Re: FreeBSD Mall now BSDCentral

2001-07-10 Thread Olaf Hoyer




  ... or maybe we should remind ourselves that the only thing
  official about FreeBSD is the code. Let the CD vendors figure
  out ways to attract customers from each other, lets worry more
  about ways to attract 'customers' from other operating systems.

Bill and Jordan are right on this one, guys.  We (as in FreeBSD) can put
up the ISOs and every Tom, Dick and Harry with a CD burner can distribute
FreeBSD, and differentiate themselves on packaging, sales channel, and
customer service.  Who knows, we might even get a few local shops to pre-
install FreeBSD on a machine or two, with their own FreeBSD discs thrown
in.  It could happen.  I'll talk to SuperDale and see if Totally Awesome
Computers will do this, they run their web site on FreeBSD.

Hi folks!

Well, I'm just returning from german Linuxtag, one of the biggest events 
concernung free software. (http://www.linuxtag.org)

We ran also a booth there, providing information ( I also held some speech 
there, covering the history of BSD) and some contacts.

We agreed to do something in Europe:

- providing informational structure for BSD
- providing a channel where people that want to do booths at exhibitions etc
may contact and get some help, pre-financing (perhaps) and merchandise articles
to help financing the whole thing.

Basically, those people who showed up at our booth asked:

Well, ok, it seems that this is a good OS, but where/whom can I contact in 
case of trouble?
Who provides _commercial_ support?
I'd love to buy a T-Shirt or a pin, can you sell me one?
I already use BSD, but are there any books about it?
((No, not the handbook. People love to pay for additional literature 
helping make the bookshelf look cool.)

So there certainly is money involved, and if we could organize it in a way, 
that money flows back to the project respectively into activities that help 
promoting BSD, that should be fine.

This also includes the possibility (which needs to be checked for 
legal/trade commision issued yet) to provide any user with the possibility 
to order some CDs, T-Shirts whatsoever.

BTW: BSD stands herein for: Free/Net/OpenBSD, BSD/OS, MacOS X, as far the 
BSD portion is concerned.

Any input? Maybe we should take this over to -chat.

Olaf


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Anybody know the OS in the Maxtor MAXAttach products?

2000-09-28 Thread Olaf Hoyer



Alfred Perlstein wrote:
 
 * Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000927 16:12] wrote:
  
  
   One of the comments on the side is:
  
   "Caching file system with Soft Update technology".
  
   Sounds vaguely BSD'ish.  Maybe even FreeBSD'ish.
 
  It is.  This product is based on FreeBSD 3.2 if I'm not mistaken.
 
 Several other companies are using FreeBSD for thier all-in-one
 fileserver appliances, afaik Quantum as well.
Hi!

Yes, Quantum uses a patched BSD in their Snap! Servers.

I will get one (Snap 2000/40GB)for promotion issues for a BSD booth at a
local Linux fair.
They also support those M$/Novell directory services/permissions...

Regards
Olaf Hoyer


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: PCI Plug 'n' Pray and old BIOSes

2000-06-19 Thread Olaf Hoyer

At 11:05 19.06.00 +0200, Graham Wheeler wrote:
Hi all

I have a Genius Hub Card (basically an Ethernet NIC that also acts as a
four port hub). I would ideally like to use this card in an old 486DX4
machine which acts as a ppp router. The card is detected (under both
Windoze and FreeBSD) as a RealTek card (the model number escapes me
right now).

I installed 4.0-R on this machine, which detects the card, but gives me
"ed0: device timeout" messages. Usually this is because the interrupt is
misconfigured, but I don't think that is the case here.

As I was under time pressure, I pulled the card out and put it in a
different machine, this one a P166 which works fine (with the same IRQ).

Anyway, when I get a chance I would like to try it again in the 486. The
486 has three PCI slots, and the BIOS has some additional settings which
may be the reason it wasn't working. I'm unfamiliar with what some of
these do, and am hoping that someone on the list may have experience
with early days of PCI and Plug 'n Play, and be able to help.

These are the settings:

Slot n IRQ Line (this is the only one I set on my first attempt, to 12)
Slot n Latency Timer (ranges from 0..255 PCICLK) (was on 255)
On Board PCI/SCSI BIOS Enabled/Disabled (was disabled)
CC State Machine:
  Data Write 0 WS Enabled/Disabled (was disabled)
  Data Read 0 WS Enabled/Disabled (was disabled)

Hi!

The card normally should act and behave at least as a normal NE2000 clone (ed0)
But as stated before, you might have to jumper it into the mobo.
Also the PCI latency is IMHO too high.
Try setting it at around 40.

If you want to check out possible IRQ conflicts (at least on PCI bus with
vid cards), there are some programs (ok, DOS based) that give out very
reliable figures.

Otherwise try the config utility of the card and put it into jumperless
mode, no pnp.

Regards
Olaf Hoyer
----
Olaf Hoyer   www.nightfire.demailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD- Turning PC's into workstations   ICQ:22838075

Liebe und Hass sind nicht blind, aber geblendet vom Feuer,
dass sie selber mit sich tragen. (Nietzsche)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: [OT] Finding people with GSM phones (was Re: GPS heads up )

2000-05-06 Thread Olaf Hoyer

At 12:09 06.05.00 -0700, you wrote:
 There were some famous cases where some criminals were located by tracking
 down their cell phone. The police needed some decision from court to do
 that, but after that, it was a short way to go. The GSM nets have some of
 this ability built in, to track phones. The operators only don't want the
 "normal" citizen or user to know about that.

This capability of GSM was well known when it was introduced in .au, but 
when my phone was stolen, the telco bastards wouldn't admit to being able 
to tell me anything about where it was (even though I could still call 
it...).

What's being proposed here sounds just slightly scary.

hi!

Well, thats reality.
Sometimes the mobile telco hotlines are so overloaded, you cannot even tell
them that your phone was stolen. (Talk about service-but you get what you
pay for)
In germany, there is some list, where every cell phone can be entered with
its IMEI-number (thats like the MAC on an ethernet card). So theoretically
you simply enter them and make them useless for the thief. 

But its too much work for the telcos, so they tell you they cannot, their
computer systems are down, or the list is overcrowded and no more entries
can be made (there was a discussion on .de usenet some year ago, IIRC, and
they stated that the list indeed was very big and no-one really cared for
that), etc etc.

It is simply some work, that they don't get paid for, have some personnel
that is not trained for other tasks then saying: Ok, I'll send you some
prospects...
So there are some insurance companies offering policies, but we all know
the attitude of insurance...

Bottom line: The telco does not want it, because it is work, and they don't
make money with it.
It would be technically able to enter the _individual number_ of a cell
phone into a database (which already exists), rendering stolen cell phones
useless immediately. They will be simply denied upon log-in to the tower.

Regards
Olaf Hoyer
----
Olaf Hoyer   www.nightfire.demailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD- Turning PC's into workstations   ICQ:22838075

Liebe und Hass sind nicht blind, aber geblendet vom Feuer,
dass sie selber mit sich tragen. (Nietzsche)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: How hard would it be...

2000-04-09 Thread Olaf Hoyer

At 19:28 09.04.00 -0600, you wrote:
... to get FreeBSD to boot off a BSD partition that wasn't labeled as
0xa5?  I'm looking for a way to create a disk that a certain picky
BIOS will like and boot off of, and I think I have to create it with a
certain ID and then it will be happy.  I suspect that it involves
hacking the boot blocks, the boot loader and the kernel's idea of the
BSD partition number in disk*subr.c.  Are there other things that are
needed?  I may be barking up the wrong tree in trying to get around
this BIOS's pickiness, but I thought I'd at least ask.

Yes, this is for a well-known, cheap internet device, which shall
remain nameless. I've already OPENed mine up.  a real lookER.

Hi!

Well, if we are talking about the same device, rumors went that the BIOS of
that thingie may be reprogrammed via internet.
BIOS update in that way also involve disabling IDE parts...
I don't know if that is only booting or the whole part..
Have seen some hardware rewiring on another mailing list to prevent that
mangling of BIOS.

If there is interest, let me know, and I'll look it up.

Regards
Olaf Hoyer

Olaf Hoyer   www.nightfire.demailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD- Turning PC's into workstations   ICQ:22838075

Liebe und Hass sind nicht blind, aber geblendet vom Feuer,
dass sie selber mit sich tragen. (Nietzsche)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: How hard would it be...

2000-04-09 Thread Olaf Hoyer

At 21:15 09.04.00 -0600, you wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Olaf 
Hoyer writes:
: Well, if we are talking about the same device, rumors went that the BIOS of
: that thingie may be reprogrammed via internet.

BIOS can be reporgrammed via a program that was downloaded...  But
only if you called a certain ISP.

: BIOS update in that way also involve disabling IDE parts...

No.  It doesn't.  The updated BIOS is just very picky about what it
boots.

: I don't know if that is only booting or the whole part..

Only booting.  Drives detect just fine.

: Have seen some hardware rewiring on another mailing list to prevent that
: mangling of BIOS.

Dremmel tools and heat guns were discussed to allow socked parts to be
more easily accessed.  I'm trying to avoid that.

Hi!

Well, ok-

Otherwise, roll that thing up from behind- Check out if someone can
replace/hack that BIOS?

Are there any information about the mainboard manufacturer?
There are also small programs that will read out the BIOS vendor ID and
display in clear format, if it is some remotely known one... 
(Yes, they are DOS, but work like a charm-Use them myself in field
service-may send you via Mail approx 100kb)

Regards
Olaf Hoyer


Olaf Hoyer   www.nightfire.demailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD- Turning PC's into workstations   ICQ:22838075

Liebe und Hass sind nicht blind, aber geblendet vom Feuer,
dass sie selber mit sich tragen. (Nietzsche)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



re: Is FreeBSD dead ?

2000-03-10 Thread Olaf Hoyer

At 14:15 10.03.00 -0600, you wrote:

FreeBSD won't be dead until they pry the source code from our cold dead
fingers :-)

There are a lot of hardware companies that had invested substantially in
BSD 4.3 knockoffs and Mach kernel knockoffs.  The natural upgrade path for
those development efforts is a commercialized version of FreeBSD (imho).

There are a lot of sites that are still using BSD variants that have refused
to upgrade to the more favored SYSV knockoffs, the natural upgrade path for
those is a commercialized version of FreeBSD (imho).

There are hardware vendors with very high end multi-processor configurations
with boo-quoo memory etc.  A natural upgrade path for those vendors (when they
finally give up on their own "way-behind-the-curve" unix variant) is to move
towards a commercialized version for FreeBSD (imho).  They may try Linux, but
is Linux "high-end-performance-ready"?
Hi!

Well,  there is Turbolinux, which claims to do that. Also there are some
projects in clustering. SuSe is selling some clusters already (got to see a
small version of that at Cebit)

Also, those very big installations use some kind of  special Unix spinoff,
something like IRIX, sold for specialized hardware, and paying big $$ for.

Yes, it is a big chance to get rid of the reputation as being without
support, which is very important to the industry.
Well, when you can do things yourself, then its ok (Meaning that they have
qualified personnel already). But when you can't, and especially smaller
businesses cannot, then you have to pay somebody else to do that. ANd thats
the point, then they ask what is when some problem occurs. A company like
M$ or Sun can be sued at least, at least you can point in one direction and
say: Hey, I paid money for that, and you have to fix those bugs and help me
install the OS, if somethings goes wrong.

Thats the things FreeBSD lacked a bit in the past. And if they see only
some small companies offering support on their own as consultants, they
decide otherwise.

There is a saying: Nobody ever gets blamed for choosing IBM.

Thus meaning: If you do what everybody else does, its alright. If you buy
Windows, you know about the problems with it, but as everybody uses it, its
common practice.

But if you stray from mainstream, you get hit very quick if something
hickups or even seems as it might like to hickup in the next few hours...

Regards
Olaf Hoyer

P.S:lets take this to -chat
 


Olaf Hoyer   www.nightfire.demailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD- Turning PC's into workstations   ICQ:22838075

Liebe und Hass sind nicht blind, aber geblendet vom Feuer,
dass sie selber mit sich tragen. (Nietzsche)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: scsi target mode

2000-02-14 Thread Olaf Hoyer


a. settings on the controller card (e.g.  scsi id, termination) 
b. freebsd configuration on the initiator and target PCs.
   (e.g. do we use scsi_pt.c, scsi_target.c, etc). 

here's a diagram depicting what we want to do. we're trying to setup 
a PC (PC2 below) with an adaptec controller to act as an emulated disk.
PC 1 will access the disks on PC 2. 

 __ __
|   PC1| scsi cable|PC2   scsi bus|
| adaptec 2940 | = | adaptec 2940  disk   |
|  SCSI ID=7   |   |   SCSI ID=0SCSI ID=5 |
|__|   |__|

Hi!

Well, I'd rather try (for simplification) following combo:

I won't connect the two 2940 directly.

PC1 goes via the external SCSI-connector to another (50-pin narrow
connector), that is directly hooked up to the cabling between the HDD and
the 2nd AHA 2940 in PC2.

AHA 2940(id5)--^^^--HDD
   Slot blind 
 with adapter
  |
  |
 to 2940(id7)



Those adapters are quite cheap (50 pin from ribbon cable to 50 pin slot blind)

In that combo you would bypass the AHA2940 having to act as a "router" with
his two SCSI channels, being the external connector one channel.

You only would have to worry about right bus negotiation and termination.

(Ok, if you want to do this for fun--- nuff said)

Regards
Olaf Hoyer
----
Olaf Hoyer   www.nightfire.demailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD- Turning PC's into workstations   ICQ:22838075

Liebe und Hass sind nicht blind, aber geblendet vom Feuer,
dass sie selber mit sich tragen. (Nietzsche)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message