RE: strange dummynet WFQ problem
It effectively works well, but I still have a problem: When I use my bandwidth (download a huge file) and I start a ping at the same time, latency grows from 15ms up to 300ms. Again my conf: 5 allow ip from any to any via lo0 6 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 7 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00011 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ext 21046 queue 8 ip from any to 172.20.1.23 in via ext 21047 queue 9 ip from 172.20.1.23 to any in via int 65535 allow ip from any to any Cheers Alex -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Luigi Rizzo Envoye : mercredi 29 juin 2005 18:33 A : Alexandre D. Cc : freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Objet : Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem hi, when a pipe or queue has a mask of all 0's it only shows the addresses of the first packet that matched, so you don't have to worry about that. Also, if queues are linked to the pipe, the accounting is done on the queues and not on the pipe. cheers luigi On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:27:48PM +0200, Alexandre D. wrote: Hi guys I have a strange problem. here is a simple sample my conf (hic!): # ipfw list 5 allow ip from any to any via lo0 6 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 7 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00011 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ext 21046 queue 8 ip from any to 172.20.1.23 21047 queue 9 ip from 172.20.1.23 to any 65535 allow ip from any to any bash-2.05b# ipfw pipe list 1: 1.024 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x 2: 1.024 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x ... q8: weight 4 pipe 1 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 udp dns address/53 172.20.1.195/3007 1032 254524 0 0 0 q9: weight 4 pipe 2 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 udp 172.20.1.195/68255.255.255.255/67 58953330 00 0 The thing is that: -it looks that datas are going through the corrects queues, -each queue is correctly linked to a pipe -there is not accounting on both pipes -only dns packets are shown by this command. My wonders are: -How can I be sure that my queues are correctly linked to the pipes? -Why don't I have accounting on the pipes? -Why don't I get other than dns packet accounting? Sorry for the english Thanks for the answer Cheers Alex ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:04:47PM +0100, Alexandre DELAY wrote: It effectively works well, but I still have a problem: When I use my bandwidth (download a huge file) and I start a ping at the same time, latency grows from 15ms up to 300ms. it is normal because the ping packets are queued behind the other traffic. luigi Again my conf: 5 allow ip from any to any via lo0 6 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 7 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00011 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ext 21046 queue 8 ip from any to 172.20.1.23 in via ext 21047 queue 9 ip from 172.20.1.23 to any in via int 65535 allow ip from any to any Cheers Alex -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Luigi Rizzo Envoye : mercredi 29 juin 2005 18:33 A : Alexandre D. Cc : freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Objet : Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem hi, when a pipe or queue has a mask of all 0's it only shows the addresses of the first packet that matched, so you don't have to worry about that. Also, if queues are linked to the pipe, the accounting is done on the queues and not on the pipe. cheers luigi On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:27:48PM +0200, Alexandre D. wrote: Hi guys I have a strange problem. here is a simple sample my conf (hic!): # ipfw list 5 allow ip from any to any via lo0 6 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 7 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00011 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ext 21046 queue 8 ip from any to 172.20.1.23 21047 queue 9 ip from 172.20.1.23 to any 65535 allow ip from any to any bash-2.05b# ipfw pipe list 1: 1.024 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x 2: 1.024 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x ... q8: weight 4 pipe 1 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 udp dns address/53 172.20.1.195/3007 1032 254524 0 0 0 q9: weight 4 pipe 2 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 udp 172.20.1.195/68255.255.255.255/67 58953330 00 0 The thing is that: -it looks that datas are going through the corrects queues, -each queue is correctly linked to a pipe -there is not accounting on both pipes -only dns packets are shown by this command. My wonders are: -How can I be sure that my queues are correctly linked to the pipes? -Why don't I have accounting on the pipes? -Why don't I get other than dns packet accounting? Sorry for the english Thanks for the answer Cheers Alex ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: strange dummynet WFQ problem
Interresting. I didn't find anythong about that. Where can I learn more about this priorities? Alex -Message d'origine- De : Luigi Rizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoye : dimanche 20 novembre 2005 19:10 A : Alexandre DELAY Cc : freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Objet : Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:04:47PM +0100, Alexandre DELAY wrote: It effectively works well, but I still have a problem: When I use my bandwidth (download a huge file) and I start a ping at the same time, latency grows from 15ms up to 300ms. it is normal because the ping packets are queued behind the other traffic. luigi Again my conf: 5 allow ip from any to any via lo0 6 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 7 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00011 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ext 21046 queue 8 ip from any to 172.20.1.23 in via ext 21047 queue 9 ip from 172.20.1.23 to any in via int 65535 allow ip from any to any Cheers Alex -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Luigi Rizzo Envoye : mercredi 29 juin 2005 18:33 A : Alexandre D. Cc : freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Objet : Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem hi, when a pipe or queue has a mask of all 0's it only shows the addresses of the first packet that matched, so you don't have to worry about that. Also, if queues are linked to the pipe, the accounting is done on the queues and not on the pipe. cheers luigi On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:27:48PM +0200, Alexandre D. wrote: Hi guys I have a strange problem. here is a simple sample my conf (hic!): # ipfw list 5 allow ip from any to any via lo0 6 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 7 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00011 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ext 21046 queue 8 ip from any to 172.20.1.23 21047 queue 9 ip from 172.20.1.23 to any 65535 allow ip from any to any bash-2.05b# ipfw pipe list 1: 1.024 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x 2: 1.024 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x ... q8: weight 4 pipe 1 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 udp dns address/53 172.20.1.195/3007 1032 254524 0 0 0 q9: weight 4 pipe 2 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 udp 172.20.1.195/68255.255.255.255/67 58953330 0 0 0 The thing is that: -it looks that datas are going through the corrects queues, -each queue is correctly linked to a pipe -there is not accounting on both pipes -only dns packets are shown by this command. My wonders are: -How can I be sure that my queues are correctly linked to the pipes? -Why don't I have accounting on the pipes? -Why don't I get other than dns packet accounting? Sorry for the english Thanks for the answer Cheers Alex ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:40:01PM -0200, AT Matik wrote: On Sunday 20 November 2005 19:25, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:16:40PM +0100, Alexandre DELAY wrote: Interresting. I didn't find anythong about that. Where can I learn more about this priorities? well, dummynet does not du priorities but weights. lookup google for WFQ or read the ipfw manpage. ehh, I guess he wanted to know why icmp echo is beeing queued because you said it before because that's what is written in his ruleset. (at list i suppose - he did not sent ipfw queue show output but from his previous example he did not put masks on the queues). ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
