[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 --- Comment #11 from Dave Cottlehuber --- this doesn't recur for me (ampere emag) since 9ae91f59c500, the latest CURRENT stab week. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 --- Comment #10 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to Dave Cottlehuber from comment #9) As I noted, the patch is wrong. The resulting sysfs nodes' structure is different from the structure observed on Linux. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 --- Comment #9 from Dave Cottlehuber --- kib@ for stab week this would be a great fix to go in, if your patch is generic enough? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 --- Comment #8 from Dave Cottlehuber --- also seeing this on ampere emag, with mlx5en nics thus linuxkpi also required kib thanks this boots fine with the patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 Konstantin Belousov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@freebsd.org --- Comment #7 from Konstantin Belousov --- *** Bug 279581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 --- Comment #6 from Zeev Zilberman --- Colin, no immediate need for linsysfs. I enabled it while trying to set up something in my test environment and then encountered this bug after fixing the issue reported in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278233 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 --- Comment #5 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to Colin Percival from comment #4) In principle yes. I would not have time for this until Nvidia needs the fix again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 --- Comment #4 from Colin Percival --- kib: Would it be possible to reproduce the linsysfs tree given the output zeev has provided? zeev: Do you actually want linsysfs? The backtrace looks like you're kldloading it; I'm not sure if this is deliberate or not since I can't imagine Amazon needing to run Linux binaries on FreeBSD. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 278234] linsysfs assumes pci domain 0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278234 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|emulat...@freebsd.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
