Re: midi problem, an isa device on a pci card

2003-04-06 Thread Mathew Kanner
Hello,
I've recived no responses.  Anyway, the following includes my
own solution to the question, lots of trial and error.  I've found that
isahints was the closest exsting code to what I wanted. 
As always, I would love to hear any comments.

   How do I create isa devices from a pci device.  Do I search up the
 soundcard tree for the pci bus then search down for the isa bus, then
 create_child(...mpushim)?

In pci device_attach:
isa=devclass_find(isa);
if( !isa ) {
device_printf(sc-dev,cmi midi error no devclass for isa\n);
goto err;
}
if (devclass_get_devices(isa, isalistp, isacountp) != 0 ) {
device_printf(sc-dev,cmi midi error fetching isa devices\n);
goto err;
}
if ( isacountp  1 ) {
device_printf(sc-dev,cmi midi no isa busses found\n);
goto err;
}
/*
 *  Be stupid and just pick the first isa bus
 */
sc-isadev = isalistp[0];
mpuisa=devclass_find(mpuisa);
if( !mpuisa ) {
device_printf(sc-dev,cmi: midi driver not found\n);
goto err;
}
i = devclass_find_free_unit(mpuisa,0);
sc-mpudev = BUS_ADD_CHILD(sc-isadev, 1, mpuisa, i);

[Needs to be done with BUS_ADD_CHILD, I tried with others, m' yo
they just don't work]

   How do I tell the shim before the probe/attach what io region to look
 at, do I fiddle with ivars (or some internal structure),  do I mess with hints
 via kenv(9) [Is there a kenv(9)? ]

[ Say, p-port=0x300, then following would set it to 0x300-0x302 
  and the same IRQ as the pci device ]

bus_set_resource(sc-mpudev, SYS_RES_IOPORT, 0, p-port, 2);
bus_set_resource(sc-mpudev, SYS_RES_IRQ, 0, rman_get_start(sc-irq), 1);
if( device_probe_and_attach(sc-mpudev) == 0 ) {
device_printf(sc-dev,added %s/%s\n, 
device_get_nameunit(sc-isadev), 
device_get_nameunit(sc-mpudev) );
   return ;
}


Cheers,
--Mat
-- 
Brain: Are you pondering what I'm pondering?
Pinky: I think so Brain, but the Rockettes, it's mostly girls, isn't it?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MIDI

2003-04-02 Thread Peter Schultz
David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Thanjee Neefam [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

I was very happy when compiling my 5.0 kernel. For the first time device
midi compiled without giving any errors. This abnormal excitement only
led to misery when I discovered after rebooting that there still was no
MIDI. 
Is MIDI going to be implemented soon? Who is working on it? Can I help
them? (I am not a very good programmer, but I can hack pre existing code,
and I am good at testing). MIDI is the ONLY thing stopping me from
running FreeBSD exclusively.


FYI, the non-free OSS driver supports MIDI:

	http://www.opensound.com/bsd.html
Apparently even this is not complete, however:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1250661+0+archive/2003/freebsd-current/20030323.freebsd-current
One interesting thing to note from that thread, is that Yuriy Tsibizov 
is into the development of this stuff, but does not have all the 
equipment needed to conduct testing.  I don't know what hardware you 
have, but this is what he's been working on:
http://chibis.persons.gfk.ru/audigy/

Pete...

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: MIDI

2003-04-02 Thread Yuriy Tsibizov
 From: Peter Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
One interesting thing to note from that thread, is that Yuriy Tsibizov 
is into the development of this stuff, but does not have all the 
equipment needed to conduct testing.  I don't know what hardware you 
have, but this is what he's been working on:
http://chibis.persons.gfk.ru/audigy/


No! I'm not a MIDI subsystem developer! The only thing I do is an attempt to add MIDI 
I/O to Live/Audigy cards. If MIDI subsystem is not compllete I'll stop this work. I'm 
going to do only card-specific drivers, not to fix possible broken in-kernel MIDI.

Yuriy

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MIDI

2003-03-31 Thread Friedemann Becker
I'm interrested in using MIDI on FreeBSD, too, but I have to tell you,
that - as far as I found out - there has been midi support some time
ago, but it's not included in the system/kernel anymore.

There's probably some hope although, I don't find it, but I remember
someone stated that you can easily apply the netbsd midi code as a
patch to the current kernel. 5.0RC2 works according to this source,
but had system reboots, when kldloading the midi module.

If you're interrested, maybee you have more luck searching, there
aren't many articles about freebsd and midi on the net (especially
newer ones).


I'll keep on searching


Friedemann


 Hello,
 I am not sure if this is most appropriate here, but there is no
 sound-dev-current mailing list.

 I was very happy when compiling my 5.0 kernel. For the first time device
 midi compiled without giving any errors. This abnormal excitement only
 led to misery when I discovered after rebooting that there still was no
 MIDI.
 Is MIDI going to be implemented soon? Who is working on it? Can I help
 them? (I am not a very good programmer, but I can hack pre existing code,
 and I am good at testing). MIDI is the ONLY thing stopping me from
 running FreeBSD exclusively.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MIDI

2003-03-31 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Thanjee Neefam [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 I was very happy when compiling my 5.0 kernel. For the first time device
 midi compiled without giving any errors. This abnormal excitement only
 led to misery when I discovered after rebooting that there still was no
 MIDI. 
 Is MIDI going to be implemented soon? Who is working on it? Can I help
 them? (I am not a very good programmer, but I can hack pre existing code,
 and I am good at testing). MIDI is the ONLY thing stopping me from
 running FreeBSD exclusively.

FYI, the non-free OSS driver supports MIDI:

http://www.opensound.com/bsd.html
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: MIDI on SB Live! ?

2003-03-24 Thread Yuriy Tsibizov
 just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for 
 Creative EMU10K1
 based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
Nobody. Our target for nearest future is Audigy/Audigy2 support. 

Yuriy Tsibizov,
http://chibis.persons.gfk.ru/audigy/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


RE: MIDI on SB Live! ?

2003-03-24 Thread Julian St.
Am Mo, 2003-03-24 um 07.47 schrieb Yuriy Tsibizov:
  just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for 
  Creative EMU10K1
  based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
 Nobody. Our target for nearest future is Audigy/Audigy2 support. 
 
 Yuriy Tsibizov,
 http://chibis.persons.gfk.ru/audigy/

Your page says:
0. It works for SB Live! and Audigy. Not for Audigy2. 
and MIDI is on the TODO-list

So, guess there is still some hope for SB Live! MIDI in the not-so-near
 future. :) Or are the differences between an EMU10K2 (as seen in the dmesg,
I guess Audigy?) and EMU10K1 that big?

Regards,
Julian Stecklina


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


RE: MIDI on SB Live! ?

2003-03-24 Thread Yuriy Tsibizov
 From: Julian St. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:26 PM
   just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for 
   Creative EMU10K1
   based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
  Nobody. Our target for nearest future is Audigy/Audigy2 support. 
 
 Your page says:
 0. It works for SB Live! and Audigy. Not for Audigy2. 
 and MIDI is on the TODO-list
Yes, MIDI I/O is in my TODO list, but I'm not working on it now.

 So, guess there is still some hope for SB Live! MIDI in the 
 not-so-near  future. :) 
I can't promise that I start to code MIDI I/O in nearest future 
Mostly because I don't need it. I don't have any MIDI device at home or at work. 

 Or are the differences between an EMU10K2 (as 
 seen in the dmesg,
 I guess Audigy?) and EMU10K1 that big?
EMU10K2=Audigy

MIDI I/O should be almost the same between EMU10Kx cards... But I don't have any MIDI 
devices (other than AudigyDrive remote control, it should act as a MIDI controller on 
second MIDI port, AFAIK) to check it. 

Yuriy


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


RE: MIDI on SB Live! ?

2003-03-24 Thread Julian St.
Am Mo, 2003-03-24 um 14.02 schrieb Yuriy Tsibizov:

 MIDI I/O should be almost the same between EMU10Kx cards... But I don't have any 
 MIDI devices (other than AudigyDrive remote control, it should act as a MIDI 
 controller on second MIDI port, AFAIK) to check it. 

I have several devices to test it on. :) Perhaps until then I have
learned enough (sound) driver hacking that I could adapt (with the help
of some hardware documentation) your EMU10K2 MIDI code to EMU10K1
boards. It is a bit hard to get started though.

Regards,
Julian Stecklina


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Need ALSA [was: Re: MIDI on SB Live! ?]

2003-03-22 Thread Peter Schultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,

just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative EMU10K1
based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
Regards,
Julian Stecklina
Having a port of ALSA would sure round out 5.2 nicely, and would get you 
MIDI support: http://www.alsa-project.org/

This can easily happen if we get behind a developer.  ALSA has been 
sponsored by SuSE for the benefit of Linux, and there's no reason we 
can't pull together our resources to do the same for our OS.  I'm sure 
someone will step forward to do the port if we have the cash for them to 
comfortably sit in front of their computer until the port is complete.

I'd certainly be more than willing to throw some money into a paypal 
account or whatever, and I think there are others who would too.  OSS is 
so 20th century, lets get FreeBSD into 21st century sound architecture 
design.  :-)

If you're a developer seriously interested in this, lets talk.  So much 
of FreeBSD development is sponsored by Universities and whatnot that we 
take it for granted.  When stuff like ALSA doesn't get ported right 
away, I feel we need to realize our responsibility to contribute to the 
project as well.

Sincerely,
Pete...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


RE: Need ALSA [was: Re: MIDI on SB Live! ?]

2003-03-22 Thread der_julian
Hello,

 Having a port of ALSA would sure round out 5.2 nicely, and would get you 
 MIDI support: http://www.alsa-project.org/

Quote from this page:

Known bugs

- MIDI on SB live drive not working properly.

Seems MIDI is not a great priority anymore. But I would certainly greet a
new sound architecture. Broken MIDI is at least better than no MIDI. ;)

[porting] 
 I'd certainly be more than willing to throw some money into a paypal 
 account or whatever, and I think there are others who would too.  OSS is 
 so 20th century, lets get FreeBSD into 21st century sound architecture 
 design.  :-)

I would have no objections.
 
 If you're a developer seriously interested in this, lets talk.  So much 
 of FreeBSD development is sponsored by Universities and whatnot that we 
 take it for granted.  When stuff like ALSA doesn't get ported right 
 away, I feel we need to realize our responsibility to contribute to the 
 project as well.

Uh... Ok, I have C experience, but my insight into FreeBSD and sound card
programming (I remember some experiments with soundblasters in DOS times) is
quite limited.

Regards,
Julian Stecklina 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: Need ALSA [was: Re: MIDI on SB Live! ?]

2003-03-22 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Saturday 22 March 2003 14:52, Peter Schultz wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hello,
 
  just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative
  EMU10K1 based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
 
  Regards,
  Julian Stecklina

 Having a port of ALSA would sure round out 5.2 nicely, and would get you
 MIDI support: http://www.alsa-project.org/

I think you wouldn't really do anyone a favour, including the ALSA folks, if 
you went and made a port right now. The ALSA project is still not at 1.00 
status and still quite in-flux.

 This can easily happen if we get behind a developer.  ALSA has been
 sponsored by SuSE for the benefit of Linux, and there's no reason we
 can't pull together our resources to do the same for our OS.  I'm sure
 someone will step forward to do the port if we have the cash for them to
 comfortably sit in front of their computer until the port is complete.

I'd appreciate sponsoring somebody to work on our existing newpcm stuff and 
add the missing bits and pieces much more. Donating hardware (soundcards and 
MIDI-devices) would probably help very much already.

-- 
Regards,
Michael Nottebrock

pgp0.pgp
Description: signature


Re: MIDI on SB Live! ?

2003-03-22 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Friday 21 March 2003 21:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

 just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative
 EMU10K1 based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?

On and off, as far as I can tell. If you want MIDI right now, take a look at 
what 4Front Technologies offers in their commercial OSS package.

-- 
Regards,
Michael Nottebrock


pgp0.pgp
Description: signature


Re: Need ALSA [was: Re: MIDI on SB Live! ?]

2003-03-22 Thread Peter Schultz
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Saturday 22 March 2003 14:52, Peter Schultz wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello,

just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative
EMU10K1 based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
Regards,
Julian Stecklina
Having a port of ALSA would sure round out 5.2 nicely, and would get you
MIDI support: http://www.alsa-project.org/


I think you wouldn't really do anyone a favour, including the ALSA folks, if 
you went and made a port right now. The ALSA project is still not at 1.00 
status and still quite in-flux.

One could go either way with this.  Leave it for after 1.0, or grab it 
now and help build it up for a better 2.0.  Or I guess we could initiate 
the ABSDSA and have support for both ALSA and OSS.  Wouldn't this be 
even more work though?


This can easily happen if we get behind a developer.  ALSA has been
sponsored by SuSE for the benefit of Linux, and there's no reason we
can't pull together our resources to do the same for our OS.  I'm sure
someone will step forward to do the port if we have the cash for them to
comfortably sit in front of their computer until the port is complete.


I'd appreciate sponsoring somebody to work on our existing newpcm stuff and 
add the missing bits and pieces much more. Donating hardware (soundcards and 
MIDI-devices) would probably help very much already.

OSS is on the outs.  New applications that are ALSA only will soon be 
common, won't they?  Newpcm is what, five years old?  Whatever it is, it 
ain't new anymore.  Of course, maybe I'm completely mistaken about the 
whole situation and all newpcm needs is a boost.

What is the right answer?  Does OS X have a completely proprietary sound 
arch?  It would be nice to be able to work with what they've got too.

Pete...

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: Need ALSA [was: Re: MIDI on SB Live! ?]

2003-03-22 Thread cameron grant
Having a port of ALSA would sure round out 5.2 nicely, and would get you
MIDI support: http://www.alsa-project.org/
I think you wouldn't really do anyone a favour, including the ALSA
folks, if  you went and made a port right now. The ALSA project is still
not at 1.00  status and still quite in-flux.
One could go either way with this.  Leave it for after 1.0, or grab it
now and help build it up for a better 2.0.  Or I guess we could initiate
the ABSDSA and have support for both ALSA and OSS.  Wouldn't this be even
more work though?
porting alsa would gain very little and be a huge regression.

This can easily happen if we get behind a developer.  ALSA has been
sponsored by SuSE for the benefit of Linux, and there's no reason we
can't pull together our resources to do the same for our OS.  I'm sure
someone will step forward to do the port if we have the cash for them to
comfortably sit in front of their computer until the port is complete.


I'd appreciate sponsoring somebody to work on our existing newpcm stuff
and  add the missing bits and pieces much more. Donating hardware
(soundcards and  MIDI-devices) would probably help very much already.
OSS is on the outs.  New applications that are ALSA only will soon be
common, won't they?  Newpcm is what, five years old?  Whatever it is, it
ain't new anymore.  Of course, maybe I'm completely mistaken about the
whole situation and all newpcm needs is a boost.
you are completely mistaken.

first, let me correct some of the factual inaccuracies that you are 
propounding:

* newpcm is not even 4 years old yet.
* alsa is in no way desireable- it is not a device abstraction system. 
every app must do userland resampling to play, say 44.1khz sound on a 48khz 
only chipset.  given that it does not provide hardware abstraction, alsa's 
kernel components are far too complex.
* alsa drivers are difficult to write- compare one to its corresponding 
newpcm driver.
* newpcm has a much more advanced architecture than alsa, and is entirely 
different than oss.  the fact that newpcm's dsp and mixer layers implement 
the oss api is incidental.

newpcm v2, which may gain a better name, is under development.  i 
originally hoped to have it ready for 5.0, but very poor health over the 
last year prevented this.  instead, it will be targetted at 6.0 and 
probably backported to ~5.3+ once feature complete and demonstrably stable.

i will not elaborate here on the features planned for v2, but replacing the 
api is one of them, although oss compatibility will be provided.  there are 
a few people out there who know the plans, but they all know that i want 
them kept under wraps for now.

with only two main developers, you should not expect v2 to be committed 
much before the end of this year.  additional manpower would help, but 
don't volunteer if i'm going to have to spend time teaching you c, the 
kernel, kobj or the current design of newpcm.  someone well versed in dsp 
techniques and acquainted with the mathematics of accoustics would be very 
helpful.  money and/or hardware would be nice, but i at least am limited in 
speed by my body and nothing short of a few million dollars is likely to 
change that.

the single greatest incentive to continue that the community could provide 
is to refrain from suggesting that newpcm be scrapped or replaced, 
especially by proponents who are not willing to do the code themselves, do 
not have a replacement working prior to their proposal, and/or have little 
to zero knowledge of sound hardware and the requirements of a top-flight 
audio infrastructure.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: Need ALSA [was: Re: MIDI on SB Live! ?]

2003-03-22 Thread Marcin Dalecki
Peter Schultz wrote:
Michael Nottebrock wrote:

On Saturday 22 March 2003 14:52, Peter Schultz wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello,

just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative
EMU10K1 based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
Regards,
Julian Stecklina


Having a port of ALSA would sure round out 5.2 nicely, and would get you
MIDI support: http://www.alsa-project.org/


I think you wouldn't really do anyone a favour, including the ALSA 
folks, if you went and made a port right now. The ALSA project is 
still not at 1.00 status and still quite in-flux.

One could go either way with this.  Leave it for after 1.0, or grab it 
now and help build it up for a better 2.0.  Or I guess we could initiate 
the ABSDSA and have support for both ALSA and OSS.  Wouldn't this be 
even more work though?


This can easily happen if we get behind a developer.  ALSA has been
sponsored by SuSE for the benefit of Linux, and there's no reason we
can't pull together our resources to do the same for our OS.  I'm sure
someone will step forward to do the port if we have the cash for them to
comfortably sit in front of their computer until the port is complete.


I'd appreciate sponsoring somebody to work on our existing newpcm 
stuff and add the missing bits and pieces much more. Donating hardware 
(soundcards and MIDI-devices) would probably help very much already.

OSS is on the outs.  New applications that are ALSA only will soon be 
common, won't they? 
Alsa is condemned to driver + some silly user space daemon with naive
signal filter anyway. So no problem here.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: Need ALSA [was: Re: MIDI on SB Live! ?]

2003-03-22 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Saturday 22 March 2003 16:15, Peter Schultz wrote:

 OSS is on the outs.  New applications that are ALSA only will soon be
 common, won't they? 

No. In fact, there is quite an explosion in multimedia middleware projects 
right now and people are having heated discussions in other places which one 
is the most promising. :)

Don't expect many audio apps in the future to be talking directly to some API 
exported by a kernel.

-- 
Regards,
Michael Nottebrock

pgp0.pgp
Description: signature


Re: MIDI on SB Live! ?

2003-03-22 Thread Mathew Kanner
On Mar 22, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
 On Friday 21 March 2003 21:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative
  EMU10K1 based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
 On and off, as far as I can tell. If you want MIDI right now, take a look at 
 what 4Front Technologies offers in their commercial OSS package.

Hello Micheal and all, (this is reply targeted at the thread)

In not sure about 4front compatability with -current.

ALSA would require a complete rewrite to work for multiple
platforms because they are intimate with the linux pci interface.
IMHO, it would require a fork of their project.

MIDI in FreeBSD is highly hackable.  It took me only a couple
of days to get midi working for an es173x, a made a small web page a
few months ago, it was for 5.0-dp2 but would probably work with 5.0-R.
As it is, midi can be a kld and all that is required for a particular
card is basic IO.

The emu10k should be easier than most because we already have
code for a generic mpu401.

Here are some web links,

http://www.cnd.mcgill.ca/~mat/es137xmidi.html
(my small es137x midi page, mostly derived from other sources)

Nice references for midi hacking:

from NetBSD (it's .se.netbsd because .netbsd seems to be down)
http://cvsweb.se.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/midi.c
http://cvsweb.se.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/midisyn.c
http://cvsweb.se.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/sequencer.c
http://cvsweb.se.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/pci/esa.c
http://cvsweb.se.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/pci/emuxki.c
(oops, no midi for emu on netbsd)

from ALSA:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/alsa/alsa-kernel/drivers/mpu401/
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/alsa/alsa-kernel/pci/
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/alsa/alsa-kernel/pci/emu10k1/

After all of this, the reality is, very few people care about
midi for freebsd and it has been neglected for along time.  We're
lucky that the work done long ago still works.

--Mat

-- 
Brain: Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?
Pinky: I think so Brain, but pants with horizontal stripes make me
look chubby.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: MIDI on SB Live! ?

2003-03-22 Thread der_julian
Hello,

no luck here either:

http://www.opensound.com/readme/README.SBLive.html
- o EMU Wavetable MIDI synthesizer not yet supported

The only thing that is (partially) working seems to be ALSA.

Regards,
Julian

On 22-Mar-2003 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
 On Friday 21 March 2003 21:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

 just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative
 EMU10K1 based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
 
 On and off, as far as I can tell. If you want MIDI right now, take a look at 
 what 4Front Technologies offers in their commercial OSS package.
 
 -- 
 Regards,
   Michael Nottebrock

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: midi causes panic on boot? (update)

2001-03-26 Thread Szilveszter Adam

Hello Jim,

On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 07:20:04PM -0500, Jim Bloom wrote:
 I get a slightly different backtrace, but was able to use my palm pilot as the
 serial console.  I have had this same problem for quit a while (about a month).
 I suspect a locking issue related to Seigo Tanimura's commit on Feb 25.  My last
 cvsup was within the past 24 hours and the kernel was built in a clean
 directory.

Yes, same experience here. But I unfortunately did not have a serial
console handy. Tanimura's commits on March 14th were supposed to help the
situation, but they appearently haven't...:-(
 
 I can try to get more information if necessary.

I am still trying to figure out how to get more. I am not good with ddb,
and since the machine will not dump, gdb is not usable locally. (And again,
no serial connection handy:-( 'show witness' and 'show mutex' come to mind
as two more things I will try in ddb.

 trace
 _mtx_lock_sleep(c0ecda08,0,c036d471,268) at _mtx_lock_sleep+0x29a
 mpu_uartmode(c0ecda00) at mpu_uartmode+0x63
 mpu_attach(c0ebd100,c0ebd100,c0ebd100,c0e67080,c04e675c) at mpu_attach+0x25
 mpusbc_attach(c0ebd100,c0ebd100,c0ea5ac0,c036e926,1) at mpusbc_attach+0x19
 device_probe_and_attach(c0ebd100) at device_probe_and_attach+0x9a
 bus_generic_attach(c0ea2000,c0ebd080,c0ea5ac0,c0ea2000,c036e935) at
 bus_generic_attach+0x16
 sbc_attach(c0ea2000,c0eadb00,c0ea2000,7,0) at sbc_attach+0x3cc
 device_probe_and_attach(c0ea2000,c0404c4c,c03f9030,4eb000,c0eadb00) at
 device_probe_and_attach+0x9a
 isa_probe_children(c0ea2980,c04e6ff8,c01b1f74,0,4e4c00) at
 isa_probe_children+0x143
 configure(0,4e4c00,4e4000,0,c01277d2) at configure+0x39
 mi_startup() at mi_startup+0x68
 begin() at begin+0x29

Yes, I think we are looking at the same thing.
-- 
Regards:

Szilveszter ADAM
Szeged University
Szeged Hungary

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: midi causes panic on boot? (update)

2001-03-25 Thread Szilveszter Adam

Hello folks,

I have tried it with today's -CURRENT, and as soon as I try to boot a
kernel with the options (this has occured also earlier but wanted to make
sure that I try today's sources first)

device midi
device seq

(my sound card is a ISAPnP SB 64 AWE) 

I use device sbc too.

the kernel still panics with Fatal Trap 12. I have Seigo Tanimura's 
fixes, and yet this still happens. I do not have a serial console, so here
a short trace output transcribed:

_mtx_lock_sleep
mpu_uartmode
mpu_attach
mprobe_attach
device_probe_and_attach
bus_generic_attach
sbc_attach
device_probe_and_attach
isa_probe_children
configure
mi_startup()
begin()

At the point of panic not even the swap partition is available yet so the
machine does not dump. How can I force it? 

I would like to offer any and all help to anyone wanting to debug this; I
can reproduce the problem at will and luckily no FS corruption occurs
because the panic is so early on boot.:-)

Of course, as soon as I omit the midi part, the kernel boots fine, and the
sound card works too.  
-- 
Regards:

Szilveszter ADAM
Szeged University
Szeged Hungary

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: midi causes panic on boot? (update)

2001-03-25 Thread Jim Bloom

I get a slightly different backtrace, but was able to use my palm pilot as the
serial console.  I have had this same problem for quit a while (about a month).
I suspect a locking issue related to Seigo Tanimura's commit on Feb 25.  My last
cvsup was within the past 24 hours and the kernel was built in a clean
directory.

I can try to get more information if necessary.

Jim Bloom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address   = 0x1a0
fault code  = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01c8006
stack pointer   = 0x10:0xc04e66dc
frame pointer   = 0x10:0xc04e66db

trace
_mtx_lock_sleep(c0ecda08,0,c036d471,268) at _mtx_lock_sleep+0x29a
mpu_uartmode(c0ecda00) at mpu_uartmode+0x63
mpu_attach(c0ebd100,c0ebd100,c0ebd100,c0e67080,c04e675c) at mpu_attach+0x25
mpusbc_attach(c0ebd100,c0ebd100,c0ea5ac0,c036e926,1) at mpusbc_attach+0x19
device_probe_and_attach(c0ebd100) at device_probe_and_attach+0x9a
bus_generic_attach(c0ea2000,c0ebd080,c0ea5ac0,c0ea2000,c036e935) at
bus_generic_attach+0x16
sbc_attach(c0ea2000,c0eadb00,c0ea2000,7,0) at sbc_attach+0x3cc
device_probe_and_attach(c0ea2000,c0404c4c,c03f9030,4eb000,c0eadb00) at
device_probe_and_attach+0x9a
isa_probe_children(c0ea2980,c04e6ff8,c01b1f74,0,4e4c00) at
isa_probe_children+0x143
configure(0,4e4c00,4e4000,0,c01277d2) at configure+0x39
mi_startup() at mi_startup+0x68
begin() at begin+0x29

db panic
panic: from debugger
Debugger("panic")
Stopped at  _mtx_lock_sleep+0x29a:  movl0x1a0(%edx),%eax


Szilveszter Adam wrote:
 
 Hello folks,
 
 I have tried it with today's -CURRENT, and as soon as I try to boot a
 kernel with the options (this has occured also earlier but wanted to make
 sure that I try today's sources first)
 
 device midi
 device seq
 
 (my sound card is a ISAPnP SB 64 AWE)
 
 I use device sbc too.
 
 the kernel still panics with Fatal Trap 12. I have Seigo Tanimura's
 fixes, and yet this still happens. I do not have a serial console, so here
 a short trace output transcribed:
 
 _mtx_lock_sleep
 mpu_uartmode
 mpu_attach
 mprobe_attach
 device_probe_and_attach
 bus_generic_attach
 sbc_attach
 device_probe_and_attach
 isa_probe_children
 configure
 mi_startup()
 begin()
 
 At the point of panic not even the swap partition is available yet so the
 machine does not dump. How can I force it?
 
 I would like to offer any and all help to anyone wanting to debug this; I
 can reproduce the problem at will and luckily no FS corruption occurs
 because the panic is so early on boot.:-)
 
 Of course, as soon as I omit the midi part, the kernel boots fine, and the
 sound card works too.
 --
 Regards:
 
 Szilveszter ADAM
 Szeged University
 Szeged Hungary
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: midi causes panic on boot? + entropy gatherer works fine

2001-03-14 Thread Alex Zepeda

On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:38:50PM +0100, Szilveszter Adam wrote:

 I wonder if this is known? If not, I can certainly provide more
 information. The offending sound hw is a Creative SB 64 AWE ISAPnP card. It
 works fine otherwise. (as it always has)

Yup I'm seeing this too.  SMP kernel, AWE64 PnP.

- alex

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: midi causes panic on boot? + entropy gatherer works fine

2001-03-14 Thread Seigo Tanimura

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 00:49:53 -0800,
  Alex Zepeda [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

Alex On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:38:50PM +0100, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
 I wonder if this is known? If not, I can certainly provide more
 information. The offending sound hw is a Creative SB 64 AWE ISAPnP card. It
 works fine otherwise. (as it always has)

Alex Yup I'm seeing this too.  SMP kernel, AWE64 PnP.

If the kernel attempts to probe mpu to die, my last commit should fix
that.

-- 
Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: midi panics

2001-02-27 Thread Seigo Tanimura

On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:53:06 +0900,
  "Daniel C. Sobral" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

Daniel I'm getting fatal trap 12 with interrupts disabled related to the midi
Daniel code during boot.

Daniel Backtrace is:

Daniel _mtx_lock_sleep+0x23a
Daniel mpu_uartmode+0x3e
Daniel mpu_attach+0x25

mpu_uartmode() is called before init of scp-mtx.

-- 
Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message