Re: panic with cdrecord-devel @ Mon Oct 20 21:28:57 EEST 2003
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 11:27, Paulius Bulotas wrote: Hello, Any ideas? Paulius my -curret crashes during writing process... ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: D-Link DWL-520+
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 03:10, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote: Hi there. If you want a very stable Freebsd Access Point, use a PCMCIA card with chipset prism II and freebsd 5.0 release I 've got one working for 6 month with more than 40 customers (never crash!!) if you want to use a PCI card try with a Netgear is prism 2.5 (I testing one these now and looks fine but slower than PCMCIA prism II) . Wow. What a stunning things :) PCMCIA is better than PCI... so i have to get pcmcia-adapter for my PC :) However, I'm planning to use 4-stable or 5-current (there are two boxes I'm running freebsd on). Is it very important to up(down)grade it to 5.0? Is 4-stable too bad fot Host AP? Or what about hardware AP and freebsd? Sorry for a lot of questions, I had never mess with wi-fi before. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: D-Link DWL-520+
On Monday 06 October 2003 05:22, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote: Ok.! Anyway don't use the Dlink 520 as Access Point has a bug, and crash very often. :( No problem if you use it like client :) Hm, sounds wery useful for me, thanks a lot. Building wireless Host AP on freebsd using PCI wi-fi card is exact the one thing I want to do. So would you mind to reccommend good PCI card for building Host AP? I know, it should be wi-based card, but what's the best? Or maybe building host AP with PCI card is a bad idea in mind and it's better to buy hardware AP? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-Link DWL-520+
Hello, Does anybody know about $subj PCI wirelerss card. I read mail-archive and found that this card does not equal dwl-520 which has prism2.5 chipset and works well with wi driver. $subj was not supported few months ago, so what's now? If it's not supported, I'm afraid there's no any 22mbps card supported by freebsd. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-Link DWL-520+
Hello, Does anybody know about $subj PCI wirelerss card. I read mail-archive and found that this card does not equal dwl-520 which has prism2.5 chipset and works well with wi driver. $subj was not supported few months ago, so what's now? If it's not supported, I'm afraid there's no any 22mbps card supported by freebsd. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: D-Link DWL-520+
On Monday 06 October 2003 02:11, Brad Knowles wrote: So far as I know, there are no open-source drivers for any 22mpbs card anywhere. Hm, what does 22 mbps mean? As I know, DWL-520+ is a 802.11b-standart based card and the max speed is 11mbps as mentioned in this standart. Reading card specification I thought that 22 mbps with AirPlus series is a kind of PR or adverticement :-) Or is this a kind of enhanced 802.b standart? Where can I read smth about this? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: D-Link DWL-520+
On Monday 06 October 2003 03:26, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote: That wireless card has Texas Instrument chipset and doesn't work on freebsd, I have got a driver for linux but is very dodgy. I wont recomend you use this wireless card. The only reason to talk about this card is it's name, very similar to DWL-520 which works perfect with freebsd (as mailing lists says). Only one little plus (+) makes everything sucks :-) Tomorrow I'll go to shop for moneyback... ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: yep, umass still broken
On Friday 26 September 2003 09:18, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: ohci_intr() ithread_loop() Anyone have any clued? I'll include my dmesg, of course. Yes, the same bad thing with umass on my sony vaio pcg-v505bx laptop. This is the only reason I have to keep slackware linux within to burn cd's and mount usb-drives on this laptop :) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-pthread is deprecated
hello, as you know, there is no more -pthread gcc flag in -current. but many ports (kde3, for example) still wants it. So what should I do to compile kde3 succesfully? The one way I see now is to s/-pthread/-lc_r/g in Makefiles :-) maybe there is another way? Thank you. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
