Re: nVidia chipsets?

2006-12-12 Thread Bruce Burden
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:41:36AM -0600, Vulpes Velox wrote:

  The only problem I ever ran into was with was the
 ethernet chipset. It was originally a bit funky in regards to
 deciding to go unresonsive for awhile.
 
Hmmm, I am having that problem with my Tyan Thunder
   K8WE with the nForce4 Profession chipset using the nfe driver
   from 9/1. I have NOT used the new PHY driver from late October/
   early November. Perhaps that is the issue?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ Dec  6 18:13:44 tigerfish2 routed[444]: interface nfe0 to 
192.168.1.2 broken: in=0 ierr=3 out=3 oerr=0
Dec  6 18:13:49 tigerfish2 routed[444]: interface nfe0 to 192.168.1.2 restored

Hmm, now I see there is a 12/11 driver...

Anyway, I have an Intel GB NIC arriving soon, so I'll
   get this dealt with one way or another. :-)

Bruce
-- 

  I like bad! Bruce BurdenAustin, TX.
- Thuganlitha
The Power and the Prophet
Robert Don Hughes

___
freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: nVidia chipsets?

2006-12-12 Thread Ivan Voras
Bruce Burden wrote:

   Anyway, I have an Intel GB NIC arriving soon, so I'll
get this dealt with one way or another. :-)

Thanks, all - I'll keep my PCI NIC around :)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: nVidia chipsets?

2006-12-12 Thread Vulpes Velox
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:13:38 -0600
Vulpes Velox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:09:57 -0600
 Bruce Burden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:41:36AM -0600, Vulpes Velox wrote:
  
The only problem I ever ran into was with was
   the ethernet chipset. It was originally a bit funky in regards
   to deciding to go unresonsive for awhile.
   
  Hmmm, I am having that problem with my Tyan Thunder
 K8WE with the nForce4 Profession chipset using the nfe driver
 from 9/1. I have NOT used the new PHY driver from late October/
 early November. Perhaps that is the issue?
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ Dec  6 18:13:44 tigerfish2 routed[444]:
  interface nfe0 to 192.168.1.2 broken: in=0 ierr=3 out=3 oerr=0 Dec
  6 18:13:49 tigerfish2 routed[444]: interface nfe0 to 192.168.1.2
  restored
  
  Hmm, now I see there is a 12/11 driver...
  
  Anyway, I have an Intel GB NIC arriving soon, so I'll
 get this dealt with one way or another. :-)
 
 Nfe? What device is that there? Only seen the nve driver.

Never mind. Just noticed it. =^.^=
___
freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


nVidia chipsets?

2006-12-11 Thread Ivan Voras
Do recent socket AM2 nVidia based chipsets work ok with FreeBSD 6.x?
Specifically:

MBO DFI, s. AM2, Infinity nF-M2I, nFORCE 4, BUS 2000 MHz, serial ATA,
RAID, 5.1 sound, DDR 2, 1Gbps, FireWire, ATX 2

Do ATA  SATA ports, ethernet and sound work? What about an ATI graphics
card?




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: nVidia chipsets?

2006-12-11 Thread Dieter
 MBO DFI, s. AM2, Infinity nF-M2I, nFORCE 4,

Is this the same nFORCE 4 used on the socket 939 boards?

I have a 939 with nforce 4 ultra.  (ultra means it supports
SATA's NCQ queueing)  I'm running FreeBSD 6.0 on it.

 Do ATA  SATA ports, ethernet and sound work? 

The nforce Ethernet works, but I've only used it for a few minutes,
and didn't stress it at all.  I haven't tried sound with FreeBSD.

PATA and SATA work.  It can read from 4 SATA disks at once as fast as the
data comes off the platters (65-70MB/s at the fast end of the platters).
I'm running soft updates and have the disks' write cache in write-through
mode to avoid scrambled filesystems.  In write-through mode I get about
6-7 MB/s.

If anyone knows how to turn on SATA NCQ, please let me know.

But there is a problem.  Writing to one drive slows down writes to
an unrelated drive.  (I'm not using any form of RAID.)  See the
processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O thread
in -questions for more info on this problem.  At this point I don't
know if this problem has anything to do with the nforce chip or not.

 What about an ATI graphics card?

My board has an onboard ATI chip.  Xorg seems happy with it,
but ATI doesn't support sync-on-green, so it is useless with
my monitor.

The nforce USB works, although I haven't stressed it.
___
freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: nVidia chipsets?

2006-12-11 Thread Vulpes Velox
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:41:04 +0100
Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Do recent socket AM2 nVidia based chipsets work ok with FreeBSD 6.x?
 Specifically:
 
 MBO DFI, s. AM2, Infinity nF-M2I, nFORCE 4, BUS 2000 MHz, serial
 ATA, RAID, 5.1 sound, DDR 2, 1Gbps, FireWire, ATX 2

The board will be fine. Never ran into any problems with nVidia
boards recently. The only problem I ever ran into was with was the
ethernet chipset. It was originally a bit funky in regards to
deciding to go unresonsive for awhile. Not had any problems in the

 Do ATA  SATA ports, ethernet and sound work? What about an ATI
 graphics card?


The SATA and ATA work nicely on them. Same for the sound and
ethernet. If you want good graphics performance you will want to go
with a nVidia card.

I have been really pleased with the nVidia chipsets under FreeBSD.
___
freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]