Re: firefox flash plug in woes

2008-01-25 Thread icantthinkofone

Tim Clewlow wrote:

--- KAYVEN  RIESE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

i have been told that freeBSD does not go well with
flash plugins for browsers, which is quite a ubiquitous
technology in websites.  is there any progress on this?
i have freeBSD 6.2-STABLE and gnome desktop




Hi there, I have native firefox with flash 7 working fine on FreeBSD 6.2, with
java and adobe reader. Note I always install via ports, and they are up to
date.  Anyway, here is how, you can try it from packages, ie pkg_add -r x -
hopefully that works too, but if it doesnt then installing from ports
definately does.

[ Note, I just copies/pasted this from my notes, there may be later versions of
these packages you can also use - but IIRC I had some problems with them ]

install www/firefox   
install print/acroread7   
install java/diablo-jdk15
install www/linux-flashplugin7   
kldload linux
echo none/compat/linux/proc  linprocfs   rw  0  
0  /etc/fstab

mount -a
echo linux_enable=\YES\  /etc/rc.conf   
nspluginwrapper -v -a -i


Cheers, Tim.

We are BSD ... resistance is futile.
http://www.freebsd.org/ - http://www.openbsd.org/ - http://www.netbsd.org/


  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  

This is what I do and I run flash just fine, too.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Any hope to have things requested by NVidia in FreeBSD-7?

2007-11-16 Thread icantthinkofone

Yuri wrote:

I read long time ago that the reason that NVidia can't have their driver on
64-bit platform is that FreeBSD kernel lacks some functionality.

Is this functionality present in 7.0? Or when to expect this to be done?

I have NVidia card but still run 32-bit system because of lack of driver.

Yuri
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
You are correct and, no, this functionality will not be available on 
7.0, though someone is working on the problem.

___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD cache memory allocation

2007-11-14 Thread icantthinkofone

On Wednesday 14 November 2007 11:11:41 am Rob Belics wrote:
  Someone I can't stand said this about FreeBSD.  Though I know C, I 
don't
  know anything about this and would love to respond. My first 
thought was

  'contigmalloc' but I'm not sure it's equivalent.
  [QUOTE]The kernel is really lacking some features. They need a 
method to
  set precise type of memory cache but BSD doesn't provide way to 
specify

  memory cache.
 
  For that reason MS has the beautiful
  MmAllocateContigousMemorySpecifyCache()[/QUOTE]

For kernel memory on i386 and amd64 in 6.3 and later you can use
pmap_change_attr() to adjust the caching mode of memory after you have
allocated it.   It is best used only with allocations that are a 
multiple of

the page size.

-- John Baldwin

I posted using the wrong email address above.

Apparently the person I was referring to was probably talking about he 
nvidia issue and I see you, John, are working on that pmap function.  
One question I have is whether nvidia got themselves into a bind (for 
lack of a better word) because they wrote their drive using Windows 
functions but now want FreeBSD to create kernel functions just like 
Windows rather than rewriting their own code.  Or is all this truly a 
lacking feature in FreeBSD?

___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]