in /home/myuser or in the folder I run the command in on
 terminal emulator (for example if I'm in ~/mydocs on terminal and run $
 gedit filename, that folder gets a gedit.core file). Any way to stop this?

I use this in /etc/sysctl.conf:
kern.corefile=/tmp/cores/%N.core

(You need to create the directory manually)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?

2014-07-20 Thread Stephen Hurd
krad wrote:
 all of that is true, but you are missing the point. Having two
 versions of pf on the bsd's at the user level, is a bad thing. It
 confuses people, which puts them off. Its a classic case of divide an
 conquer for other platforms. I really like the idea of the openpf
 version, that has been mentioned in this thread. It would be awesome
 if it ended up as a supported linux thing as well, so the world could
 be rid of iptables. However i guess thats just an unrealistic dream

No, the point was that matching OpenBSDs pf syntax for the sake of the
Google results isn't a valid reason to change it.  I'm not saying there
aren't any valid reasons, just that useless search results isn't one of
them.

As for my opinion of the rule format changing, I'm fine with it as long
as it happens on a major version release (ie: 11.0) and is documented. 
If I want to use the old pf, I'll use an old FreeBSD.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?

2014-07-19 Thread Stephen Hurd
krad wrote:
 that is true and I have not problem using man pages, however thats not the
 way most of the world work and search engines arent exactly new either. We
 should be trying to engage more people not less, and part of that is
 reaching out.

One of FreeBSD's historic strengths has been the handbook and generally
good quality documentation.  There is no way that the FreeBSD project
can ensure that all Google results for everyone in the world are FreeBSD
related good documentation, but it can ensure that the documentation
included with FreeBSD is accurate and usable, and it can ensure that the
FreeBSD documentation is available via the internet.

Aside from blindly following whatever generates the most Google results
(an obviously broken solution), what exactly can the FreeBSD project do
to ensure that when someone Googles a problem they will end up with a
correct FreeBSD solution?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org