Re: unable to get dumps?
It seems Larry Rosenman wrote: Also, when coming back up after the Panic on the same kernel, we get unexpected soft-update inconsistencies, cannot write block type errors from FSCK. Going back to my September 9, 2003 kernel, fsck deals with the same exact filesystem just fine. What if you use kernel src from sep 9 with just dev/ata updated to latest ? -Søren ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unable to get dumps?
--On Sunday, September 14, 2003 18:46:19 +0200 Soren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems Larry Rosenman wrote: Also, when coming back up after the Panic on the same kernel, we get unexpected soft-update inconsistencies, cannot write block type errors from FSCK. Going back to my September 9, 2003 kernel, fsck deals with the same exact filesystem just fine. What if you use kernel src from sep 9 with just dev/ata updated to latest ? how can I do that from a CVSup'd source tree? (I'm lucky to still have the 9/9/2003 binary). LER -Søren -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: unable to get dumps?
--On Sunday, September 14, 2003 18:46:19 +0200 Soren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems Larry Rosenman wrote: Also, when coming back up after the Panic on the same kernel, we get unexpected soft-update inconsistencies, cannot write block type errors from FSCK. Going back to my September 9, 2003 kernel, fsck deals with the same exact filesystem just fine. What if you use kernel src from sep 9 with just dev/ata updated to latest ? Also, did you see my note about the hang with ata-lowlevel.c r1.11? -Søren -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
