Re: General lameness regarding exec()
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Michael Bacarella wrote: > > I patch my systems to log exec() calls because I think it's useful, but I > really don't know how to go about making it a general contribution. > > Anyone like this idea? Any Suggestions for how I should really implement > it? Have a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/~abial/spy/README Andrzej Bialecki // <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WebGiro AB, Sweden (http://www.webgiro.com) // --- // -- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve. http://www.freebsd.org // --- Small & Embedded FreeBSD: http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
General lameness regarding exec()
I patch my systems to log exec() calls because I think it's useful, but I really don't know how to go about making it a general contribution. Anyone like this idea? Any Suggestions for how I should really implement it? I basically have it end up in syslog, along with who called it and what their credentials were. This is in contrast to process accounting, which only records information on processes which have terminated. /* -- Michael Bacarella( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) | (212) 293-2620 Administration / Development / Support | http://nyct.net/ [ N e w Y o r k C o n n e c t . N E T ] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bringing New York The Internet Service It Deserves! - */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
