Two password prompts with 'su'

2005-04-27 Thread Justin Bennett
All,
Recently my machine (FreeBSD) started showing 2 password prompts when 
using su.

The first password seems to suffice, then hitting 'enter' on the second 
one lets me in.

Any ideas what is going on?
While I was writing this, it occurred to me that it may have something 
to do with Winbindd and nsswitch.conf.(?)

### Contents of nsswitch.conf ###
passwd: files winbind
group:  files winbind
### End ###
Thanks,
Justin
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


iSCSI (revisited?)

2005-04-04 Thread Justin Bennett
All,
I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI and FreeBSD. Is it a viable 
option for creating SANs?

I want to move away from tape backups, and have numerous production 
FreeBSD machines that I need to back up data from.

Any other ideas for a disk to disk backup solution that people have used?
Thanks,
Justin
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Supported SATA Cards

2005-01-03 Thread Justin Bennett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I was looking into getting an Adaptec 2410SA SATA (Serial ATA RAID
card). I just wanted to ensure this is supported by FreeBSD.
I looked at the hardware list, and there is a card listed under the aac
driver as a SCSI device, but with the 2410SA designation.
Is this the same card?
Thanks,
Justin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFB2dgKlNUG+Ne1CZMRAhsbAJ0VNGqTwsSWZ5efuCmTueC3/mjtMwCfZxTV
w0Cmp9/92WGvm+FQihKc7DY=
=13Iu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ipfw pipes: theoretical speed vs. reality

2004-11-02 Thread Justin Bennett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|
|
| Justin Bennett wrote:
|
| All,
|
| I have recently been setting up pipes to shape bandwidth on our local
| net.
|
| However, unless I am missing something, the TCP overhead seems quite
| large.
|
| If I configure the following pipe:
|
| $IPFW pipe 1 config bw 64Kbit/s
| $IPFW add 31 pipe 1 ip from 192.168.0.1/24 to any
| $IPFW add 32 pipe 1 ip from any to 192.168.0.1/24
|
| The run traffic from my machine (192.168.0.2) through it, I get less
| than half the expected bandwidth (3.9KB/s). I tried another test with a
| 512Kbit/s pipe, and got around 30KB/s.
|
| I know on most ATM/FR lines, you can expect about 10% overhead, but 50%
| seems high.
|
| When I remove the pipe, my T1 comes back to life, and I can pull the
| same data at 160+KB/s.
|
| Am I missing something?
|
|
|
|> yes you are queuing data in both directions on the same queue, thus
|> serialising it..
|
|> use 2 seprarate pipes. one for each direction.
Thanks. I knew it was simple, just couldn't wrap my head around it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFBh+SDlNUG+Ne1CZMRAl4WAJ9DEaiyU9N/SPKGi6WlqdHe2qkhmwCghv7m
So0IGU5OchsjXYHduNPm4C8=
=ZjYx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


ipfw pipes: theoretical speed vs. reality

2004-11-02 Thread Justin Bennett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I have recently been setting up pipes to shape bandwidth on our local net.
However, unless I am missing something, the TCP overhead seems quite large.
If I configure the following pipe:
$IPFW pipe 1 config bw 64Kbit/s
$IPFW add 31 pipe 1 ip from 192.168.0.1/24 to any
$IPFW add 32 pipe 1 ip from any to 192.168.0.1/24
The run traffic from my machine (192.168.0.2) through it, I get less
than half the expected bandwidth (3.9KB/s). I tried another test with a
512Kbit/s pipe, and got around 30KB/s.
I know on most ATM/FR lines, you can expect about 10% overhead, but 50%
seems high.
When I remove the pipe, my T1 comes back to life, and I can pull the
same data at 160+KB/s.
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Justin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFBh+I8lNUG+Ne1CZMRAl95AJ973J3YiUIStcyJ5c5gM+i2lrebTACfUE83
4V9bl8bR9GxjHsKqL764hJk=
=gc51
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"