Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?
> Hmmm, that's odd, because the patch Marcel sent me was later committed > to signal.h as rev 1.22 -- and it did indeed fix the Xfree86 3.3.5 > ``make install'' problem for me. H.. root@test-> ident /usr/include/sys/signal.h /usr/include/sys/signal.h: $FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/signal.h,v 1.22 1999/10/16 12:18:10 marcel Exp $ Ummm. Now I can't reproduce it, and I'd swear this was the same file as before! Erm. Maybe it's just too damn late. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?
> Hmmm, that's odd, because the patch Marcel sent me was later committed > to signal.h as rev 1.22 Thanks. I did falsely check the log for src/include/signal.h instead of the one in src/sys/sys > and it did indeed fix the Xfree86 3.3.5 ``make install'' problem for me. That's what I understood from your post and someone else's post (Amancio?). I myself have some important stuff to finish, and can't risk X not working, so I will not test this fix out before. Regards, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?
On 18 Oct, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >> See the mails from October 15th, esp. the ones from Marcel Moolenaar >> and Sheldon Hearn. > > I did, but they don't fix the XFree86 3.3.5 build problem. I build 3.3.5 at Oct 16th (~8pm CET, cvsup & world ~3pm?), no 3rd-party patches applied. Bye, Alexander. -- http://netchild.home.pages.de A.Leidinger @ WJPServer.CS.Uni-SB.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 01:52:57 MST, "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > See the mails from October 15th, esp. the ones from Marcel Moolenaar > > and Sheldon Hearn. > > I did, but they don't fix the XFree86 3.3.5 build problem. Hmmm, that's odd, because the patch Marcel sent me was later committed to signal.h as rev 1.22 -- and it did indeed fix the Xfree86 3.3.5 ``make install'' problem for me. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?
> See the mails from October 15th, esp. the ones from Marcel Moolenaar > and Sheldon Hearn. I did, but they don't fix the XFree86 3.3.5 build problem. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?
> I've got a box running yesterday's -current and it can't compile > or install things like XFree86 or ImageMagik due to syntax errors > in this file. See the mails from October 15th, esp. the ones from Marcel Moolenaar and Sheldon Hearn. It seems this patch has not been commited yet. Anyone got problems? Regards, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?
In <19538.940215318@localhost>, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I've got a box running yesterday's -current and it can't compile
[...]
>#if defined(_P1003_1B_VISIBLE) || defined(KERNEL)
>..
>#endif
I use the appended C file and compilation shell script to test include
file changes. I recommend it to everyone working on headers.
Martin
--
%
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536
#! /bin/sh
set -e
set -x
cc -D_ANSI_SOURCE -Wall -Werror -o/dev/null test1.c
cc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -Wall -Werror -o/dev/null test1.c
cc -Wall -Werror -o/dev/null test1.c
#include
int main(void)
{
return 0;
}
Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?
I've got a box running yesterday's -current and it can't compile or install things like XFree86 or ImageMagik due to syntax errors in this file. Investigating further, I find that the trouble begins around line 127, where we see: #if defined(_P1003_1B_VISIBLE) || defined(KERNEL) .. #endif around some declarations for sigval and siginfo_t. The problem is that these typedefs are later used to define other structures like sigevent sig_t but *without* the aformentioned #if clause so they essentially get referenced without being defined. I also find it hard to believe that I'm the first to run into this since the signal changes went in. Has no one else experienced this? Oh, and yes, I made sure I was working with the very latest sources and I rebuilt everything in sight before raising this complaint. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
