Re: misc/15421 (was: Re: initgroups)

2001-11-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:43:52PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 04:27:03PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:12:50PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:02:39PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> 
> > > > While this is indeed a good thing to do, this is completely
> > > > unrelated to the above mentioned problem, and should be done
> > > > separately.  Here's the list of src/ files that do not check the
> > > > return value of initgroups(3), and may need to be fixed, but some
> > > > of them explicitly ignore the result to indicate the fact they
> > > > consider this error non-fatal.
> 
> > > > libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c
> > > > libexec/rexecd/rexecd.c
> > > > usr.bin/calendar/calendar.c
> > > > usr.sbin/inetd/inetd.c
> > > 
> > > There used to be *many* more problematic files.  Please see
> > > 
> > > 
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=801566+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2001/freebsd-stable/20010722.freebsd-stable
> > > 
> > > To my knowledge, only printjob.c was fixed, though I have not looked
> > > into every file in the list since then.
> 
> > Yes, but I specifically left contrib/ and crypto/ files, and files that
> > do not check the result of other calls like setgrp() etc.
> 
> We do not want to omit contrib/ files, since the whole hoopla started
> because of the contrib/cvs/.
> 
> > > But as I said in the private message, I do not feel strongly about
> > > this, and I think that the fix can be safely committed.  I do not
> > > think these things are quite unrelated, though.  :-)
> 
> > Not checking the return value is always BAD except when (not) done
> > intentionally (flagged by a(void)ing the return value of a function),
> > whether or not a function in question prints some diagnostic output on
> > standard error; that's why I still think these problems are in fact
> > unrelated.  :-)
> 
> In this case your own version of the fix should be modified from
> 
> +   getgrouplist(uname, agroup, groups, &ngroups);
> +   return (setgroups(ngroups, groups);
> 
> to
> 
> +   (void) getgrouplist(uname, agroup, groups, &ngroups);
> +   return (setgroups(ngroups, groups);
> 
> , to be pedantic. :-)
> 
Not actually, because getgrouplist(3) is special in that -1 is not
actually an error, but an indication that the resulting array was
too small to hold all groups.  :-)

> The point I am trying to (not very strongly) make is that we at least
> have some indication that there is a problem with the current behavior
> (with the exception of the daemons with closed/redirected to /dev/null
> stderr).  By (rightfully) fixing initgroups(), we loose even this
> precious little diagnostic we have.  That's why initgroups() fix and the
> code audit are probably best done at the same time - unless we can
> guarantee the audit part will not be forgotten.
> 
Sure, you can just change the synopsis of your PR.  :-)


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov  Oracle Developer/DBA,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sunbay Software AG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org  The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com   Enabling The Information Age

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: misc/15421 (was: Re: initgroups)

2001-11-20 Thread Anton Berezin

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 04:27:03PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:12:50PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:02:39PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:

> > > While this is indeed a good thing to do, this is completely
> > > unrelated to the above mentioned problem, and should be done
> > > separately.  Here's the list of src/ files that do not check the
> > > return value of initgroups(3), and may need to be fixed, but some
> > > of them explicitly ignore the result to indicate the fact they
> > > consider this error non-fatal.

> > > libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c
> > > libexec/rexecd/rexecd.c
> > > usr.bin/calendar/calendar.c
> > > usr.sbin/inetd/inetd.c
> > 
> > There used to be *many* more problematic files.  Please see
> > 
> > 
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=801566+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2001/freebsd-stable/20010722.freebsd-stable
> > 
> > To my knowledge, only printjob.c was fixed, though I have not looked
> > into every file in the list since then.

> Yes, but I specifically left contrib/ and crypto/ files, and files that
> do not check the result of other calls like setgrp() etc.

We do not want to omit contrib/ files, since the whole hoopla started
because of the contrib/cvs/.

> > But as I said in the private message, I do not feel strongly about
> > this, and I think that the fix can be safely committed.  I do not
> > think these things are quite unrelated, though.  :-)

> Not checking the return value is always BAD except when (not) done
> intentionally (flagged by a(void)ing the return value of a function),
> whether or not a function in question prints some diagnostic output on
> standard error; that's why I still think these problems are in fact
> unrelated.  :-)

In this case your own version of the fix should be modified from

+   getgrouplist(uname, agroup, groups, &ngroups);
+   return (setgroups(ngroups, groups);

to

+   (void) getgrouplist(uname, agroup, groups, &ngroups);
+   return (setgroups(ngroups, groups);

, to be pedantic. :-)

The point I am trying to (not very strongly) make is that we at least
have some indication that there is a problem with the current behavior
(with the exception of the daemons with closed/redirected to /dev/null
stderr).  By (rightfully) fixing initgroups(), we loose even this
precious little diagnostic we have.  That's why initgroups() fix and the
code audit are probably best done at the same time - unless we can
guarantee the audit part will not be forgotten.

Cheers,
$Anton.
-- 
| Anton Berezin|  FreeBSD: The power to serve |
| catpipe Systems ApS   _ _ |_ |   http://www.FreeBSD.org |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED](_(_||  |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 
| +45 7021 0050| Private: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: misc/15421 (was: Re: initgroups)

2001-11-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:12:50PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:02:39PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:28:55PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> 
> > > I asked tobez (he is an originator and he took responsibility on
> > > this PR) and he said that src/ must be audited also -- he said that
> > > some initgroups() callers do not print error message because
> > > initgroups() did this previously.
> > > 
> > > I'll try to do this before this weekend and I will post combined
> > > patch to audit@
> 
> > While this is indeed a good thing to do, this is completely unrelated to
> > the above mentioned problem, and should be done separately.  Here's the
> > list of src/ files that do not check the return value of initgroups(3),
> > and may need to be fixed, but some of them explicitly ignore the result
> > to indicate the fact they consider this error non-fatal.
> 
> > libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c
> > libexec/rexecd/rexecd.c
> > usr.bin/calendar/calendar.c
> > usr.sbin/inetd/inetd.c
> 
> There used to be *many* more problematic files.  Please see
> 
> 
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=801566+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2001/freebsd-stable/20010722.freebsd-stable
> 
> To my knowledge, only printjob.c was fixed, though I have not looked
> into every file in the list since then.
> 
Yes, but I specifically left contrib/ and crypto/ files, and files that
do not check the result of other calls like setgrp() etc.

> But as I said in the private message, I do not feel strongly about this,
> and I think that the fix can be safely committed.  I do not think these
> things are quite unrelated, though.  :-)
> 
Not checking the return value is always BAD except when (not) done
intentionally (flagged by a(void)ing the return value of a function),
whether or not a function in question prints some diagnostic output
on standard error; that's why I still think these problems are in
fact unrelated.  :-)


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov  Oracle Developer/DBA,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sunbay Software AG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org  The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com   Enabling The Information Age

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: misc/15421 (was: Re: initgroups)

2001-11-20 Thread Anton Berezin

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:02:39PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:28:55PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:

> > I asked tobez (he is an originator and he took responsibility on
> > this PR) and he said that src/ must be audited also -- he said that
> > some initgroups() callers do not print error message because
> > initgroups() did this previously.
> > 
> > I'll try to do this before this weekend and I will post combined
> > patch to audit@

> While this is indeed a good thing to do, this is completely unrelated to
> the above mentioned problem, and should be done separately.  Here's the
> list of src/ files that do not check the return value of initgroups(3),
> and may need to be fixed, but some of them explicitly ignore the result
> to indicate the fact they consider this error non-fatal.

> libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c
> libexec/rexecd/rexecd.c
> usr.bin/calendar/calendar.c
> usr.sbin/inetd/inetd.c

There used to be *many* more problematic files.  Please see

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=801566+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2001/freebsd-stable/20010722.freebsd-stable

To my knowledge, only printjob.c was fixed, though I have not looked
into every file in the list since then.

But as I said in the private message, I do not feel strongly about this,
and I think that the fix can be safely committed.  I do not think these
things are quite unrelated, though.  :-)

Cheers,
\Anton.
-- 
| Anton Berezin|  FreeBSD: The power to serve |
| catpipe Systems ApS   _ _ |_ |   http://www.FreeBSD.org |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED](_(_||  |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 
| +45 7021 0050| Private: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: misc/15421 (was: Re: initgroups)

2001-11-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov

On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:28:55PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> hi, there!
> 
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 06:19:50PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> 
> > > Can setgroups return a positive number?  If so, you've just changed
> > > the semantics of the funtion; before, it used to return 0 on 0 or a
> > > positive number.
> > > 
> > No.  setgroups() is a syscall, and as such returns either 0 or -1.
> > 
> > > Also, is removing the _warn() really the only thing you want to
> > > accomplish?  It should probably be seperate.
> > > 
> > I have intended to commit the below patch for almost a year now,
> > just haven't had enough time to actually fo it.  NetBSD runs with
> > this fix since 1999.
> > 
> > Index: initgroups.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/gen/initgroups.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.4
> > diff -u -p -r1.4 initgroups.c
> > --- initgroups.c2001/08/29 13:52:26 1.4
> > +++ initgroups.c2001/11/19 16:16:11
> > @@ -56,12 +56,6 @@ initgroups(uname, agroup)
> > int groups[NGROUPS], ngroups;
> >  
> > ngroups = NGROUPS;
> > -   if (getgrouplist(uname, agroup, groups, &ngroups) < 0)
> > -   warnx("%s is in too many groups, using first %d",
> > -   uname, ngroups);
> > -   if (setgroups(ngroups, groups) < 0) {
> > -   _warn("setgroups");
> > -   return (-1);
> > -   }
> > -   return (0);
> > +   getgrouplist(uname, agroup, groups, &ngroups);
> > +   return (setgroups(ngroups, groups);

There's a missing closing parenthesis above, sorry.

> > Index: initgroups.3
[...]

> I asked tobez (he is an originator and he took responsibility on this PR)
> and he said that src/ must be audited also -- he said that some initgroups()
> callers do not print error message because initgroups() did this
> previously.
> 
> I'll try to do this before this weekend and I will post combined patch
> to audit@
> 
While this is indeed a good thing to do, this is completely unrelated to
the above mentioned problem, and should be done separately.  Here's the
list of src/ files that do not check the return value of initgroups(3),
and may need to be fixed, but some of them explicitly ignore the result
to indicate the fact they consider this error non-fatal.

libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c
libexec/rexecd/rexecd.c
usr.bin/calendar/calendar.c
usr.sbin/inetd/inetd.c


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov  Oracle Developer/DBA,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sunbay Software AG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org  The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com   Enabling The Information Age

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: misc/15421 (was: Re: initgroups)

2001-11-19 Thread Max Khon

hi, there!

On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 06:19:50PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:

> > Can setgroups return a positive number?  If so, you've just changed
> > the semantics of the funtion; before, it used to return 0 on 0 or a
> > positive number.
> > 
> No.  setgroups() is a syscall, and as such returns either 0 or -1.
> 
> > Also, is removing the _warn() really the only thing you want to
> > accomplish?  It should probably be seperate.
> > 
> I have intended to commit the below patch for almost a year now,
> just haven't had enough time to actually fo it.  NetBSD runs with
> this fix since 1999.
> 
> Index: initgroups.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/gen/initgroups.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -p -r1.4 initgroups.c
> --- initgroups.c  2001/08/29 13:52:26 1.4
> +++ initgroups.c  2001/11/19 16:16:11
> @@ -56,12 +56,6 @@ initgroups(uname, agroup)
>   int groups[NGROUPS], ngroups;
>  
>   ngroups = NGROUPS;
> - if (getgrouplist(uname, agroup, groups, &ngroups) < 0)
> - warnx("%s is in too many groups, using first %d",
> - uname, ngroups);
> - if (setgroups(ngroups, groups) < 0) {
> - _warn("setgroups");
> - return (-1);
> - }
> - return (0);
> + getgrouplist(uname, agroup, groups, &ngroups);
> + return (setgroups(ngroups, groups);
>  }
> Index: initgroups.3
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/gen/initgroups.3,v
> retrieving revision 1.10
> diff -u -p -r1.10 initgroups.3
> --- initgroups.3  2001/10/01 16:08:51 1.10
> +++ initgroups.3  2001/11/19 16:16:11
> @@ -61,10 +61,14 @@ is automatically included in the groups 
>  Typically this value is given as
>  the group number from the password file.
>  .Sh RETURN VALUES
> +.Rv -std initgroups
> +.Sh ERRORS
>  The
>  .Fn initgroups
> -function
> -returns \-1 if it was not invoked by the super-user.
> +function may fail and set
> +.Va errno
> +for any of the errors specified for the library function
> +.Xr setgroups 2 .
>  .Sh SEE ALSO
>  .Xr setgroups 2 ,
>  .Xr getgrouplist 3

ok

I asked tobez (he is an originator and he took responsibility on this PR)
and he said that src/ must be audited also -- he said that some initgroups()
callers do not print error message because initgroups() did this
previously.

I'll try to do this before this weekend and I will post combined patch
to audit@

/fjoe

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: misc/15421 (was: Re: initgroups)

2001-11-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:28:57PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Max Khon wrote:
> > 
> > hi, there!
> > 
> > Any objections if I will commit the following patch (see PR/15421)?
> 
> Can setgroups return a positive number?  If so, you've just changed
> the semantics of the funtion; before, it used to return 0 on 0 or a
> positive number.
> 
No.  setgroups() is a syscall, and as such returns either 0 or -1.

> Also, is removing the _warn() really the only thing you want to
> accomplish?  It should probably be seperate.
> 
I have intended to commit the below patch for almost a year now,
just haven't had enough time to actually fo it.  NetBSD runs with
this fix since 1999.

Index: initgroups.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/gen/initgroups.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 initgroups.c
--- initgroups.c2001/08/29 13:52:26 1.4
+++ initgroups.c2001/11/19 16:16:11
@@ -56,12 +56,6 @@ initgroups(uname, agroup)
int groups[NGROUPS], ngroups;
 
ngroups = NGROUPS;
-   if (getgrouplist(uname, agroup, groups, &ngroups) < 0)
-   warnx("%s is in too many groups, using first %d",
-   uname, ngroups);
-   if (setgroups(ngroups, groups) < 0) {
-   _warn("setgroups");
-   return (-1);
-   }
-   return (0);
+   getgrouplist(uname, agroup, groups, &ngroups);
+   return (setgroups(ngroups, groups);
 }
Index: initgroups.3
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/gen/initgroups.3,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.10 initgroups.3
--- initgroups.32001/10/01 16:08:51 1.10
+++ initgroups.32001/11/19 16:16:11
@@ -61,10 +61,14 @@ is automatically included in the groups 
 Typically this value is given as
 the group number from the password file.
 .Sh RETURN VALUES
+.Rv -std initgroups
+.Sh ERRORS
 The
 .Fn initgroups
-function
-returns \-1 if it was not invoked by the super-user.
+function may fail and set
+.Va errno
+for any of the errors specified for the library function
+.Xr setgroups 2 .
 .Sh SEE ALSO
 .Xr setgroups 2 ,
 .Xr getgrouplist 3


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov  Oracle Developer/DBA,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sunbay Software AG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org  The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com   Enabling The Information Age

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message