Re: Is netstat b?rked?
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:07:50PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote: ref5% netstat -na -p tcp ref5% dalek# netstat -an -p tcp dalek# Both beast and ref5 are from Jan 4 and exhibit this problem; builder, which is from Jan 28, doesn't. Perhaps, someone updated the kernel and forgot to update the userland, or vice versa? Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunbay Software AG, [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age msg51259/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Is netstat b?rked?
* De: Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-30 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Is netstat b?rked? ] On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:07:50PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote: ref5% netstat -na -p tcp ref5% dalek# netstat -an -p tcp dalek# Both beast and ref5 are from Jan 4 and exhibit this problem; builder, which is from Jan 28, doesn't. Perhaps, someone updated the kernel and forgot to update the userland, or vice versa? No, a modern kernel fixes it. Apparently the kernel was really broken since I first started seeing this (which means that it is in 5.0-R too). Kernel build took as long as it did for your reply :) I kinda doubted it was that, since my kernel was only 6 days old. Thanx, juli. -- Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: BSDFlata -- IRC: juli on EFnet OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: Is netstat b?rked?
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:30:44AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-30 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Is netstat b?rked? ] On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:07:50PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote: ref5% netstat -na -p tcp ref5% dalek# netstat -an -p tcp dalek# Both beast and ref5 are from Jan 4 and exhibit this problem; builder, which is from Jan 28, doesn't. Perhaps, someone updated the kernel and forgot to update the userland, or vice versa? No, a modern kernel fixes it. Apparently the kernel was really broken since I first started seeing this (which means that it is in 5.0-R too). Kernel build took as long as it did for your reply :) I kinda doubted it was that, since my kernel was only 6 days old. I'm running 5.0-RELEASE here and 'netstat -na -p tcp' works as expected. -Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: Is netstat b?rked?
* De: Scott R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-30 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Is netstat b?rked? ] On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:30:44AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-30 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Is netstat b?rked? ] On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:07:50PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote: ref5% netstat -na -p tcp ref5% dalek# netstat -an -p tcp dalek# Both beast and ref5 are from Jan 4 and exhibit this problem; builder, which is from Jan 28, doesn't. Perhaps, someone updated the kernel and forgot to update the userland, or vice versa? No, a modern kernel fixes it. Apparently the kernel was really broken since I first started seeing this (which means that it is in 5.0-R too). Kernel build took as long as it did for your reply :) I kinda doubted it was that, since my kernel was only 6 days old. I'm running 5.0-RELEASE here and 'netstat -na -p tcp' works as expected. Hmm, OK. Thanks :) -- Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: BSDFlata -- IRC: juli on EFnet OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
