Re: follow up on acpi issue
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote: Thanks, Nate. When you suggested that I remove the apm stuff fron the kernel, you meant ALL of the apm stuff, didn't you :) . I took a second look and found I still had viapm and its requirements still in the config file. The system boots fine now with acpi. By the way, the system didn't hang as I claimed in my earlier mail. I was able to telnet in... Having acpi and viapm had the side effect of making the console go away. viapm is VIA power management, not an apm system. It's interesting that it made your console go away. I'm sending this back to -current to see if anyone has ideas what might be wrong with viapm. -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: follow up on acpi issue
I have viapm, smb, and acpi enabled on my system, and console is not gone. It works just fine. I can [ctrl-alt]-F[1-8] as normal and xdm works just fine. I can get a dmesg and kernel config if people want it. On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:36:18PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: : On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote: : Thanks, Nate. When you suggested that I remove the apm stuff fron the : kernel, you meant ALL of the apm stuff, didn't you :) . I took a : second look and found I still had viapm and its requirements still in : the config file. The system boots fine now with acpi. : : By the way, the system didn't hang as I claimed in my earlier mail. I : was able to telnet in... Having acpi and viapm had the side effect of : making the console go away. : : viapm is VIA power management, not an apm system. It's interesting that : it made your console go away. I'm sending this back to -current to see if : anyone has ideas what might be wrong with viapm. : : -Nate : To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: follow up on acpi issue
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote: Thanks, Nate. When you suggested that I remove the apm stuff fron the kernel, you meant ALL of the apm stuff, didn't you :) . I took a second look and found I still had viapm and its requirements still in the config file. The system boots fine now with acpi. By the way, the system didn't hang as I claimed in my earlier mail. I was able to telnet in... Having acpi and viapm had the side effect of making the console go away. viapm is VIA power management, not an apm system. It's interesting that it made your console go away. I'm sending this back to -current to see if anyone has ideas what might be wrong with viapm. I had viapm and its requirements (iicbus, iicsmb) compiled in to my 4.7 kernel so that I could use mbmon to monitor temperatures, etc. Mbmon works just fine without it on 5.0 (a benefit of acpi??). -- == = Bryan D. Liesner LeezSoft Communications, Inc. = = A subsidiary of LeezSoft Inc. = = [EMAIL PROTECTED]Home of the Gipper= == To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
