Re: L440GX+ Server Board
Hi list, My problem is solved. Since I changed my SCSI to a Quantum, I haven't have more problem with performance. I recompiled the pwd_mkdb.c program using more RAM memory and the performance became better. Before compilation the "delete user" operation takes 3 minutes, and now the same operation takes 11 seconds (whe have about 12000 usernames - thanks Pedro Vazquez ;). []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > Hi list, > > I can't solve the problem yet. > > When I runnig the dmesg command, I have: > > --- > da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabled > da0: 8683MB (17783240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) > da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da1: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabled > da1: 8683MB (17783240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) > --- > > I did a test, changing only the SCSI disk, using the same motherboard > (L440GX+). I ran the dmesg command again and I received: > > -- > da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabled > da0: 8683MB (17783250 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) > -- > > > I realized that the quantum disk have a 80.000MB/s transfers. > Does someone use a SEAGATE ST39140LW disk and have I/O problems? > > Regards, > Luiz Morte. > > PS: > Someone told me that vipw doens't have much I/O disk, but when I run it > with 12000 accounts, my disk have a lot off access. > > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100, > > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but when > I > > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance of > > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine to > > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the server > > stays "ok" again. > > > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > > > I appreciate any help. > > []s, > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
|o|... Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 10:16:30AM -0300, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior ...|o| wrote: > > Hi list, > > I can't solve the problem yet. > > When I runnig the dmesg command, I have: > > --- > da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabled > da0: 8683MB (17783240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) > da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da1: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabled > da1: 8683MB (17783240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) > --- > > I did a test, changing only the SCSI disk, using the same motherboard > (L440GX+). I ran the dmesg command again and I received: > > -- > da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabled > da0: 8683MB (17783250 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) > -- > > > I realized that the quantum disk have a 80.000MB/s transfers. > Does someone use a SEAGATE ST39140LW disk and have I/O problems? > > Regards, > Luiz Morte. > > PS: > Someone told me that vipw doens't have much I/O disk, but when I run it > with 12000 accounts, my disk have a lot off access. da uma olhada se ele nao ta paginando, a geracao do dbm novo e' rapida se vc disser para ele fazer tudo em ram, senao ele faz em disco O pwd_mkdb tem esta opcao para evitar isso: -s cachesize Specify in megabytes the size of the memory cache used by the hash- ing library. On systems with a large user base, a small cache size can lead to prohibitively long database file rebuild times. As a rough guide, the memory usage of pwd_mkdb in megabytes will be a little bit more than twice the figure specified here. The default is 2 megabytes. poe ai 16M e testa pra ver, o vipw que chama ele nao tem, vc pode recompilar o pwd_mkdb c/ um default de 16M se for o caso > > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100, > > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but when > I > > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance of > > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine to > > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the server > > stays "ok" again. > > > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > > > I appreciate any help. > > []s, > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message -- .sig: license expired, contact your vendor To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
|o|... Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 10:16:30AM -0300, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior ...|o| wrote: > > Hi list, > > I can't solve the problem yet. > > When I runnig the dmesg command, I have: > > --- > da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabled > da0: 8683MB (17783240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) > da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da1: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabled > da1: 8683MB (17783240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) > --- > > I did a test, changing only the SCSI disk, using the same motherboard > (L440GX+). I ran the dmesg command again and I received: > > -- > da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabled > da0: 8683MB (17783250 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) > -- > > > I realized that the quantum disk have a 80.000MB/s transfers. > Does someone use a SEAGATE ST39140LW disk and have I/O problems? > > Regards, > Luiz Morte. > > PS: > Someone told me that vipw doens't have much I/O disk, but when I run it > with 12000 accounts, my disk have a lot off access. da uma olhada se ele nao ta paginando, a geracao do dbm novo e' rapida se vc disser para ele fazer tudo em ram, senao ele faz em disco O pwd_mkdb tem esta opcao para evitar isso: -s cachesize Specify in megabytes the size of the memory cache used by the hash- ing library. On systems with a large user base, a small cache size can lead to prohibitively long database file rebuild times. As a rough guide, the memory usage of pwd_mkdb in megabytes will be a little bit more than twice the figure specified here. The default is 2 megabytes. poe ai 16M e testa pra ver, o vipw que chama ele nao tem, vc pode recompilar o pwd_mkdb c/ um default de 16M se for o caso > > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100, > > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but when > I > > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance of > > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine to > > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the server > > stays "ok" again. > > > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > > > I appreciate any help. > > []s, > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message -- .sig: license expired, contact your vendor To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a > > > asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) > > > > I think that I don't have problem with my NIC (Intel 10/100). > > The bus that the onboard NIC is on probably gets probed later then > then the expansion bus. I'm using only the onboard NIC. I didn't add any other NIC in my server. []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Pete Mckenna wrote: ... > > > I have also put an adaptec 2940 in them and it works as well. > > > > What is the adaptec transfer rate? I have tested with a adaptec 80Mb, and > > it didn't work too. The chipset is the same the AIC 7896. > > I'm not sure what you are asking. I havn't put an Adaptec 7896 into this > motherboard, just added a 2940 to the built in 7896 and didn't have any > problems. We use LVD drives on the A or 0 channel and they need external > termination. I don't have transfer rate numbers handy but could generate > some if that's what your asking ? Ok. I try to explain again. The L440GX+ Server board has a AIC 7896 onboard (I haven't put), whith 2 SCSI interfaces: one with 80Mb transfer rate and one with 40Mb. I have 2 SCSI disk (with 80Mb transfer rate) and did the following tests: . I put the SCSI disk in 80Mb interface; . I put the SCSI disk in 40Mb interface; . I added a 2940 (with 80Mb transfer rate) and I put the disck SCSI. All tests didn't work, so my server stays very slow. > > Another test that I have done with my kernel was to put the flags below: > > This only refers to IDE drives not SCSI drives. We don't use anything > other than SCSI in these boxes. Which are you using ? > > > > controller wdc0at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 > > diskwd0 at wdc0 drive 0 flags 0xb0ff > > diskwd1 at wdc0 drive 1 flags 0xb0ff > > controller wdc1at isa? port "IO_WD2" bio irq 15 > > diskwd2 at wdc1 drive 0 flags 0xb0ff > > diskwd3 at wdc1 drive 1 flags 0xb0ff Ok. I don't use IDE disk. What is your BIOS and BMC firmware version? I called to Intel support and they told me that my version BIOS is out of date. I have to upgrade to 1.05 (BMC firmware) and 7.3 (BIOS). Could it be this my problem? Thanks. []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a > > > asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) > > > > I think that I don't have problem with my NIC (Intel 10/100). > > The bus that the onboard NIC is on probably gets probed later then > then the expansion bus. I'm using only the onboard NIC. I didn't add any other NIC in my server. []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Pete Mckenna wrote: ... > > > I have also put an adaptec 2940 in them and it works as well. > > > > What is the adaptec transfer rate? I have tested with a adaptec 80Mb, and > > it didn't work too. The chipset is the same the AIC 7896. > > I'm not sure what you are asking. I havn't put an Adaptec 7896 into this > motherboard, just added a 2940 to the built in 7896 and didn't have any > problems. We use LVD drives on the A or 0 channel and they need external > termination. I don't have transfer rate numbers handy but could generate > some if that's what your asking ? Ok. I try to explain again. The L440GX+ Server board has a AIC 7896 onboard (I haven't put), whith 2 SCSI interfaces: one with 80Mb transfer rate and one with 40Mb. I have 2 SCSI disk (with 80Mb transfer rate) and did the following tests: . I put the SCSI disk in 80Mb interface; . I put the SCSI disk in 40Mb interface; . I added a 2940 (with 80Mb transfer rate) and I put the disck SCSI. All tests didn't work, so my server stays very slow. > > Another test that I have done with my kernel was to put the flags below: > > This only refers to IDE drives not SCSI drives. We don't use anything > other than SCSI in these boxes. Which are you using ? > > > > controller wdc0at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 > > diskwd0 at wdc0 drive 0 flags 0xb0ff > > diskwd1 at wdc0 drive 1 flags 0xb0ff > > controller wdc1at isa? port "IO_WD2" bio irq 15 > > diskwd2 at wdc1 drive 0 flags 0xb0ff > > diskwd3 at wdc1 drive 1 flags 0xb0ff Ok. I don't use IDE disk. What is your BIOS and BMC firmware version? I called to Intel support and they told me that my version BIOS is out of date. I have to upgrade to 1.05 (BMC firmware) and 7.3 (BIOS). Could it be this my problem? Thanks. []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > Hi Pete and All, > > On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Pete Mckenna wrote: > > > We have a few dozen running mostly as uniprocesser boxes. > > Ok. My server has 2 processors. I supose that you have some servers with 2 > processors. I think just one that I used to determine it would work. > > > I have also put an adaptec 2940 in them and it works as well. > > What is the adaptec transfer rate? I have tested with a adaptec 80Mb, and > it didn't work too. The chipset is the same the AIC 7896. I'm not sure what you are asking. I havn't put an Adaptec 7896 into this motherboard, just added a 2940 to the built in 7896 and didn't have any problems. We use LVD drives on the A or 0 channel and they need external termination. I don't have transfer rate numbers handy but could generate some if that's what your asking ? > > > You need to run 3.2 or better to get the drivers for the on board > > Adaptec. > > I have downloaded (with CVSup) to stable version, but I have the same > problem. I have about 10.000 users in my master.passwd. When I runnig the > vipw, my machine stay down (I can't send any e-mail, when I have the > problem). > > Another test that I have done with my kernel was to put the flags below: This only refers to IDE drives not SCSI drives. We don't use anything other than SCSI in these boxes. Which are you using ? > > controller wdc0at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 > diskwd0 at wdc0 drive 0 flags 0xb0ff > diskwd1 at wdc0 drive 1 flags 0xb0ff > controller wdc1at isa? port "IO_WD2" bio irq 15 > diskwd2 at wdc1 drive 0 flags 0xb0ff > diskwd3 at wdc1 drive 1 flags 0xb0ff > > It didn't work too. > > > The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a > > asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) > > I think that I don't have problem with my NIC (Intel 10/100). > > > We like them, and are trying to get Intel to make the reporting of temp > > etc and power managment Unix friendly. You can get to the bios at boot > > time (remotely via a com port) as it is which is nice. > > I can't figured out what you want to say about BIOS :/ These board have some remote managment capabilities that let you see the early ( pre -FreeBSD ) boot stuff like ram count, acess to the bois, and the Adaptec bios. etc Pete > > Thanks in advance. > > []s, > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > Pete > > > > Kevin Lynn wrote: > > > > > > Has anyone else gotten this server board to work? > > > > > > I've got an N440BX and have been considering getting the L440GX+ but > > > haven't because I don't know if it works.. > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > > > About the problem bellow, I bought a 2940 Adaptec Ultra2 Wide SCSI > > > > controller, but it didn't work too. > > > > > > > > I wrote to Justin T. Gibbs and he told me that my problem is not SCSI. > > > > > > > > Somebody has any idea? > > > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > > > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > > > > > > > > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card > > > > > 10/100, > > > > > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > > > > > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > > > > > > > > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but > > > > > when I > > > > > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance > > > > > of > > > > > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine > > > > > to > > > > > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the > > > > > server > > > > > stays "ok" again. > > > > > > > > > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > > > > > > > > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > > > > > > > > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > > > > > > > > > I appreciate any help. > > > > > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > > > > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > > > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junio
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > Hi Pete and All, > > On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Pete Mckenna wrote: > > > We have a few dozen running mostly as uniprocesser boxes. > > Ok. My server has 2 processors. I supose that you have some servers with 2 > processors. I think just one that I used to determine it would work. > > > I have also put an adaptec 2940 in them and it works as well. > > What is the adaptec transfer rate? I have tested with a adaptec 80Mb, and > it didn't work too. The chipset is the same the AIC 7896. I'm not sure what you are asking. I havn't put an Adaptec 7896 into this motherboard, just added a 2940 to the built in 7896 and didn't have any problems. We use LVD drives on the A or 0 channel and they need external termination. I don't have transfer rate numbers handy but could generate some if that's what your asking ? > > > You need to run 3.2 or better to get the drivers for the on board > > Adaptec. > > I have downloaded (with CVSup) to stable version, but I have the same > problem. I have about 10.000 users in my master.passwd. When I runnig the > vipw, my machine stay down (I can't send any e-mail, when I have the > problem). > > Another test that I have done with my kernel was to put the flags below: This only refers to IDE drives not SCSI drives. We don't use anything other than SCSI in these boxes. Which are you using ? > > controller wdc0at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 > diskwd0 at wdc0 drive 0 flags 0xb0ff > diskwd1 at wdc0 drive 1 flags 0xb0ff > controller wdc1at isa? port "IO_WD2" bio irq 15 > diskwd2 at wdc1 drive 0 flags 0xb0ff > diskwd3 at wdc1 drive 1 flags 0xb0ff > > It didn't work too. > > > The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a > > asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) > > I think that I don't have problem with my NIC (Intel 10/100). > > > We like them, and are trying to get Intel to make the reporting of temp > > etc and power managment Unix friendly. You can get to the bios at boot > > time (remotely via a com port) as it is which is nice. > > I can't figured out what you want to say about BIOS :/ These board have some remote managment capabilities that let you see the early ( pre -FreeBSD ) boot stuff like ram count, acess to the bois, and the Adaptec bios. etc Pete > > Thanks in advance. > > []s, > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > Pete > > > > Kevin Lynn wrote: > > > > > > Has anyone else gotten this server board to work? > > > > > > I've got an N440BX and have been considering getting the L440GX+ but > > > haven't because I don't know if it works.. > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > > > About the problem bellow, I bought a 2940 Adaptec Ultra2 Wide SCSI > > > > controller, but it didn't work too. > > > > > > > > I wrote to Justin T. Gibbs and he told me that my problem is not SCSI. > > > > > > > > Somebody has any idea? > > > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > > > > > > > > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100, > > > > > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > > > > > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > > > > > > > > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but when I > > > > > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance of > > > > > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine to > > > > > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the server > > > > > stays "ok" again. > > > > > > > > > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > > > > > > > > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > > > > > > > > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > > > > > > > > > I appreciate any help. > > > > > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > > > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a > > asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) > > I think that I don't have problem with my NIC (Intel 10/100). The bus that the onboard NIC is on probably gets probed later then then the expansion bus. -- - bill fumerola - bi...@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfume...@computerhorizons.com - bi...@freebsd.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
Hi Pete and All, On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Pete Mckenna wrote: > We have a few dozen running mostly as uniprocesser boxes. Ok. My server has 2 processors. I supose that you have some servers with 2 processors. > I have also put an adaptec 2940 in them and it works as well. What is the adaptec transfer rate? I have tested with a adaptec 80Mb, and it didn't work too. The chipset is the same the AIC 7896. > You need to run 3.2 or better to get the drivers for the on board > Adaptec. I have downloaded (with CVSup) to stable version, but I have the same problem. I have about 10.000 users in my master.passwd. When I runnig the vipw, my machine stay down (I can't send any e-mail, when I have the problem). Another test that I have done with my kernel was to put the flags below: controller wdc0at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 diskwd0 at wdc0 drive 0 flags 0xb0ff diskwd1 at wdc0 drive 1 flags 0xb0ff controller wdc1at isa? port "IO_WD2" bio irq 15 diskwd2 at wdc1 drive 0 flags 0xb0ff diskwd3 at wdc1 drive 1 flags 0xb0ff It didn't work too. > The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a > asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) I think that I don't have problem with my NIC (Intel 10/100). > We like them, and are trying to get Intel to make the reporting of temp > etc and power managment Unix friendly. You can get to the bios at boot > time (remotely via a com port) as it is which is nice. I can't figured out what you want to say about BIOS :/ Thanks in advance. []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > Pete > > Kevin Lynn wrote: > > > > Has anyone else gotten this server board to work? > > > > I've got an N440BX and have been considering getting the L440GX+ but > > haven't because I don't know if it works.. > > > > Kevin > > > > On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > About the problem bellow, I bought a 2940 Adaptec Ultra2 Wide SCSI > > > controller, but it didn't work too. > > > > > > I wrote to Justin T. Gibbs and he told me that my problem is not SCSI. > > > > > > Somebody has any idea? > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > > > > > > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100, > > > > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > > > > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > > > > > > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but when > > > > I > > > > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance of > > > > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine to > > > > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the server > > > > stays "ok" again. > > > > > > > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > > > > > > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > > > > > > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > > > > > > > I appreciate any help. > > > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > > > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a > > asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) > > I think that I don't have problem with my NIC (Intel 10/100). The bus that the onboard NIC is on probably gets probed later then then the expansion bus. -- - bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
We have a few dozen running mostly as uniprocesser boxes. I have also put an adaptec 2940 in them and it works as well. You need to run 3.2 or better to get the drivers for the on board Adaptec. The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) We like them, and are trying to get Intel to make the reporting of temp etc and power managment Unix friendly. You can get to the bios at boot time (remotely via a com port) as it is which is nice. Pete Kevin Lynn wrote: > > Has anyone else gotten this server board to work? > > I've got an N440BX and have been considering getting the L440GX+ but > haven't because I don't know if it works.. > > Kevin > > On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > Hi list, > > > > About the problem bellow, I bought a 2940 Adaptec Ultra2 Wide SCSI > > controller, but it didn't work too. > > > > I wrote to Justin T. Gibbs and he told me that my problem is not SCSI. > > > > Somebody has any idea? > > > > []s, > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > > > > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100, > > > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > > > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > > > > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but when I > > > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance of > > > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine to > > > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the server > > > stays "ok" again. > > > > > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > > > > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > > > > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > > > > > I appreciate any help. > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > []s, > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
Hi Pete and All, On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Pete Mckenna wrote: > We have a few dozen running mostly as uniprocesser boxes. Ok. My server has 2 processors. I supose that you have some servers with 2 processors. > I have also put an adaptec 2940 in them and it works as well. What is the adaptec transfer rate? I have tested with a adaptec 80Mb, and it didn't work too. The chipset is the same the AIC 7896. > You need to run 3.2 or better to get the drivers for the on board > Adaptec. I have downloaded (with CVSup) to stable version, but I have the same problem. I have about 10.000 users in my master.passwd. When I runnig the vipw, my machine stay down (I can't send any e-mail, when I have the problem). Another test that I have done with my kernel was to put the flags below: controller wdc0at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 diskwd0 at wdc0 drive 0 flags 0xb0ff diskwd1 at wdc0 drive 1 flags 0xb0ff controller wdc1at isa? port "IO_WD2" bio irq 15 diskwd2 at wdc1 drive 0 flags 0xb0ff diskwd3 at wdc1 drive 1 flags 0xb0ff It didn't work too. > The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a > asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) I think that I don't have problem with my NIC (Intel 10/100). > We like them, and are trying to get Intel to make the reporting of temp > etc and power managment Unix friendly. You can get to the bios at boot > time (remotely via a com port) as it is which is nice. I can't figured out what you want to say about BIOS :/ Thanks in advance. []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > Pete > > Kevin Lynn wrote: > > > > Has anyone else gotten this server board to work? > > > > I've got an N440BX and have been considering getting the L440GX+ but > > haven't because I don't know if it works.. > > > > Kevin > > > > On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > About the problem bellow, I bought a 2940 Adaptec Ultra2 Wide SCSI > > > controller, but it didn't work too. > > > > > > I wrote to Justin T. Gibbs and he told me that my problem is not SCSI. > > > > > > Somebody has any idea? > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > > > > > > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100, > > > > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > > > > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > > > > > > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but when I > > > > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance of > > > > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine to > > > > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the server > > > > stays "ok" again. > > > > > > > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > > > > > > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > > > > > > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > > > > > > > I appreciate any help. > > > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
We have a few dozen running mostly as uniprocesser boxes. I have also put an adaptec 2940 in them and it works as well. You need to run 3.2 or better to get the drivers for the on board Adaptec. The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) We like them, and are trying to get Intel to make the reporting of temp etc and power managment Unix friendly. You can get to the bios at boot time (remotely via a com port) as it is which is nice. Pete Kevin Lynn wrote: > > Has anyone else gotten this server board to work? > > I've got an N440BX and have been considering getting the L440GX+ but > haven't because I don't know if it works.. > > Kevin > > On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > Hi list, > > > > About the problem bellow, I bought a 2940 Adaptec Ultra2 Wide SCSI > > controller, but it didn't work too. > > > > I wrote to Justin T. Gibbs and he told me that my problem is not SCSI. > > > > Somebody has any idea? > > > > []s, > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > > > > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100, > > > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > > > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > > > > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but when I > > > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance of > > > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine to > > > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the server > > > stays "ok" again. > > > > > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > > > > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > > > > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > > > > > I appreciate any help. > > > > > > []s, > > > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > []s, > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
Has anyone else gotten this server board to work? I've got an N440BX and have been considering getting the L440GX+ but haven't because I don't know if it works.. Kevin On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > Hi list, > > About the problem bellow, I bought a 2940 Adaptec Ultra2 Wide SCSI > controller, but it didn't work too. > > I wrote to Justin T. Gibbs and he told me that my problem is not SCSI. > > Somebody has any idea? > > []s, > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100, > > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but when I > > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance of > > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine to > > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the server > > stays "ok" again. > > > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > > > I appreciate any help. > > > > []s, > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > []s, > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
Has anyone else gotten this server board to work? I've got an N440BX and have been considering getting the L440GX+ but haven't because I don't know if it works.. Kevin On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > Hi list, > > About the problem bellow, I bought a 2940 Adaptec Ultra2 Wide SCSI > controller, but it didn't work too. > > I wrote to Justin T. Gibbs and he told me that my problem is not SCSI. > > Somebody has any idea? > > []s, > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100, > > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but when I > > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance of > > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine to > > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the server > > stays "ok" again. > > > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > > > I appreciate any help. > > > > []s, > > > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > []s, > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
Hi list, About the problem bellow, I bought a 2940 Adaptec Ultra2 Wide SCSI controller, but it didn't work too. I wrote to Justin T. Gibbs and he told me that my problem is not SCSI. Somebody has any idea? []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100, > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but when I > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance of > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine to > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the server > stays "ok" again. > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > I appreciate any help. > > []s, > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: mo...@correionet.com.br Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: L440GX+ Server Board
Hi list, About the problem bellow, I bought a 2940 Adaptec Ultra2 Wide SCSI controller, but it didn't work too. I wrote to Justin T. Gibbs and he told me that my problem is not SCSI. Somebody has any idea? []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2. > > My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100, > SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III > 450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard. > > I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and it worked. The server is ok, but when I > run a comand with disk access (whith vipw or mysql), the performance of > server goes down. My server stays very very very slow. If I use pine to > read my messages, it doesn't work. When the comand finishes, the server > stays "ok" again. > > I recompiled the kernel with "maxusers 128", but it doesn't work. > > My SCSI cable has a terminator and the scsi setup is ok (I think :) ). > > The dmesg command output is in attchmnt. > > I appreciate any help. > > []s, > > Luiz Morte da Costa Junior > Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 > CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil > []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de RedesE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefone: +55 19 754-2532Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
