Re: tape buffer size - scsi

2000-08-25 Thread Christoph Kukulies

On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 10:52:49AM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
 
 Sorry, I posted this already in 'questions' but since it is very urgent to
 my tape read back withing the next couple of hours I'm posting my plea
 here also:

Ooops. I must have been very nervous about getting my tape read back
that I made so many typos.

I finally solved it. The tape was written a bit weird at then.

dd if=/dev/rsa0 ibs=256k | tar zxvf -

solved the problem.

 
-- 
Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: tape buffer size - scsi

2000-08-25 Thread Wilko Bulte

On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 10:52:49AM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:

 Sorry, I posted this already in 'questions' but since it is very urgent to
 my tape read back withing the next couple of hours I'm posting my plea
 here also:
 
 
 I'm trying to read a DAT tape with important backup data.
 The device is a DEC TLZ04.
 sa0 at ncr0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0
 sa0: DEC TLZ04 1989(C)DEC 1915 Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device
 sa0: 3.300MB/s transfers
 
 When trying to read it (tar tvf /dev/rsa0) I'm getting a kernel message:
 
 (sa0:ncr0:0:4:0): 132497-byte tape record bigger than suplied buffer
 
 Any ideas? 

The tape has probably been written by a non-FreeBSD machine. Like an SGI or
something like that. They can do much larger blocksizes. I think FreeBSD is
limited to 64k (??).

W/
-- 
Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arnhem, the Netherlands


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message