Re: Sil vs. SiI
On Oct 18 at 11:39, Soeren Schmidt spoke: > It seems Hanspeter Roth wrote: > > I have an Enmic installed which reports > > atapci1: port [...] > > > > Is this reported literally by the controller or is it derived from a > > table lookup? > > >From a table, seems I could use better glasses :) Now I have just rebooted and there are several clearscreens. But I thought I've seen `Sil' in the controller's Bios message. But I've seen this only with my glasses. So it may not be reliable... -Hanspeter To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Sil vs. SiI
It seems Hanspeter Roth wrote: > On Oct 11 at 09:01, Soeren Schmidt spoke: > > > The Sil 680 does support ATAPI DMA, I'll need to dig out the older > > I have an Enmic installed which reports > atapci1: port [...] > > Is this reported literally by the controller or is it derived from a > table lookup? >From a table, seems I could use better glasses :) -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Sil vs. SiI
On Oct 11 at 09:01, Soeren Schmidt spoke: > The Sil 680 does support ATAPI DMA, I'll need to dig out the older I have an Enmic installed which reports atapci1: port [...] Is this reported literally by the controller or is it derived from a table lookup? It seems to me that on http://www.siliconimage.com/products/sii0680.asp they are talking about SiI with a capital I as opposed to a little l. -Hanspeter To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
