Re: recommended USB-c Ethernet adapter for laptop
>>>>> Hans Petter Selasky writes: > On 5/5/22 15:08, Ludovit Koren wrote: >> Hello, >> I am using FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #0 main-n253876-1e9ce60a6d7 on my >> laptop >> and to find a reliable USB-c Ethernet adapter. I have tried the following: >> ure0 on uhub0 >> ure0: on usbus1 >> miibus0: on ure0 >> rgephy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 >> rgephy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, auto >> ue0: on ure0 >> ue0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:4c:68:04:20 >> and >> ugen1.4: at usbus1 >> axge0 on uhub3 >> axge0: on usbus1 >> miibus0: on axge0 >> ukphy0: PHY 3 on miibus0 >> ukphy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, auto, auto-flow >> ue0: on axge0 >> ue0: Ethernet address: 50:a0:30:02:b7:f6 >> both of them stop working when there is significant traffic on the >> interface, i.e. scp ISO image to the different computer. >> Please, could you advice good, reliable USB-c Ethernet interface. >> Thank you very much. >> Regards, >> lk >> > Hi, > I think the older axge's are OK. >> axge0 on uhub0 >> axge0: on usbus0 >> miibus0: on axge0 >> rgephy0: PHY 3 on miibus0 >> rgephy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 10baseT-FDX-flow, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, 1000baseT-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX-flow-master, auto, auto-flow >> ue0: on axge0 >> ue0: Ethernet address: 3c:2e:be:a0:b5:db > BTW: We should debug the issue with the axge's . no it is not after few seconds it stops working lk
recommended USB-c Ethernet adapter for laptop
Hello, I am using FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #0 main-n253876-1e9ce60a6d7 on my laptop and to find a reliable USB-c Ethernet adapter. I have tried the following: ure0 on uhub0 ure0: on usbus1 miibus0: on ure0 rgephy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 rgephy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, auto ue0: on ure0 ue0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:4c:68:04:20 and ugen1.4: at usbus1 axge0 on uhub3 axge0: on usbus1 miibus0: on axge0 ukphy0: PHY 3 on miibus0 ukphy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, auto, auto-flow ue0: on axge0 ue0: Ethernet address: 50:a0:30:02:b7:f6 both of them stop working when there is significant traffic on the interface, i.e. scp ISO image to the different computer. Please, could you advice good, reliable USB-c Ethernet interface. Thank you very much. Regards, lk
Re: LAN ure interface problem
>>>>> Hans Petter Selasky writes: > On 10/22/21 16:00, Ludovit Koren wrote: >> Hi, >> I have installed FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #1 >> main-n250134-225639e7db6-dirty >> on my notebook HP EliteBook 830 G7 and I am using RealTek usb LAN >> interface: >> ure0 on uhub0 >> ure0: on usbus1 >> miibus0: on ure0 >> rgephy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 >> rgephy0: OUI 0x00e04c, model 0x, rev. 0 >> rgephy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, auto >> ue0: on ure0 >> ue0: bpf attached >> ue0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:4c:68:04:20 >> When there is bigger load on the interface, for example rsync of the >> big >> directory, the carrier is lost. The only solution I found is to remove >> and insert the usb interface; ifconfig ue0 down, ifconfig ue0 up did not >> help. The output of the ifconfig: >> ue0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu >> 1500 >> options=68009b >> ether 00:e0:4c:68:04:20 >> inet 192.168.1.18 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >> status: active >> nd6 options=29 >> I do not know and did not find anything relevant, if the driver is >> buggy >> or the hardware has some problems. Please, advice. >> Regards, >> > Not the same device, but similar issue: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258057 I don't know if I understand it right.The issue is with dropping power... Mine is holding power right: usbconfig ugen1.1: <0x8086 XHCI root HUB> at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=SUPER (5.0Gbps) pwr=SAVE (0mA) ugen0.1: <0x8086 XHCI root HUB> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=SUPER (5.0Gbps) pwr=SAVE (0mA) ugen0.2: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON (500mA) ugen0.3: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON (100mA) ugen0.4: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON (100mA) ugen0.5: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON (100mA) ugen1.2: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=SUPER (5.0Gbps) pwr=ON (72mA) I am attaching the usbdump -d 1.2 when it stops working. lk
LAN ure interface problem
Hi, I have installed FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #1 main-n250134-225639e7db6-dirty on my notebook HP EliteBook 830 G7 and I am using RealTek usb LAN interface: ure0 on uhub0 ure0: on usbus1 miibus0: on ure0 rgephy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 rgephy0: OUI 0x00e04c, model 0x, rev. 0 rgephy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, auto ue0: on ure0 ue0: bpf attached ue0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:4c:68:04:20 When there is bigger load on the interface, for example rsync of the big directory, the carrier is lost. The only solution I found is to remove and insert the usb interface; ifconfig ue0 down, ifconfig ue0 up did not help. The output of the ifconfig: ue0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=68009b ether 00:e0:4c:68:04:20 inet 192.168.1.18 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active nd6 options=29 I do not know and did not find anything relevant, if the driver is buggy or the hardware has some problems. Please, advice. Regards, lk
bce bridge problem
Hi, I am trying to configure bhyve with FreeBSD Guest and Centos Guest. I am using FreeBSD 10.2 RELEASE or 11.0 CURRENT (November 19) as a host. The host is setup with bce as bridging interface. The network in the host is not working. (I did a similar setup with FreeBSD 10-STABLE and Centos using bge and the host network is running). I found a problem regarding bce and bridging: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2010-August/026203.html but it is few years old. Have anybody problem with bce driver and bridging? Any solution or workarounds? Thank you very much in advance for your advice. Regards, lk ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Cluster solution
Hi, I need help in designing of cluster solution based on FreeBSD. I tried carp for switching IP addresses, it seems to work ok. The solution is suitable for DNS, MTA, static web pages, web proxy and reverse proxy. I didn't find anything quite suitable for dynamic web pages with PHP and MySQL backend. I found just master and slave replication and clustering in MySQL. There could be problem if master fails with automatic promotion of slave to master and with the resynchronization of database after recovery of master database. Has anybody any experience with described setup. Howtos, pointers, links about configuration and software solutions are very appreciated. Thanks in advance. Regards, lk ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Routes for interface
Hi, is there any possibility to set the routing statically on a multi-homed host so, that the packet is sent back via the same interface, as it has came from? Something like more default routes (it is not good name for it, I hope you can understand what I mean), depending on particular interface. Thanks. Regards, lk ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: static routes
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:12:51 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED](=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?=) said: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enig31C5AF3351A4904FFAEF208E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovit Koren wrote: Hi, =20 I realized on several different versions of FreeBSD including 5.4-STABLE, when using static routes to specific subnets and the WAN link goes down for unpredictable reasons, the server gets ICMP redirect message and rearranges routes to use default router. Then all the traffic is routed to the default router even the WAN link is again up. Other unix like system (HP-UX, Linux) do not act the way, i.e. they do not change static routes. =20 Are the routes still there after link goes down and then up? yes netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default195.28.109.1 UGS 0 760 bge0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 011589lo0 192.168.100195.28.109.24 UGS 08 bge0 192.168.100.1 195.28.109.1 UGHD3 02 bge0 3598 195.28.109 link#1 UC 00 bge0 195.28.109.1 00:0b:ac:29:1e:ca UHLW30 bge0324 195.28.109.24 00:0f:34:04:a2:f0 UHLW20 bge0 1162 for each usage the expire counter starts again from 3600. I must admit, after analyzing the problem again, that the problem arises only if the net (routing devices) are not configured consistently, i.e. not all of them can or send ICMP redirect. The problem was on the net with Cisco router and PIX. It seems, according to the Cisco declaration, that PIX cannot send ICMP messages through the same interface and cannot route back via the same interface. Now, I have no 2 routers or 2 PIX-es at the disposal that's why I cannot test all possible combinations. Thanks. Regards, lk ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
static routes
Hi, I realized on several different versions of FreeBSD including 5.4-STABLE, when using static routes to specific subnets and the WAN link goes down for unpredictable reasons, the server gets ICMP redirect message and rearranges routes to use default router. Then all the traffic is routed to the default router even the WAN link is again up. Other unix like system (HP-UX, Linux) do not act the way, i.e. they do not change static routes. Should not be ignored the ICMP redirect messages concerning static routes? Thank you very much in advance. Regards, lk ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: static routes
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 04:16:07 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED](Giorgos Keramidas) said: On 2006-03-20 12:51, Ludovit Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I realized on several different versions of FreeBSD including 5.4-STABLE, when using static routes to specific subnets and the WAN link goes down for unpredictable reasons, the server gets ICMP redirect message and rearranges routes to use default router. Then all the traffic is routed to the default router even the WAN link is again up. Other unix like system (HP-UX, Linux) do not act the way, i.e. they do not change static routes. Should not be ignored the ICMP redirect messages concerning static routes? That depends on what you have configured the system to do. You can set the net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect sysctl to 1 to drop them. Maybe my question was misleading. The static route should be static, i.e. it should never change that's why the name is static, I feel. Generally, I think, the ICMP redirect should be enabled in the stack. I didn't read RFC about ICMP and about routing and I do not really know if the FreeBSD implementation is correct one. I think your proposal is a hack. Another question seems to be: Should be the default router configured so that it knows about all static routes and routers in the subnet and therefore it can send ICMP redirects to 'static route' routers as well? Regards, lk ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
