Re: kldload ipfw, with IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT
On 29 July 2013 12:27, Karl Pielorz wrote: > > > --On 29 July 2013 13:02 +0200 Stefan Esser wrote: > > I guess you were looking for: >> >> net.inet.ip.fw.default_to_**accept="1" >> >> which is a tunable to be set in /boot/loader.conf ... >> > > Very probably - but that's at boot time :( - Is there nothing I can do at > kldload time to have the initial kldload give me a 'allow ip from any to > any' rule as it loads? (thus not affecting traffic on the machine, or more > importantly the CARP interfaces)? > > My normal way is to run the kldload in screen and manually run an allow all right afterwards e.g. kldload ipfw && ipfw ... :) ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: WinNT compatible drive tagging so that the 3rd stage can provide an accurate mapping of BIOS geometries for disks
On 8 August 2012 10:20, Volodymyr Shcherbyna wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Thanks for making FreeBSD so good OS. I would like to contribute to FreeBSD > and among high priority tasks I have found the one in the subject of this > mail (source: http://doc.ctrlaltdel.ch/freebsd/handbook/contrib.html). > > Unfortunately, I did not find any details regarding specifications of the > task as well as no information regarding accomplished progress in this > direction. Can you please share with me this info? I.e., what have been > done, what has to be done, and what are the goals? I think you may want to check the age of that handbook site, especially as the linux emulation part mentions stuff about installing on 2.1-STABLE so the issue you're asking about is probably no longer an issue in the first place. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: iso2flash img
On 21 March 2012 15:52, Mark Felder wrote: > As an alternative I recently purchased a Zalman ZM-VE200 device (there's > also a USB3.0 flavor) that lets you copy ISOs to it and it will emulate a > CDROM/DVDROM/BDROM for you so you never have to deal with this mess again. > It works amazingly well. I was tired of fighting this problem and this is an > amazing solution -- I can keep every ISO I ever need on a single drive. > > http://www.zalman.com/eng/product/Product_Read.asp?idx=431 > http://www.zalman.com/eng/product/Product_Read.asp?idx=459 > http://www.rmprepusb.com/tutorials/ve200 > > > Hope that helps someone Have to say that I have one too and have had no problems with it yet :) ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Cobalt Raq 550
On Tue, 5 May 2009 14:03:46 +0300, "Jukka Ruohonen" said: > On 05.05.2009, Simon Dick wrote: > > with them at my last job, I don't remember hearing about anyone who'd > > managed to get anything except linux working on it though (though I'm > > sure someone must have!) > > Perhaps somewhat off-topic, but: > > http://www.netbsd.org/ports/cobalt/ Unfortunately that's just the older MIPS based ones, the RaQ4 and 550 were x86 based but with a very weird BIOS (I know it'd be possible to install onto them, I just don't think anyone's thought it worthwhile yet :) ) -- Simon Dick sim...@irrelevant.org ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Cobalt Raq 550
On Fri, 1 May 2009 08:48:09 -0700, "Justin G." said: > Hello Hackers, > > We came into a Cobalt Raq 550 the other day and were wondering if we > could put it to use. I've googled and googled and found only guides > for Linux installs. Much of it is quite similar, but my issue is with > the loader on the device being able to boot into FreeBSD. The device > searches for linux kernel images when booting. > > Does anyone have any experience with installing FreeBSD on a Raq 550? > I wasn't able to find a website with much detail and would appreciate > any hints or leads :-) Doesn't the RaQ 550 have a basic Linux kernel in it's flash? I worked with them at my last job, I don't remember hearing about anyone who'd managed to get anything except linux working on it though (though I'm sure someone must have!) -- Simon Dick sim...@irrelevant.org ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: USB serial support on FreeBSD 3.5?
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 23:36, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Les Biffle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : I need two serial ports on a modern server running our 3.5-based firewall > : code, but the 1U servers I find have only one serial port. I need one > : for console and one for our dongle, and wondered if there was stable > : USB serial adaptor support in 3.5? Would my dongle code (that assumes > : a "normal" serial port) have trouble accessing a serial dongle by way > : of USB? > > I've been using the new umct driver with the Belkin 109 > dongle. It works well for me for data collection and some minor > DTR/DSR frobbing. Well enought that I a program I wrote for the > Newton Keyboard + sio (and SunOS 4/5) works unaltered. For me the uftdi driver works nicely under -current using 20 ukp serial adaptor I found: ucom0: FTDI US232B, rev 1.10/4.00, addr 2 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: New scsi_target code
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 11:41:52AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju > > lian Elischer writes: > > > > > > > > >On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > >> > > >> IP-over-SCSI ? > > >> > > > > > >Well I've just been reading about SCSI over IP so > > > > That's different. IP-over-SCSI is a much wanted Myrinet-light over here. > > I am not aware of a spec for IP-over-SCSI. Wouldn't it have to use things > like AEN to send data in the reverse direction? > > Of course, the various transports like FC define IP layers but they are > usually peers with the SCSI layer. > > If people are talking about iSCSI, this driver could also support that > given that the iSCSI HBA was hooked into the CAM SIM layer. Try rfc 2143 :) -- Simon Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: SSE bcopy
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:42:42AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Denis Serenyi writes: > > I've been looking at adding an SSE bcopy that runs at user-level to a > > program that I'm working on. I'm using FreeBSD 4.3 currently. > > > > I wrote the routine, and when I execute it, I get an illegal instruction > > exception when I try to execute the first SSE instruction (movups). > > > > After searching the hackers archives, I'm guessing that this is because > > FreeBSD 4.3 does not execute the instructions at boot time to enable SSE > > instructions to be executed, and also because FreeBSD 4.3 does not save > > the 128-bit SIMD registers on context switches. > > > > Am I correct in this assessment? > > > > It also seems like this support has been added to FreeBSD 4.5. Is this > > correct? > > > > Assuming yes, in what release was SSE support added to FreeBSD? Has > > anyone done a patch that can be applied to FreeBSD 4.3, or are the > > changes non-trivial? > > > > As David says, have a look at > http://kobe1995.net/~kaz/FreeBSD/SSE.en.html There is a patch there > for 4.3. > > What are the performance implications to an SSE bcopy? How much > faster is it than a normal bcopy? > > Would you consider releasing your code under a BSD license so that > others could play with it, and possibly integrate it (or something > based on it) into FreeBSD? Also if he wants to check if OS SSE support is enabled, he can check if the hw.instruction_sse sysctl is set to 1, then he'll know if it's safe to use :) -- Simon Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: FreeBSD Floppy driver needs enhancement...
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:32:43PM -0500, Randell Jesup wrote: > Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Randell Jesup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Back to the original question: do people care about floppies and > bad-sector recovery anymore? Aren't floppies on the very verge of > disappearing for good, replaced by CDRW's? My floppies will be vanishing entirely, after I've finished copying all my Amiga floppies onto HD as adf files (of course, there's the problem that loads are corrupt by now, but most still work much to my surprise!). -- Simon Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Why do I get this urge to go bowling everytime I see Tux?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Adding support for Duxbury PCI modem to FreeBSD 4.4
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:47:59AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Simon Dick writes: > : Please don't remove the SurfRider one: > : sio0: port 0xa400-0xa407 irq 12 at device 10.0 on >pci0 > : sio0: moving to sio2 > : sio2: type 16550A > : > : It was me who submitted the ID for it, it's my main modem :) > > Wow! Cool. I didn't think that there were others. Do you know if > this is a "kermit" chipset or not? Is there a Lucent part on the card > with the word "kermit" on it (well, newer versions don't have kermit > on them). I didn't see any, here's what's on the various chips on it if this helps: 1) TOPIC TP560i 9935S14 D7S82.1 2) (my guess is a mem chip) HMC HM62H256DJ-12 9815A D84B1 3) The biggest chip on the board EON EN29F002NT -70P 0021 > I won't remove it. I was just surprised to find another one with the > plethera of winmodems. Cool. So was I, I just found it advertised as Linux compatible and took a gamble :) -- Simon Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Why do I get this urge to go bowling everytime I see Tux?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Adding support for Duxbury PCI modem to FreeBSD 4.4
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:05:21AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matthew >Emmerton writes: > : On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Peter van Heusden wrote: > : > : > On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 09:35:58AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > : > > In message ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Peter van >Heusden" writes: > : > > : > I'm having a look at the Linux 2.4 kernel code, since they apparently > : > have winmodem support (including for the SM56 chipset, which is now > : > no longer supported by Motorola - double Aaaargh!), but will probably > : > have to go with an external modem, since it seems to be impossible to > : > get internal PCI non-winmodems. > : > : 3Com makes a PCI "hardware" (non-Winmodem) modem. > > I've seen only 3 hardware pci modems. All are based on the lucent > "kermit" chipset, but 3com PCI FaxModems have their own id. > > Well, I take that back. There's at least one pccard based pci modem. > There is a PLX part that glues the pccard bus to the pci ala some of > the wi adapters. And there's an old modem chipset on the card. These > were made out of surplus parts and I never saw them in real channels > (and to be honest, only consulted in writing a driver at the high > level for them, I've not put one in a machine or had one in hand). > > I'm not sure that the SurfRider that's listed in the driver really is > a hardware modem. All the other cards should likely be moved to my > puc bridge driver, but until I have that working, it is best to leave > things alone. :-) One problem with sio is that you can't have > different clock chip rates than the default. Some multiport boards > have faster xtals that allow higher data rates :-(. Please don't remove the SurfRider one: sio0: port 0xa400-0xa407 irq 12 at device 10.0 on pci0 sio0: moving to sio2 sio2: type 16550A It was me who submitted the ID for it, it's my main modem :) -- Simon Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Why do I get this urge to go bowling everytime I see Tux?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
