List complaint (Was: Re: ipfw1sysctl and lifetime)
Someone really needs to remove this guy from the list (or at least give him an official warning of some kind). His repeated warnings on the list has not done anything to his conduct nor has it caused him to stop his childish antics. All he is doing is polluting the list archives. In the 4 years I've been subscribed to this list I'm horrified by the rudeness of this user. --Peter c0ldbyte wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Peter Kieser wrote: Why must you continue to respond to threads that you have no answer for, wasting our bandwidth, disk space, and time to read your useless messages? --Peter Apparently you have no concern in public lists and it aggravates your mental cpacity for information. As I do know some things I dont know everything but am willing to give incite into problems hoping to lead another to the answer. Now if this is nothing you would like to read then just shut your fucking mouthfingers and go curl up next to your mommy ya little fuck faced midget. - -- ( When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson 1998 ) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xF7DF979F Comment: Fingerprint = D1DC 0AA4 1C4E EAD4 24EB 7E77 B261 50BA F7DF 979F iD8DBQFCafWmsmFQuvffl58RAoJnAJ99c0MY5R1gRJuYExA77KGTbFSCpwCeImAS P/HPS18GATsQGXpUhudHFvI= =A8Rj -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ipfw1sysctl and lifetime
Why must you continue to respond to threads that you have no answer for, wasting our bandwidth, disk space, and time to read your useless messages? --Peter c0ldbyte wrote: On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Omar Lopez Limonta wrote: I Change: net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_ack_lifetime: 300 - 3600 net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_udp_lifetime: 10 - 10 net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets: 256 - 1024 net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max: 1000 - 2500 ¿Are good these values? , ¿i need chanege another value? Dont know my friend. I have no way of testing those out right now. I assume those values are from a 5.x machine I only run 4.x's at the moment untill I test 5.4-RELEASE more and evaluate its potential and gain on my systems. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ipfw1sysctl and lifetime
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Omar Lopez Limonta wrote: Hi: Anyone know what are the sysctl option to give more lifetime to net packets? Or another anything to elongate the net packets lifetime without use ipfw2? Thanks. sysctl -a |grep ttl will grep for any matching (Time To Live) settings. if thats what your looking for. -- ( When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson 1998 ) ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ipfw1sysctl and lifetime
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Omar Lopez Limonta wrote: I Change: net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_ack_lifetime: 300 - 3600 net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_udp_lifetime: 10 - 10 net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets: 256 - 1024 net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max: 1000 - 2500 ¿Are good these values? , ¿i need chanege another value? Dont know my friend. I have no way of testing those out right now. I assume those values are from a 5.x machine I only run 4.x's at the moment untill I test 5.4-RELEASE more and evaluate its potential and gain on my systems. -- ( When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson 1998 )___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
