Re: SMP and threads...
"David E. Cross" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a threaded appilcation that is only running on one processor. I remember there was discussion about this in the past, and there was a solution, I think it involved a patch. Any pointers? http://lt.tar.com Tony. -- f.a.n.finch[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]e pluribus unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: SMP and threads...
|"David E. Cross" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: |I have a threaded appilcation that is only running on one processor. |I remember there was discussion about this in the past, and there was a |solution, I think it involved a patch. | |Any pointers? | |http://lt.tar.com And don't be turned off by the "outdated" tunnel Richard stuck up there, delete the two references to deferred signals in the libc_r code that gets copied over into the port. Then you get a thread implementation that still works better than libc_r for things like TAO. (Although I haven't had a chance to rerun the tests with the libc_r changes this week). Russell | |Tony. |-- |f.a.n.finch[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]e pluribus unix | | |To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message | To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
SMP and threads...
I have a threaded appilcation that is only running on one processor. I remember there was discussion about this in the past, and there was a solution, I think it involved a patch. Any pointers? -- David Cross | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Administrator/Research Programmer | Web: http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~crossd Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, | Ph: 518.276.2860 Department of Computer Science| Fax: 518.276.4033 I speak only for myself. | WinNT:Linux::Linux:FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
