Re: Chrooted telnet support in 4.x???
In message 051001bf942c$87e3fa40$[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Alejandro Ramirez" writes: Hi, Will FreeBSD 4.x will be able to chroot telnet sessions natively???, or are there any plans to integrate this patches to the base system: Investigate the jail(8) facility in 4.x, it is *far* stronger than anything chroot(2) has to offer. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
RE: Chrooted telnet support in 4.x???
Thanks a lot for clarifying my mind, I will take a look at this. Greetings... Ales - Original Message - From: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alejandro Ramirez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 12:40 PM Subject: Re: Chrooted telnet support in 4.x??? In message 051001bf942c$87e3fa40$[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Alejandro Ramirez" writes: Hi, Will FreeBSD 4.x will be able to chroot telnet sessions natively???, or are there any plans to integrate this patches to the base system: Investigate the jail(8) facility in 4.x, it is *far* stronger than anything chroot(2) has to offer. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: Chrooted telnet support in 4.x???
what would be even cooler is if we could jail() a user natively at login. I bet this patch could be easily modified to use jail() instead of chroot(). On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message 051001bf942c$87e3fa40$[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Alejandro Ramirez" writes: Hi, Will FreeBSD 4.x will be able to chroot telnet sessions natively???, or are there any plans to integrate this patches to the base system: Investigate the jail(8) facility in 4.x, it is *far* stronger than anything chroot(2) has to offer. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: Chrooted telnet support in 4.x???
You could do that, rather easily. In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Mr. K." writes : what would be even cooler is if we could jail() a user natively at login. I bet this patch could be easily modified to use jail() instead of chroot(). On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message 051001bf942c$87e3fa40$[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Alejandro Ramirez" writes: Hi, Will FreeBSD 4.x will be able to chroot telnet sessions natively???, or are there any plans to integrate this patches to the base system: Investigate the jail(8) facility in 4.x, it is *far* stronger than anything chroot(2) has to offer. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
