Re: kern/155927: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules

2011-03-30 Thread Ian Smith
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
 > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:51:06 +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
 > 
 > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
 > >  > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 06:14:20AM +, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
 > >  > > Old Synopsis: Ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the
 > >  > > rules, letting everything Rules New Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw stops to
 > >  > > check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-standards->freebsd-ipfw
 > >  > > Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
 > >  > > Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 28 06:13:10 UTC 2011
 > >  > > Responsible-Changed-Why:
 > >  > > reclassify, although I do not think there is enough information
 > >  > > here to proceed.
 > >  > 
 > >  > interesting use of the term 'bag' for 'packet'!
 > > 
 > > Even with that cleared up, I can't make out what it may have to do with
 > > syslogging .. perhaps one of our Russian speakers could intermediate?
 > > 
 > 
 > I think it means that if newsyslog rotates /var/log/security then ipfw 
 > warnings are not logged anymore ;)

I've tried imagining how that could happen, without success - unless 
/var/log/security somehow wasn't truncated by newsyslog on rotation?

% grep security /etc/*syslog.conf
/etc/syslog.conf:security.* /var/log/security
/etc/newsyslog.conf:/var/log/security   640  21500  *  J

 > I haven't seen such behaviour myself and that file is handled by syslog 
 > just like many others.

+1.  Smells a bit like permissions .. from thousands of miles away :)

cheers, Ian
___
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: kern/155927: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules

2011-03-29 Thread Julian Elischer

On 3/27/11 11:44 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 06:14:20AM +, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:

Old Synopsis: Ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting 
everything Rules
New Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, 
letting everything Rules

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-standards->freebsd-ipfw
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 28 06:13:10 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
reclassify, although I do not think there is enough information here
to proceed.

interesting use of the term 'bag' for 'packet'!


google translate for someone who doesn't speak english..


___
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



___
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: kern/155927: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules

2011-03-28 Thread Marcin Wisnicki
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:51:06 +1100, Ian Smith wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>  > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 06:14:20AM +, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
>  > > Old Synopsis: Ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the
>  > > rules, letting everything Rules New Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw stops to
>  > > check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules
>  > > 
>  > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-standards->freebsd-ipfw
>  > > Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
>  > > Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 28 06:13:10 UTC 2011
>  > > Responsible-Changed-Why:
>  > > reclassify, although I do not think there is enough information
>  > > here to proceed.
>  > 
>  > interesting use of the term 'bag' for 'packet'!
> 
> Even with that cleared up, I can't make out what it may have to do with
> syslogging .. perhaps one of our Russian speakers could intermediate?
> 

I think it means that if newsyslog rotates /var/log/security then ipfw 
warnings are not logged anymore ;)

I haven't seen such behaviour myself and that file is handled by syslog 
just like many others.

___
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: kern/155927: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules

2011-03-27 Thread Ian Smith
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
 > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 06:14:20AM +, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
 > > Old Synopsis: Ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, 
 > > letting everything Rules
 > > New Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the 
 > > rules, letting everything Rules
 > > 
 > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-standards->freebsd-ipfw
 > > Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
 > > Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 28 06:13:10 UTC 2011
 > > Responsible-Changed-Why: 
 > > reclassify, although I do not think there is enough information here
 > > to proceed.
 > 
 > interesting use of the term 'bag' for 'packet'!

Even with that cleared up, I can't make out what it may have to do with 
syslogging .. perhaps one of our Russian speakers could intermediate?

cheers, Ian
___
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: kern/155927: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules

2011-03-27 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 06:14:20AM +, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Old Synopsis: Ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting 
> everything Rules
> New Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, 
> letting everything Rules
> 
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-standards->freebsd-ipfw
> Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
> Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 28 06:13:10 UTC 2011
> Responsible-Changed-Why: 
> reclassify, although I do not think there is enough information here
> to proceed.

interesting use of the term 'bag' for 'packet'!
___
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: kern/155927: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules

2011-03-27 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: Ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting 
everything Rules
New Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, 
letting everything Rules

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-standards->freebsd-ipfw
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 28 06:13:10 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
reclassify, although I do not think there is enough information here
to proceed.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=155927
___
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"