Re: libexecinfo?
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:57:35PM +, Walter Hurry wrote: We had a recent issue with libiconv now being included in base, thus rendering the port superfluous. Does a similar situation exist with libexecinfo? I don't seem to need the port on on 10.0-ALPHA1 r255587, and htop and ruby both build quite happily without it. The library is /usr/lib/libexecinfo.so.1. libexecinfo in base is exactly the same as the on from ports, so it should be a change that doesn't require any manual operations. regards, Bapt pgpB2Sr7_laQj.pgp Description: PGP signature
libexecinfo?
We had a recent issue with libiconv now being included in base, thus rendering the port superfluous. Does a similar situation exist with libexecinfo? I don't seem to need the port on on 10.0-ALPHA1 r255587, and htop and ruby both build quite happily without it. The library is /usr/lib/libexecinfo.so.1. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: libexecinfo?
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:11:50 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:57:35PM +, Walter Hurry wrote: We had a recent issue with libiconv now being included in base, thus rendering the port superfluous. Does a similar situation exist with libexecinfo? I don't seem to need the port on on 10.0-ALPHA1 r255587, and htop and ruby both build quite happily without it. The library is /usr/lib/libexecinfo.so.1. libexecinfo in base is exactly the same as the on from ports, so it should be a change that doesn't require any manual operations. Ah, right. Thanks. Then I can safely do as I already have; i.e. remove the libexecinfo package and recompile those affected. This on the grounds that the fewer unnecessary ports the better, imho. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: libexecinfo?
On 18 September 2013 13:11, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: libexecinfo in base is exactly the same as the on from ports, so it should be a change that doesn't require any manual operations. To clarify, it is not the same code, but provides exactly the same interface. The one now in base comes from NetBSD and should work on all architectures. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
