A full clean build resolved the problem. It was likely some incompatible CTF or possibly some other patch that touched DTrace that left my obj tree in an inconsistent state.
-- Cheers, Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <c...@freebsd.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: <c...@nwtime.org> Web: https://nwtime.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. In message <20220318234704.6c14...@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert writes: > It's been a while (~ 4-6 months) since I've last used dtrace. Needing to > use it again today scripts that worked before fail to. > > A first example: > > cwfw# cat dt10.d > #!/usr/sbin/dtrace -s > > fbt::ipf_check:entry { > parintf("%x\n", (void) arg[1]); > } > > cwfw# > > Results in this error: > > cwfw# ./dt10.d > dtrace: failed to compile script ./dt10.d: "/usr/lib/dtrace/psinfo.d", line > 1: cannot translate from "struct thread *" to "lwpsinfo_t *" > cwfw# > > Another example, > > slippy# cat dtrace.d > #!/usr/sbin/dtrace -s > > fbt::uma_reclaim:entry { > printf("in uma_reclaim\n"); > } > slippy# > > Results in the same error: > > slippy# ./dtrace.d > dtrace: failed to compile script ./dtrace.d: "/usr/lib/dtrace/psinfo.d", > line 1: cannot translate from "struct thread *" to "lwpsinfo_t *" > slippy# > > > A variation of the second example, > > slippy# cat dtrace.sh > #!/bin/sh - > dtrace -n 'fbt::uma_reclaim:entry { printf("in uma_reclaim\n"); }' > slippy# > > Results in two errors, the first being that the -n option results in an > invalid probe specified and the second being the struct thread * error. > > slippy# ./dtrace.sh > dtrace: invalid probe specifier fbt::uma_reclaim:entry { printf("in > uma_reclaim\n"); }: "/usr/lib/dtrace/psinfo.d", line 1: cannot translate > from "struct thread *" to "lwpsinfo_t *" > slippy# > > I'm not sure if this is related to 2d5d2a986ce or something else. > > > -- > Cheers, > Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> > FreeBSD UNIX: <c...@freebsd.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org > NTP: <c...@nwtime.org> Web: https://nwtime.org > > The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. > > >
