Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Don Lewis wrote: On 27 May, Julian Elischer wrote: For the last month (more actually)(and after completely rebuilding my system and all the ports on it) I have not been able to compile the openoffice port due to gcc failures. (I have posted the message earlier several times) Has anyone been able to compile the openoffice port recently? somewhere in it's private compilation of mozilla (why does it do that? I already have mozilla running?) gcc (doing c++) has a heart attach and keels over dead. I think the reason to make the build take longer. Lots of fun on 400 MHz PII. the mozilla addresbook - OOo integration part of OOo needs a patch that continues suffer the sad fate of many uncomitted mozilla patches. if you change the main mozilla port to use it, you could just use the main one and no longer need the separate build. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure
Julian Elischer wrote [2003-05-27]: For the last month (more actually)(and after completely rebuilding my system and all the ports on it) I have not been able to compile the openoffice port due to gcc failures. (I have posted the message earlier several times) Has anyone been able to compile the openoffice port recently? [..] I assume you tried to compile the elephant because you weren't aware that there exist a fbsd package for it. I did the same thing until I got tired ;-) http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ has packages for -stable and -current. On my -stable I run openoffice-1.0.3_2. On my -current, after trying to run openoffice-1.1Beta1 and being bitten by all sort of bugs, I just installed the compat libraries for -stable and then the same openoffice-1.0.3_2 for -stable. Runs like a charm :-) marco ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 04:55:47PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: Has anyone been able to compile the openoffice port recently? It built successfully for me on 25th April in -STABLE. Are you using any non-default flags or options? Last time I tried to build it with debugging enabled (beginning of February), it failed (reproducably) inside Mozilla but no-one seemed interested. (The OO maintainer claimed it was a Mozilla problem but that side-stepped the fact that the OO port explicitly over-rides the no debugging flags in Mozilla). I know that I previously compiled OO with debugging but it seems that one of the OO or Mozilla upgrades broke it. Peter ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc problem/openoffice failure
For the last month (more actually)(and after completely rebuilding my system and all the ports on it) I have not been able to compile the openoffice port due to gcc failures. (I have posted the message earlier several times) Has anyone been able to compile the openoffice port recently? somewhere in it's private compilation of mozilla (why does it do that? I already have mozilla running?) gcc (doing c++) has a heart attach and keels over dead. This has been reproducible for me for at least a month and probably more. Has anyone else seen this? Is the openoffice port working for everyone else? (on FreeBSD 4.8++) (4.8-RELEASE had the same problem for me) julian ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure
Julian Elischer wrote: ... I have not been able to compile the openoffice port ... ... Has anyone else seen this? I tried to build openoffice on a clean -current system, built from a recent cvsup, and it failed to compile... This was perhaps a week and a half ago, kept meaning to get back and look at it, but time seems to have got the best of me. - bruce ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure
On Tue, 27 May 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruce R. Montague [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : Julian Elischer wrote: : : ... I have not been able to compile the openoffice port ... : : ... Has anyone else seen this? : : : I tried to build openoffice on a clean -current system, : built from a recent cvsup, and it failed to compile... This : was perhaps a week and a half ago, kept meaning to get back : and look at it, but time seems to have got the best of me. I wouldn't attempt something this complex without portupgrade... Warner this WAS under port-upgrade.. run 3 times sequentially of course now that I've said this, it may have decided to go past the spot where it failed last time. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure
On 27 May, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruce R. Montague [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : Julian Elischer wrote: : : ... I have not been able to compile the openoffice port ... : : ... Has anyone else seen this? : : : I tried to build openoffice on a clean -current system, : built from a recent cvsup, and it failed to compile... This : was perhaps a week and a half ago, kept meaning to get back : and look at it, but time seems to have got the best of me. I wouldn't attempt something this complex without portupgrade... That reminds me ... the openoffice port ignores non-zero exit status in too many places. More than once I've had the install phase (and maybe even the build phase fail which then proceeded to the install phase which then failed), but the the exit status was ignored, make exited with a zero status, and portupgrade thought that the installation succeeded and then nuked the working backup copy of openoffice and did a make clean. A build from scratch takes more than 24 hours on my -stable box ... ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
