Re: Network Throughput between jail and base system
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 12:13:04AM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote: Greetings, Ilias Marinos wrote: Hello all, I have a jail to my FreeBSD-STABLE, in which I run some uname -a will be more helpful then FreeBSD-STABLE. services.I have configured and setup this jail using ezjail-admin. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ jls JID IP Address Hostname Path 1 192.168.1.100 ws/usr/jails/ws /usr/jails/ws #Jails ezjail_enable=YES ifconfig_lo1=192.168.1.100 netmask 0x # Jail iface I use lo1 as jail interface and I nat internet traffic to it with pf: nat on $ext_if from $ws to any - ($ext_if) Today I 've tried to scp a big directory inside the jail and I've noticed that I was secure copying with 2-3MB/s .That sounds too weird for me and I would like to hear some opinions , for what it may be the problem. You should investigate where the bottle-neck is. It's probably not in the network protocol. Most probably it is limitation of your CPU or your HDD(s). I think (not sure) jail have default limit to % of the CPU resources, so if you encrypt the stream most probably the limitation is in the CPU. You can check http://wiki.freebsd.org/JailResourceLimits for more information. Based upon that wiki page I'm led to believe that this is not in any branch of FreeBSD yet. That is, it's not in CVS. -- WXS ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Throughput between jail and base system
Hello all, I have a jail to my FreeBSD-STABLE, in which I run some services.I have configured and setup this jail using ezjail-admin. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ jls JID IP Address Hostname Path 1 192.168.1.100 ws/usr/jails/ws /usr/jails/ws #Jails ezjail_enable=YES ifconfig_lo1=192.168.1.100 netmask 0x # Jail iface I use lo1 as jail interface and I nat internet traffic to it with pf: nat on $ext_if from $ws to any - ($ext_if) Today I 've tried to scp a big directory inside the jail and I've noticed that I was secure copying with 2-3MB/s .That sounds too weird for me and I would like to hear some opinions , for what it may be the problem. Thanks a lot, Ilias Marinos -- echo Sysadmin know better bash than english. | sed s/min/mins/ \ | sed 's/better bash/bash better/' ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Network Throughput between jail and base system
Greetings, Ilias Marinos wrote: Hello all, I have a jail to my FreeBSD-STABLE, in which I run some uname -a will be more helpful then FreeBSD-STABLE. services.I have configured and setup this jail using ezjail-admin. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ jls JID IP Address Hostname Path 1 192.168.1.100 ws /usr/jails/ws /usr/jails/ws #Jails ezjail_enable=YES ifconfig_lo1=192.168.1.100 netmask 0x # Jail iface I use lo1 as jail interface and I nat internet traffic to it with pf: nat on $ext_if from $ws to any - ($ext_if) Today I 've tried to scp a big directory inside the jail and I've noticed that I was secure copying with 2-3MB/s .That sounds too weird for me and I would like to hear some opinions , for what it may be the problem. You should investigate where the bottle-neck is. It's probably not in the network protocol. Most probably it is limitation of your CPU or your HDD(s). I think (not sure) jail have default limit to % of the CPU resources, so if you encrypt the stream most probably the limitation is in the CPU. You can check http://wiki.freebsd.org/JailResourceLimits for more information. Thanks a lot, Ilias Marinos -- echo Sysadmin know better bash than english. | sed s/min/mins/ \ | sed 's/better bash/bash better/' ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
