Re: smbfs support
hi, there! On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:33:08PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote: > What is the state of smbfs for current at present? Boris Popov has updated kernel-side smbfs for KSE. Sheldon Hearn imported smbfs 1.4.3 userland (to both HEAD and RELENG_4). smbfs should work out of box. we still do not have libiconv in base system so if you want to do filenames recoding you have to install it from ports. /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs support
What is the state of smbfs for current at present? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs support
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > do these patches include the proc->thread changes needed? According to cvs logs - yes. -- Boris Popov http://rbp.euro.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs support
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > | I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this > > | week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and > > | already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs > > | is not compilable yet). > > > > Excellent news! > > Indeed. > > > Presumably, if bp doesn't respond by the end of the year, you'll go > > ahead regardless? :-) > > Actually, bp responded much faster than you expected :) > Patches submitted by Max were mostly correct except for two or three > lines and now committed to the tree. Again, special thanks to him for very > good work. > > However, I'm still don't have enough spare time and really hope > Max will import userland part of smbfs soon. > do these patches include the proc->thread changes needed? > -- > Boris Popov > http://rbp.euro.ru > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs support
On Sun, 02 Dec 2001 15:20:36 +0600, Boris Popov wrote: | > Presumably, if bp doesn't respond by the end of the year, you'll go | > ahead regardless? :-) | | Actually, bp responded much faster than you expected :) Yes. Sorry for spreading second-hand information as to your availability. :-) | Patches submitted by Max were mostly correct except for two or three | lines and now committed to the tree. Again, special thanks to him for very | good work. Fantastic! Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs support
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > | I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this > | week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and > | already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs > | is not compilable yet). > > Excellent news! Indeed. > Presumably, if bp doesn't respond by the end of the year, you'll go > ahead regardless? :-) Actually, bp responded much faster than you expected :) Patches submitted by Max were mostly correct except for two or three lines and now committed to the tree. Again, special thanks to him for very good work. However, I'm still don't have enough spare time and really hope Max will import userland part of smbfs soon. -- Boris Popov http://rbp.euro.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs support
SMBFS is broken, it will be fixed but I'm not sure when. the other broken one in NWFS On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Przemyslaw Kowalczyk wrote: > Hi. > > I'm trying to compile smbfs. I've added SMBFS and NETSMB options to my kernel > config, but I'm not sure is it enough. The output of make buildkernel is as > follows: > > -I/usr/src/sys/../include -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -elf > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_readvdir': > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:97: structure has no member named `uio_procp' > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_readvnode': > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:201: structure has no member named > `uio_procp' > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:205: warning: passing arg 3 of `vn_lock' > from incompatible pointer type > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:208: warning: passing arg 3 of `vn_lock' > from incompatible pointer type > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:215: warning: passing arg 4 of `VOP_GETATTR' > from incompatible pointer type > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:220: warning: passing arg 4 of `VOP_GETATTR' > from incompatible pointer type > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:186: warning: `p' might be used > uninitialized in this function > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_writevnode': > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:253: structure has no member named > `uio_procp' > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:241: warning: `p' might be used > uninitialized in this function > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_doio': > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:310: structure has no member named > `uio_procp' > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_getpages': > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:461: structure has no member named > `uio_procp' > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_putpages': > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:599: structure has no member named > `uio_procp' > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_vinvalbuf': > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:657: warning: passing arg 4 of `vinvalbuf' > from incompatible pointer type > /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:667: warning: passing arg 4 of `vinvalbuf' > from incompatible pointer type > > Is there any workaround for this? > > greets > > przem > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs support
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:58:10 +0600, Max Khon wrote: | :) | bp is quite responsive. I even had a talk with him on #bsdcode Even more good news. I look forward to forgetting about the smbfs port! :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs support
hi, there! On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:55:24PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > | I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this > | week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and > | already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs > | is not compilable yet). > > Excellent news! > > Presumably, if bp doesn't respond by the end of the year, you'll go > ahead regardless? :-) :) bp is quite responsive. I even had a talk with him on #bsdcode /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs support
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:47:15 +0600, Max Khon wrote: | I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this | week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and | already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs | is not compilable yet). Excellent news! Presumably, if bp doesn't respond by the end of the year, you'll go ahead regardless? :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs support
hi, there! On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:30:54PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > | I'm trying to compile smbfs. I've added SMBFS and NETSMB options to my kernel > | config, but I'm not sure is it enough. The output of make buildkernel is as > | follows: > > I don't think anyone's updated smbfs for the post-KSE world order. The > smbfs maintainer seems snowed under, and Julian wants someone who > understands it better to take a look. > > That was the case a couple of weeks ago, at any rate. I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs is not compilable yet). /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs support
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:06:00 +0100, Przemyslaw Kowalczyk wrote: | I'm trying to compile smbfs. I've added SMBFS and NETSMB options to my kernel | config, but I'm not sure is it enough. The output of make buildkernel is as | follows: I don't think anyone's updated smbfs for the post-KSE world order. The smbfs maintainer seems snowed under, and Julian wants someone who understands it better to take a look. That was the case a couple of weeks ago, at any rate. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
