Re: nfe0 connection not as reliable; a few questions...
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 19:48:46 -0700 (PDT), "Jeffrey Bouquet"wrote: > Updated current { from Sept last year } to this week... and nfe0 now seems > to require a reboot > daily at least { no access to beyond-the-lan ... } > > Is there maybe some tunable (net.inet... ) related or sysctl { kern.ipc... } > similar, that > could be a cause? New code of ifconfig or the network stack within the last > seven > months or so? Usual fixes of MTU size to set? > > The coincidence of the daily network stack loss with the installkernel/world > r298350 would > at first glance rule out hardware issues... Hadn't seen that type of network > issue before > { I can connect to the gateway, but the modem { comtrend } in bridge mode > seems > to fail. }.I checked some of the n...@freebsd.org list to no avail... > The modem had worked > fine for about two weeks previously... at least. > > Apologies for wasting anyone's time; there are tests I could run with more > machines on the > lan, but though to ask here first. And did not think of those setups until > after I had half-completed > this email... > > Thanks. > > ___ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" Progress [still unsure]. On a hunch I ran a small .sh to ping a site periodically [ not constantly and within terms of its usage of course.] That .sh was set up some years back to keep a wifi connection up [laptop]. On this desktop, which had a network disconnect at under two hours and under 4 hours, within the last twenty-four hours or so, it has now, at least once, had the network reliable for over six hours. I've yet to do two other tests ( outage wholly across the lan and a different driver ) but hoping for this workaround to be feasible... ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
nfe0 connection not as reliable; a few questions...
Updated current { from Sept last year } to this week... and nfe0 now seems to require a reboot daily at least { no access to beyond-the-lan ... } Is there maybe some tunable (net.inet... ) related or sysctl { kern.ipc... } similar, that could be a cause? New code of ifconfig or the network stack within the last seven months or so? Usual fixes of MTU size to set? The coincidence of the daily network stack loss with the installkernel/world r298350 would at first glance rule out hardware issues... Hadn't seen that type of network issue before { I can connect to the gateway, but the modem { comtrend } in bridge mode seems to fail. }.I checked some of the n...@freebsd.org list to no avail... The modem had worked fine for about two weeks previously... at least. Apologies for wasting anyone's time; there are tests I could run with more machines on the lan, but though to ask here first. And did not think of those setups until after I had half-completed this email... Thanks. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: A few questions
On 2002-11-02 00:39, Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 01-Nov-2002 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2002-10-31 18:39, Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And finally, is there a simple way to ensure that none of the debugging code (including INVARIANTS stuff) is included during a buildworld? INVARIANTS and WITNESS are kernel-only stuff. They shouldn't affect your userland programs. If they do, it's probably a bug. I just happened to notice this: $ grep -r 'CFLAGS.*INVARIANTS' /usr/src /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/Makefile.inc:#CFLAGS+= -DWANT_COMPILER_INVARIANTS /usr/src/lib/libc_r/Makefile:CFLAGS+=-D_PTHREADS_INVARIANTS /usr/src/lib/libpthread/Makefile:CFLAGS+=-D_PTHREADS_INVARIANTS Ah, good catch. It seems that _PTHREADS_INVARIANTS is enabled in libc_r and libpthread unconditionally. It's not related to the kernel INVARIANTS option, but looking at the under src/lib/libc_r I can see that it enables a few extra checks and panic()s here and there. Since I've been running with the checks for a while, and never paniced because of libc_r it's probably safe to remove. Giorgos. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: A few questions
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On 2002-10-31 18:39, Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off : very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. : [...] : And finally, is there a simple way to ensure that none of the debugging : code (including INVARIANTS stuff) is included during a buildworld? : : INVARIANTS and WITNESS are kernel-only stuff. They shouldn't affect : your userland programs. If they do, it's probably a bug. Actually, they slow things down a little, which is likely why someone wants to get of them. Just make sure that they aren't in the kernel config file should be sufficient. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: A few questions
On 2002-10-31 18:39, Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. [...] And finally, is there a simple way to ensure that none of the debugging code (including INVARIANTS stuff) is included during a buildworld? INVARIANTS and WITNESS are kernel-only stuff. They shouldn't affect your userland programs. If they do, it's probably a bug. Giorgos. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: A few questions
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 06:39:00PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. It's odd, though, that after upgrading again just a few days later, suddenly X (or perhaps just xdm) failed to start due to an unresolved symbol. I had already upgraded X, as well as many other ports, after upgrading to -current, btw. What symbol? It seems very peculiar that a cvsup just a few days apart from the previous one would require X to be rebuilt. What dates? Kris msg45868/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: A few questions
On 01-Nov-2002 Conrad Sabatier wrote: I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. It's odd, though, that after upgrading again just a few days later, suddenly X (or perhaps just xdm) failed to start due to an unresolved symbol. I had already upgraded X, as well as many other ports, after upgrading to -current, btw. It seems very peculiar that a cvsup just a few days apart from the previous one would require X to be rebuilt. OK, turned out it was a mismatched gtk/glib combination. On another note, can someone clue me in as to why I'm getting all these duplicate script errors when building both ports and world? I've looked high and low and can't find the reason for this. Seems harmless enough, but it *is* just slightly annoying. And these seem to have pretty much disappeared as well. Still no idea what was causing them. And finally, is there a simple way to ensure that none of the debugging code (including INVARIANTS stuff) is included during a buildworld? It would be nice if there were a simple switch or environment variable to control this. Now *this* I would still be interested to know about. -- Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Liar, n.: A lawyer with a roving commission. -- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: A few questions
On 01-Nov-2002 Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 06:39:00PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. It's odd, though, that after upgrading again just a few days later, suddenly X (or perhaps just xdm) failed to start due to an unresolved symbol. I had already upgraded X, as well as many other ports, after upgrading to -current, btw. What symbol? The symbol was __sF, if I remember correctly. Turned out to be ports-related (out of sync port upgrades). It seems very peculiar that a cvsup just a few days apart from the previous one would require X to be rebuilt. What dates? OK, OK, I know. I could have provided more details. :-) Sorry for the noise. -- Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] At least they're __EXPERIENCED incompetents To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: A few questions
On 01-Nov-2002 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2002-10-31 18:39, Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] And finally, is there a simple way to ensure that none of the debugging code (including INVARIANTS stuff) is included during a buildworld? INVARIANTS and WITNESS are kernel-only stuff. They shouldn't affect your userland programs. If they do, it's probably a bug. I just happened to notice this: $ grep -r 'CFLAGS.*INVARIANTS' /usr/src /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/Makefile.inc:#CFLAGS+= -DWANT_COMPILER_INVARIANTS /usr/src/lib/libc_r/Makefile:CFLAGS+=-D_PTHREADS_INVARIANTS /usr/src/lib/libpthread/Makefile:CFLAGS+=-D_PTHREADS_INVARIANTS Granted, the first one is commented out (and I've already built world after commenting the other two with no ill effects). -- Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] He played the king as if afraid someone else would play the ace. -- John Mason Brown, drama critic To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
A few questions
I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. It's odd, though, that after upgrading again just a few days later, suddenly X (or perhaps just xdm) failed to start due to an unresolved symbol. I had already upgraded X, as well as many other ports, after upgrading to -current, btw. It seems very peculiar that a cvsup just a few days apart from the previous one would require X to be rebuilt. On another note, can someone clue me in as to why I'm getting all these duplicate script errors when building both ports and world? I've looked high and low and can't find the reason for this. Seems harmless enough, but it *is* just slightly annoying. And finally, is there a simple way to ensure that none of the debugging code (including INVARIANTS stuff) is included during a buildworld? It would be nice if there were a simple switch or environment variable to control this. Please forgive if this is all old stuff; I'm new with -current, and I have made a real effort to find the answers to this stuff myself. Thanks. -- Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] One Page Principle: A specification that will not fit on one page of 8.5x11 inch paper cannot be understood. -- Mark Ardis To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message