Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)
Le 2003-09-19, Guillaume écrivait : Thanks for the patch. cd0 is faster now and ATAPICAM works great. Are you going to commit the patch? DMA is now enabled for ATAPI/CAM i/o, as of atapi-cam.c rev. 1.26. Thanks to all who tested and reviewed the change. Thomas. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote: Le 2003-09-19, Guillaume écrivait : Thanks for the patch. cd0 is faster now and ATAPICAM works great. Are you going to commit the patch? DMA is now enabled for ATAPI/CAM i/o, as of atapi-cam.c rev. 1.26. Thanks to all who tested and reviewed the change. No, thank you! dd'ing a full data CD before this fix had top showing at least 50% of the CPU time in interrupt - it's now down to the usual 5% or less. -Bryan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)
Le 2003-09-19, Guillaume écrivait : Thanks for the patch. cd0 is faster now and ATAPICAM works great. That's good news! Are you going to commit the patch? Yes, the patch is currently being reviewed. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote: Le 2003-09-18, Guillaume écrivait : The patch does nothing for me. Same results... and cd0 is still slow. OK, then please try to apply the patch below in addition to the previous one: Sorry, I hadn't really noticed or checked for speed issues before the first patch that you issued, only that I noticed the reported speed went from 3.3MB/s to 33.3MB/s. There is a new issue, though. Soren commited a change to ata-queue.c this morning. This change together with atapicam, causes the system to hang indefinitely after detecting ad0. Had to hit the reset button and boot from the previous kernel. Without atapicam, the system boots normally. -Bryan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)
Le Jeu 18/09/2003 à 15:32, Thomas Quinot a écrit : Le 2003-09-18, Guillaume écrivait : The patch does nothing for me. Same results... and cd0 is still slow. OK, then please try to apply the patch below in addition to the previous one: Thanks for the patch. cd0 is faster now and ATAPICAM works great. Are you going to commit the patch? Guillaume ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)
Le 2003-09-17, Guillaume écrivait : + if (atapi_dma atp-channel-dma + (atp-param-config ATA_DRQ_MASK) != ATA_DRQ_INTR) + atp-setmode(atadev, ATA_DMA_MAX); + else + atp-setmode(atadev, ATA_PIO_MAX); Ahem. Replace atadev with atp on both lines... Thomas. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote: Le 2003-09-17, Guillaume écrivait : + if (atapi_dma atp-channel-dma + (atp-param-config ATA_DRQ_MASK) != ATA_DRQ_INTR) + atp-setmode(atadev, ATA_DMA_MAX); + else + atp-setmode(atadev, ATA_PIO_MAX); Ahem. Replace atadev with atp on both lines... Thomas. The patch seems to work, my cd0 and cd1 lines in the dmesg now report 33.000 MB/s insetad of 3.300 MB/s. -Bryan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)
Le 2003-09-17, Bryan Liesner écrivait : The patch seems to work, my cd0 and cd1 lines in the dmesg now report 33.000 MB/s insetad of 3.300 MB/s. OK, good, so that's one half of the problem resolved. Now, can you test whether the actual performances are improved or still slow? Thomas. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)
Le Mer 17/09/2003 à 07:40, Thomas Quinot a écrit : Le 2003-09-17, Bryan Liesner écrivait : The patch seems to work, my cd0 and cd1 lines in the dmesg now report 33.000 MB/s insetad of 3.300 MB/s. OK, good, so that's one half of the problem resolved. Now, can you test whether the actual performances are improved or still slow? The patch does nothing for me. Same results... and cd0 is still slow. Guillaume ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)
Le 2003-09-06, Guillaume écrivait : I'm running FreeBSD 5-CURRENT (Aug. 28 2003) on a P3 733MHz, 768MB ram with a LG DVD-RW/DVD-RAM burner. I would like to know why ATAPICAM is so slow with my system. Maybe because ATAPI/CAM does not actually enable DMA. Can you try the following patch? Thomas. Index: atapi-cam.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c,v retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -r1.22 atapi-cam.c --- atapi-cam.c 11 Sep 2003 17:34:47 - 1.22 +++ atapi-cam.c 16 Sep 2003 13:20:18 - @@ -227,6 +227,11 @@ 2 * device_get_unit(atp-channel-dev) + (atp-unit == ATA_MASTER) ? 0 : 1); atp-softc = (void *)scp; + if (atapi_dma atp-channel-dma + (atp-param-config ATA_DRQ_MASK) != ATA_DRQ_INTR) + atp-setmode(atadev, ATA_DMA_MAX); + else + atp-setmode(atadev, ATA_PIO_MAX); } } -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)
Le Mar 16/09/2003 à 09:22, Thomas Quinot a écrit : Le 2003-09-06, Guillaume écrivait : I'm running FreeBSD 5-CURRENT (Aug. 28 2003) on a P3 733MHz, 768MB ram with a LG DVD-RW/DVD-RAM burner. I would like to know why ATAPICAM is so slow with my system. Maybe because ATAPI/CAM does not actually enable DMA. Can you try the following patch? I get an error when compiling kernel with this patch: cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../../../contrib/dev/acpica -I../../../contrib/ipfilter -I../../../contrib/dev/ath -I../../../contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=15000 -fno-strict-aliasing -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../dev/ata/atapi-cam.c ../../../dev/ata/atapi-cam.c: In function `setup_dev': ../../../dev/ata/atapi-cam.c:232: error: `atadev' undeclared (first use in this function) ../../../dev/ata/atapi-cam.c:232: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../../../dev/ata/atapi-cam.c:232: error: for each function it appears in.) *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GUILLAUME. Thomas. Index: atapi-cam.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c,v retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -r1.22 atapi-cam.c --- atapi-cam.c 11 Sep 2003 17:34:47 - 1.22 +++ atapi-cam.c 16 Sep 2003 13:20:18 - @@ -227,6 +227,11 @@ 2 * device_get_unit(atp-channel-dev) + (atp-unit == ATA_MASTER) ? 0 : 1); atp-softc = (void *)scp; + if (atapi_dma atp-channel-dma + (atp-param-config ATA_DRQ_MASK) != ATA_DRQ_INTR) + atp-setmode(atadev, ATA_DMA_MAX); + else + atp-setmode(atadev, ATA_PIO_MAX); } } ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)
Hi, I'm running FreeBSD 5-CURRENT (Aug. 28 2003) on a P3 733MHz, 768MB ram with a LG DVD-RW/DVD-RAM burner. I would like to know why ATAPICAM is so slow with my system. DMA is enabled for my ATAPI burner. When I'm copying something using cd0, my system is very slow. (e.g. my mouse moves very very slowly) Here is the results of my tests: Using mkisofs with acd0: # mount_cd9660 /dev/acd0 /dvdrom # time mkisofs -dvd-video -o /divers/acd0.iso /dvdrom/ 0.24% done, estimate finish Fri Sep 5 22:33:31 2003 0.48% done, estimate finish Fri Sep 5 22:33:30 2003 ... 99.54% done, estimate finish Fri Sep 5 22:26:55 2003 99.78% done, estimate finish Fri Sep 5 22:26:55 2003 Total translation table size: 0 Total rockridge attributes bytes: 0 Total directory bytes: 4096 Path table size(bytes): 42 Max brk space used c2e4 2064560 extents written (4032 Mb) real14m2.575s user0m16.109s sys 2m43.673s Using mkisofs with cd0 (ATAPICAM): -- # mount_cd9660 /dev/cd0 /dvdrom # time mkisofs -dvd-video -o /divers/cd0.iso /dvdrom/ 0.24% done, estimate finish Fri Sep 5 23:01:41 2003 0.48% done, estimate finish Fri Sep 5 22:58:14 2003 ... 99.54% done, estimate finish Fri Sep 5 22:59:20 2003 99.78% done, estimate finish Fri Sep 5 22:59:21 2003 Total translation table size: 0 Total rockridge attributes bytes: 0 Total directory bytes: 4096 Path table size(bytes): 42 Max brk space used c2e4 2064560 extents written (4032 Mb) real25m9.761s user0m22.586s sys 3m13.866s Using dd with acd0 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] time dd if=/dev/acd0 of=/divers/lepianiste.img bs=2k 2064816+0 records in 2064816+0 records out 4228743168 bytes transferred in 2646.410996 secs (1597916 bytes/sec) real44m6.434s user0m5.517s sys 6m27.386s Using dd with cd0 (ATAPICAM) My computer reboot after ~ 15 or 20 min. Output from dmesg: -- ... ad0: 29325MB Maxtor 6E030L0 [59582/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 ad1: 19595MB QUANTUM FIREBALLP LM20.5 [39813/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA66 acd0: DVDR HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GMA-4020B at ata1-master UDMA33 cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GMA-4020B A108 Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers cd0: cd present [2064816 x 2048 byte records] Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a ... Thanks Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
